IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2019i1p188-d301819.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Blockchain-Enabled Trade Finance Innovation: A Potential Paradigm Shift on Using Letter of Credit

Author

Listed:
  • Shuchih Ernest Chang

    (Graduate Institute of Technology Management, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan)

  • Hueimin Louis Luo

    (Graduate Institute of Technology Management, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan)

  • YiChian Chen

    (Graduate Institute of Technology Management, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan)

Abstract

This paper explores a potential paradigm shift in trade finance utilizing blockchain technology. Traditionally, the centralized operating model has governed trade finance and the manner in which traders handle business processes. However, such heavy reliance on centralized authorities has made for poor performance, the lack of flexibility and transparency, and vulnerability to malicious alteration. The blockchain, as a distributed ledger technology (DLT), has attracted growing attention and has the potential to disrupt legacy finance procedures such as payment by letter of credit (L/C). International trade players may benefit from the technological reengineering of financial processes through the implementation of blockchain- and smart contract-based platforms. From the conceptual perspective of a paradigm shift, this study analyzes the feasibility of blockchain innovation in trade finance through modern blockchain-based L/C initiatives. Moreover, this study also explores blockchain applications in terms of logistics tracking and how it integrates with trade finance procedures. This study contributes to the understanding of a blockchain paradigm shift with a multi-case study. The results may illuminate the potential future application of blockchain finance and provide researchers with an illustrative example of other finance-related capabilities. Studies of trade-related topics such as customs clearances, insurance, and logistics applications need to be addressed in the future to create a comprehensively trustless environment and facilitate the automation of trade.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuchih Ernest Chang & Hueimin Louis Luo & YiChian Chen, 2019. "Blockchain-Enabled Trade Finance Innovation: A Potential Paradigm Shift on Using Letter of Credit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:188-:d:301819
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/188/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/1/188/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Besiki Stvilia & Les Gasser & Michael B. Twidale & Linda C. Smith, 2007. "A framework for information quality assessment," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(12), pages 1720-1733, October.
    2. Jessel, Benjamin & DiCaprio, Alisa, 2018. "Can blockchain make trade finance more inclusive?," Journal of Financial Transformation, Capco Institute, vol. 47, pages 35-50.
    3. Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu & Gheorghe N. Popescu, 2018. "Risks of cyber attacks on financial audit activity," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 16(149), pages 140-140, February.
    4. Simon Fernandez-Vazquez & Rafael Rosillo & David De La Fuente & Paolo Priore, 2019. "Blockchain in FinTech: A Mapping Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-24, November.
    5. Ye Guo & Chen Liang, 2016. "Blockchain application and outlook in the banking industry," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Martin J. Eppler, 2006. "Managing Information Quality," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-3-540-32225-2, April.
    7. Chang, Shuchih Ernest & Chen, Yi-Chian & Lu, Ming-Fang, 2019. "Supply chain re-engineering using blockchain technology: A case of smart contract based tracking process," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1-11.
    8. Anne H. Gausdal & Karen V. Czachorowski & Marina Z. Solesvik, 2018. "Applying Blockchain Technology: Evidence from Norwegian Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu & Gheorghe N. Popescu, 2019. "An Exploratory Study Based on a Questionnaire Concerning Green and Sustainable Finance, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Performance: Evidence from the Romanian Business Environment," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-79, October.
    10. Gerring, John, 2004. "What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good for?," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 98(2), pages 341-354, May.
