IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamist/v62y2011i10p2024-2037.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Complexity and the practice of web information architecture

Author

Listed:
  • Sally Burford

Abstract

This article describes the outcomes of research that examined the practice of web information architecture (IA) in large organizations. Using a grounded theory approach, seven large organizations were investigated and the data were analyzed for emerging themes and concepts. The research finds that the practice of web IA is characterized by unpredictability, multiple perspectives, and a need for responsiveness, agility, and negotiation. This article claims that web IA occurs in a complex environment and has emergent, self‐organizing properties. There is value in examining the practice as a complex adaptive system. Using this metaphor, a pre‐determined, structured methodology that delivers a documented, enduring, information design for the web is found inadequate – dominant and traditional thinking and practice in the organization of information are challenged.

Suggested Citation

  • Sally Burford, 2011. "Complexity and the practice of web information architecture," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(10), pages 2024-2037, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:62:y:2011:i:10:p:2024-2037
    DOI: 10.1002/asi.21582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21582
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/asi.21582?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gerring, John, 2004. "What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good for?," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 98(2), pages 341-354, May.
    2. Philip Anderson & Alan Meyer & Kathleen Eisenhardt & Kathleen Carley & Andrew Pettigrew, 1999. "Introduction to the Special Issue: Applications of Complexity Theory to Organization Science," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(3), pages 233-236, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruzza, Mirko & Tiozzo, Barbara & Mantovani, Claudio & D’Este, Fabiano & Ravarotto, Licia, 2017. "Designing the information architecture of a complex website: A strategy based on news content and faceted classification," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 166-176.
    2. Mauricio B. Almeida & Eduardo R. Felipe & Renata Barcelos, 2020. "Toward a document‐centered ontological theory for information architecture in corporations," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(11), pages 1308-1326, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jessica Weber, 2023. "Coordination Challenges in Wind Energy Development: Lessons from Cross-Case Positive Planning Approaches to Avoid Multi-Level Governance ‘Free-Riding’," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-25, October.
    2. Ellinas, Christos & Allan, Neil & Johansson, Anders, 2016. "Project systemic risk: Application examples of a network model," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 50-62.
    3. Daniel Béland & Michael Howlett & Philip Rocco & Alex Waddan, 2020. "Designing policy resilience: lessons from the Affordable Care Act," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 53(2), pages 269-289, June.
    4. Rosina K Foli & Frank L K Ohemeng, 2022. "“Provide our basic needs or we go out”: the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, inequality, and social policy in Ghana [Easing of lockdown a relief to Ghana’s poor—despite fears it is premature]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(2), pages 217-230.
    5. Eba'a Atyi, Richard & Assembe-Mvondo, Samuel & Lescuyer, Guillaume & Cerutti, Paolo, 2013. "Impacts of international timber procurement policies on Central Africa's forestry sector: The case of Cameroon," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 40-48.
    6. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Lipson, Matthew M. & Chard, Rose, 2019. "Temporality, vulnerability, and energy justice in household low carbon innovations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 495-504.
    7. Goletz, Mirko & Haustein, Sonja & Wolking, Christina & L’Hostis, Alain, 2020. "Intermodality in European metropolises: The current state of the art, and the results of an expert survey covering Berlin, Copenhagen, Hamburg and Paris," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 109-122.
    8. Tan, Justin, 2007. "Phase transitions and emergence of entrepreneurship: The transformation of Chinese SOEs over time," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 77-96, January.
    9. Ivan Rodrigo Rizzo Dias & George Bedinelli Rossi, 2017. "How far is World Champion from World Class? Institutional effects on a Brazilian non-profit sports organization," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 14(Special I), pages 24-44, January.
    10. Paula Kivimaa & Karoline S. Rogge, 2020. "Interplay of Policy Experimentation and Institutional Change in Transformative Policy Mixes: The Case of Mobility as a Service in Finland," SPRU Working Paper Series 2020-17, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    11. Ania A Drzewiecka & Amelia Allan, 2024. "Educating Brands? How Integrating Behavioural Insights, Influential Marketing and Consumer Decision-Making Can Elevate Consumer Literacy in Fashion Branding," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(9), pages 726-744, September.
    12. Michael Blauberger & Susanne K. Schmidt, 2023. "Negative Integration Is What States Make of It? Tackling Labour Exploitation in the German Meat Sector," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 917-934, July.
    13. Oliver Strijbis, 2013. "Prototypical Weighting," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 42(4), pages 458-482, November.
    14. Bill McKelvey & Benyamin B. Lichtenstein & Pierpaolo Andriani, 2012. "When organisations and ecosystems interact: toward a law of requisite fractality in firms," International Journal of Complexity in Leadership and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1/2), pages 104-136.
    15. Jeannette M. Blackmar, 2014. "Deliberative Democracy, Civic Engagement and Food Policy Councils," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(2), pages 43-57.
    16. Léa Roger & Simon Otjes & Harmen van der Veer, 2017. "The financial crisis and the European Parliament: An analysis of the Two-Pack legislation," European Union Politics, , vol. 18(4), pages 560-580, December.
    17. Noha Shawki, 2019. "The Global Adolescent Girl Agenda: An Analysis of the Emergence and the Political Outcomes of Two Global Health Networks," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 10(1), pages 35-50.
    18. Gianluca Ferraro & Pierre Failler & Gregoire Touron-Gardic, 2023. "Biodiversity policy and subnational implementation in the remote regions of France," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 12033-12050, October.
    19. Kyle S. Herman, 2024. "Intermediaries and complexity: assessing emissions-based governance in the European Union’s EU-ETS," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 539-564, December.
    20. Etchemendy, Sebastian & Collier, Ruth Berins, 2007. "Down But Not Out: The Recovery of a Downsized Labor Movement in Argentina (2002-2006)," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt2bd6z06c, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jamist:v:62:y:2011:i:10:p:2024-2037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.asis.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.