IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jcmkts/v58y2020i4p856-871.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bending and Breaking the Single Resolution Mechanism: The Case of Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Shawn Donnelly
  • Ioannis G. Asimakopoulos

Abstract

This article examines the political economy and law of bank resolution in the case of Italy – specifically, its treatment of three failing banks – the Monte dei Paschi, Veneto and Vicenza banks – which were resolved in 2016–17. These three cases stand out for the relatively large degree of discretion exercised by the national resolution and state aid authorities, ultimately with the permission of their European counterparts. This article examines the motivations of Italian authorities in lobbying the Commission for leeway in applying the bank recovery and resolution directive and analyses the intricacies of the legal framework to underline the extent of discretion exercised by policy‐makers. It concludes that the discretion visible in these three cases is not (entirely) contained within EU law, and that bending the law or turning a blind eye to infractions was key to understanding the EU approach to Italy.

Suggested Citation

  • Shawn Donnelly & Ioannis G. Asimakopoulos, 2020. "Bending and Breaking the Single Resolution Mechanism: The Case of Italy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 856-871, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:58:y:2020:i:4:p:856-871
    DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12992
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jcms.12992?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Silvia Merler & Guntram B. Wolff, 2013. "Ending uncertainty- recapitalisation under European Central Bank supervision," Policy Contributions 806, Bruegel.
    2. Amable, Bruno, 2003. "The Diversity of Modern Capitalism," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199261147.
    3. Shawn Donnelly, 2018. "Advocacy coalitions and the lack of deposit insurance in Banking Union," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 210-223, July.
    4. Crouch, Colin, 2005. "Capitalist Diversity and Change: Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199286652.
    5. Howarth, David & Quaglia, Lucia, 2016. "The Political Economy of European Banking Union," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198727927.
    6. Daniel Gros, 2013. "Banking union with a sovereign virus," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 48(2), pages 93-97, March.
    7. Michel Goyer & Rocio Valdivielso del Real, 2014. "Protection of domestic bank ownership in France and Germany: The functional equivalency of institutional diversity in takeovers," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 790-819, August.
    8. Lucia Quaglia & Sebasti�n Royo, 2015. "Banks and the political economy of the sovereign debt crisis in Italy and Spain," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 485-507, June.
    9. David Howarth & Lucia Quaglia, 2018. "The difficult construction of a European Deposit Insurance Scheme: a step too far in Banking Union?," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 190-209, July.
    10. Shawn Donnelly, 2018. "Advocacy coalitions and the lack of deposit insurance in Banking Union," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 210-223, July.
    11. Ioannis G. Asimakopoulos, 2018. "International law as a negotiation tool in Banking Union; the case of the Single Resolution Fund," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 118-131, April.
    12. Ioannis G. Asimakopoulos, 2018. "International law as a negotiation tool in Banking Union; the case of the Single Resolution Fund," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 118-131, April.
    13. David Howarth & Lucia Quaglia, 2018. "The difficult construction of a European Deposit Insurance Scheme: a step too far in Banking Union?," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 21(3), pages 190-209, July.
    14. Silvia Merler & Jean Pisani-Ferry, 2012. "Who's afraid of sovereign bonds?," Policy Contributions 695, Bruegel.
    15. Götz, Martin & Krahnen, Jan Pieter & Tröger, Tobias, 2017. "Taking bail-in seriously: The looming risks for banking policy in the rescue of Monte Paschi di Siena," SAFE Policy Letters 54, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ioannis Asimakopoulos & David Howarth, 2022. "Stillborn Banking Union: Explaining Ineffective European Union Bank Resolution Rules," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 264-282, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna-Lena Högenauer, 2021. "Scrutiny or Complacency? Banking Union in the Bundestag and the Assemblée Nationale," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 219-229.
    2. Ioannis Asimakopoulos & David Howarth, 2022. "Stillborn Banking Union: Explaining Ineffective European Union Bank Resolution Rules," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 264-282, March.
    3. Amable, Bruno & Azizi, Karim, 2011. "Varieties of capitalism and varieties of macroeconomic policy. Are some economies more procyclical than others?," MPIfG Discussion Paper 11/6, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    4. Tony Edwards & Paul Marginson & Anthony Ferner, 2013. "Multinational Companies in Cross-National Context: Integration, Differentiation, and the Interactions between MNCS and Nation States," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 66(3), pages 547-587, May.
    5. Mihaela Tofan, 2022. "A Regulatory Perspective on the Actual Challenges for the European Deposit Insurance Scheme," Laws, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-13, October.
    6. Farkas Beáta, 2018. "What can institutional analysis say about capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe? Results and limitations," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 54(4), pages 283-290, December.
    7. Mazumdar, Surajit, 2010. "Indian Capitalism: A Case that doesn’t Fit?," MPRA Paper 28162, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Ahlquist, John S. & Breunig, Christian, 2009. "Country clustering in comparative political economy," MPIfG Discussion Paper 09/5, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    9. Fernández-Aguado, Pilar Gómez & Martínez, Eduardo Trigo & Ruíz, Rafael Moreno & Ureña, Antonio Partal, 2022. "Evaluation of European Deposit Insurance Scheme funding based on risk analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 234-247.
    10. Eckert, Sandra, 2020. "EU agencies in banking and energy between institutional and policy centralisation," SAFE Working Paper Series 278, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    11. Gómez Fernández-Aguado, Pilar & Partal Ureña, Antonio & Trigo Martínez, Eduardo, 2024. "Risk contribution to deposit insurance: Evidence from commercial and cooperative banks in the Eurozone," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 341-355.
    12. Daniel F. Schulz & Thomas Henökl, 2020. "New Alliances in Post-Brexit Europe: Does the New Hanseatic League Revive Nordic Political Cooperation?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 409-419.
    13. Daniel F. Schulz & Thomas Henökl, 2020. "New Alliances in Post-Brexit Europe: Does the New Hanseatic League Revive Nordic Political Cooperation?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 78-88.
    14. Rachael Gibson & Harald Bathelt, 2014. "Proximity relations and global knowledge flows: specialization and diffusion processes across capitalist varieties," Chapters, in: André Torre & Frédéric Wallet (ed.), Regional Development and Proximity Relations, chapter 9, pages 291-314, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    15. Gemma Scalise, 2021. "The local governance of active inclusion: A field for social partner action," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 27(1), pages 59-75, March.
    16. Alexander Ebner, 2010. "Varieties of Capitalism and the Limits of Entrepreneurship Policy: Institutional Reform in Germany’s Coordinated Market Economy," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 319-341, September.
    17. Kornilia Vikelidou & Athanasios Tagkalakis, 2023. "European Banking Union: state of play and proposals for the way forward," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(8), pages 1-11, August.
    18. Phil Almond & Maria Gonzalez Menendez, 2006. "Varieties of capitalism: the importance of political and social choices," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 12(3), pages 407-425, August.
    19. Bat Batjargal & Michael Hitt & Anne Tsui & Jean-Luc Arregle & Justin Webb & Toyah Miller, 2013. "Institutional Polycentrism, Entrepreneurs' Social Networks, and New Venture Growth," Post-Print hal-02276709, HAL.
    20. Marc van Essen & J. (Hans) van Oosterhout & Pursey P. M. A. R. Heugens, 2013. "Competition and Cooperation in Corporate Governance: The Effects of Labor Institutions on Blockholder Effectiveness in 23 European Countries," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 530-551, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jcmkts:v:58:y:2020:i:4:p:856-871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0021-9886 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.