    11. Joon-Seok Kim & Nina Shin, 2019. "The Impact of Blockchain Technology Application on Supply Chain Partnership and Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aiya Li & Xianhua Wei & Zhou He, 2020. "Robust Proof of Stake: A New Consensus Protocol for Sustainable Blockchain Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Yi Wang & Yafei Yang & Zhaoxiang Qin & Yefei Yang & Jun Li, 2023. "A Literature Review on the Application of Digital Technology in Achieving Green Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Heongu Lee & Changhak Yeon, 2021. "Blockchain-Based Traceability for Anti-Counterfeit in Cross-Border E-Commerce Transactions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Jinlong Lin & Xiaoxiao Chen & Guiquan Yan, 2023. "How Smart City Construction Affects Digital Inclusive Finance in China: From the Perspective of the Relationship between Government and Large Private Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Daeheon Choi & Chune Young Chung & Thou Seyha & Jason Young, 2020. "Factors Affecting Organizations’ Resistance to the Adoption of Blockchain Technology in Supply Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-37, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dutta, Pankaj & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Somani, Surabhi & Butala, Richa, 2020. "Blockchain technology in supply chain operations: Applications, challenges and research opportunities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    2. Vineet Paliwal & Shalini Chandra & Suneel Sharma, 2020. "Blockchain Technology for Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Literature Review and a Classification Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-39, September.
    3. Yi Wang & Yafei Yang & Zhaoxiang Qin & Yefei Yang & Jun Li, 2023. "A Literature Review on the Application of Digital Technology in Achieving Green Supply Chain Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Friedman, Nicola & Ormiston, Jarrod, 2022. "Blockchain as a sustainability-oriented innovation?: Opportunities for and resistance to Blockchain technology as a driver of sustainability in global food supply chains," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    5. Evin Özkan & Neda Azizi & Omid Haass, 2021. "Leveraging Smart Contract in Project Procurement through DLT to Gain Sustainable Competitive Advantages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-25, December.
    6. Nien-Ping Chen & Kao-Yi Shen & Chiung-Ju Liang, 2021. "Hybrid Decision Model for Evaluating Blockchain Business Strategy: A Bank’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, May.
    7. Kshetri, Nir, 2016. "Creation, deployment, diffusion and export of Sub-Saharan Africa-originated information technology-related innovations," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1274-1287.
    8. Garg, Poonam & Gupta, Bhumika & Chauhan, Ajay Kumar & Sivarajah, Uthayasankar & Gupta, Shivam & Modgil, Sachin, 2021. "Measuring the perceived benefits of implementing blockchain technology in the banking sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    9. Xiang Deng & Zhi Huang & Xiang Cheng, 2019. "FinTech and Sustainable Development: Evidence from China Based on P2P Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-19, November.
    10. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & Steve Simske & Horst Treiblmaier, 2021. "Blockchain Technologies in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: A Bibliometric Review," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-28, October.
    11. Kshetri, Nir, 2018. "1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 80-89.
    12. Chan, Hau-Ling & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Mendez De la Torre, Daniela, 2023. "The “SMARTER” framework and real application cases of blockchain," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    13. Vincenzo Varriale & Antonello Cammarano & Francesca Michelino & Mauro Caputo, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Chains with Blockchain, IoT and RFID: A Simulation on Order Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, June.
    14. Jessica Weber, 2023. "Coordination Challenges in Wind Energy Development: Lessons from Cross-Case Positive Planning Approaches to Avoid Multi-Level Governance ‘Free-Riding’," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-25, October.
    15. Zhu Yongjie, 2023. "Enterprise life cycle, financial technology and digital transformation of banks—Evidence from China," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(3), pages 486-500, September.
    16. Ilya Ivaninskiy & Irina Ivashkovskaya & Joseph A. McCahery, 2023. "Does digitalization mitigate or intensify the principal-agent conflict in a firm?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(3), pages 695-725, September.
    17. David Almorza-Gomar & Rafael Ravina-Ripoll & Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu & Araceli Galiano-Coronil, 2022. "Evaluation of an Experience of Academic Happiness through Football at University," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-13, May.
    18. Irene Sotiropoulou, 2021. "Persistent Food Shortages in Venetian Crete: A First Hypothesis," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-15, April.
    19. Cristina Chueca Vergara & Luis Ferruz Agudo, 2021. "Fintech and Sustainability: Do They Affect Each Other?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, June.
    20. Su, Dan & Zhang, Lijun & Peng, Hua & Saeidi, Parvaneh & Tirkolaee, Erfan Babaee, 2023. "Technical challenges of blockchain technology for sustainable manufacturing paradigm in Industry 4.0 era using a fuzzy decision support system," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2019:i:1:p:188-:d:301819. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.