IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ijurrs/v39y2015i2p284-304.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neoliberalization of Istanbul's Nightlife: Beer or Champagne?

Author

Listed:
  • Mine Eder
  • Özlem Öz

Abstract

type="main"> This article shows how the transformation of Istanbul's entertainment industry and of Beyoğlu, Istanbul's oldest, largest and the most diverse entertainment district, represents and reproduces spatial and economic divisions in the city. We argue that these differences also become compounded and intertwined with distinctions in consumption and taste. Taking a simultaneous look at the spatial, economic and symbolic transformations of the entertainment industry enables us to understand how and why these intense divisions emerge, and what kind of contestations, rationalizations and resistance strategies are at work in this transformation. A major contribution of this article is to document and discuss the political economy of the process of urban transformation in the city through the lens of the entertainment industry, providing an interesting case of ‘neoliberalism on the ground'. Examining the neoliberalization of nightlife in a relatively understudied context, Istanbul, also reveals that its segmentation and spatial inequality are not just determined by political economy but are also constitutive of it. By adding the concept of ‘image consumption' and taste distinctions into the analysis, the article also uncovers the symbolic nature of the ongoing transformations. Finally, exploring Beyoğlu as a district in transition with persistent contestations contributes, in turn, to the right to the city debate.

Suggested Citation

  • Mine Eder & Özlem Öz, 2015. "Neoliberalization of Istanbul's Nightlife: Beer or Champagne?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 284-304, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:39:y:2015:i:2:p:284-304
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1468-2427.12156
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Marcuse, 2009. "From critical urban theory to the right to the city," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2-3), pages 185-197, June.
    2. Colin J. Thomas & Rosemary D. F. Bromley, 2000. "City-centre Revitalisation: Problems of Fragmentation and Fear in the Evening and Night-time City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(8), pages 1403-1429, July.
    3. David Harvey, 2003. "The right to the city," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 939-941, December.
    4. John Lovering & Hade Türkmen, 2011. "Bulldozer Neo-liberalism in Istanbul: The State-led Construction of Property Markets, and the Displacement of the Urban Poor," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 73-96, February.
    5. Sharon Zukin, 1998. "Urban Lifestyles: Diversity and Standardisation in Spaces of Consumption," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(5-6), pages 825-839, May.
    6. Paul Chatterton & Robert Hollands, 2002. "Theorising Urban Playscapes: Producing, Regulating and Consuming Youthful Nightlife City Spaces," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(1), pages 95-116, January.
    7. Tuna Kuyucu & Özlem Ünsal, 2010. "‘Urban Transformation’ as State-led Property Transfer: An Analysis of Two Cases of Urban Renewal in Istanbul," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(7), pages 1479-1499, June.
    8. Zeynep Merey Enlil, 2011. "The Neoliberal Agenda and the Changing Urban Form of Istanbul," International Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 5-25, February.
    9. Caglar Keyder, 2005. "Globalization and Social Exclusion in Istanbul," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 124-134, March.
    10. Paul Chatterton, 2010. "The urban impossible: A eulogy for the unfinished city," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(3), pages 234-244, June.
    11. Robert Hollands & Paul Chatterton, 2003. "Producing nightlife in the new urban entertainment economy: corporatization, branding and market segmentation," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 361-385, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Renaud Vuignier, 2017. "Place branding & place marketing 1976–2016: A multidisciplinary literature review," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 14(4), pages 447-473, December.
    2. Sinan Tankut Gülhan, 2022. "Neoliberalism and neo-dirigisme in action: The state–corporate alliance and the great housing rush of the 2000s in Istanbul, Turkey," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(7), pages 1443-1458, May.
    3. Zenzile E. Mbinza, 2024. "Connecting place branding to social and governance constructs in Johannesburg, South Africa," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 20(3), pages 408-423, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bahar Sakizlioğlu, 2014. "Inserting Temporality into the Analysis of Displacement: Living Under the Threat of Displacement," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(2), pages 206-220, April.
    2. Mahir Yazar & Dina Hestad & Diana Mangalagiu & Ali Kerem Saysel & Yuge Ma & Thomas F. Thornton, 2020. "From urban sustainability transformations to green gentrification: urban renewal in Gaziosmanpaşa, Istanbul," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 637-653, June.
    3. Gülçin Erdi Lelandais, 2014. "Space and Identity in Resistance against Neoliberal Urban Planning in Turkey," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1785-1806, September.
    4. Esin Özdemir & Ayda Eraydin, 2017. "Fragmentation in Urban Movements: The Role of Urban Planning Processes," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(5), pages 727-748, September.
    5. Cihan Tuğal, 2021. "Urban Symbolic Violence Re‐Made: Religion, Politics and Spatial Struggles in Istanbul," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 154-163, January.
    6. Cardullo, Paolo, 2018. "Commoning the smart city: A case for a public Internet provision," SocArXiv u8dk2, Center for Open Science.
    7. Sören Becker & James Angel & Matthias Naumann, 2020. "Energy democracy as the right to the city: Urban energy struggles in Berlin and London," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(6), pages 1093-1111, September.
    8. Albert Fu, 2016. "Neoliberalism, logistics and the treadmill of production in metropolitan waste management: A case of Turkish firms," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(10), pages 2099-2117, August.
    9. Hyun Bang Shin, 2011. "Right to the city and critical reflections on property rights activism in China’s urban renewal contexts," CASE Papers case156, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    10. Gillad Rosen & Anne B. Shlay, 2014. "Whose Right to Jerusalem?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 935-950, May.
    11. Witten, Karen & Kearns, Robin & Carroll, Penelope, 2015. "Urban inclusion as wellbeing: Exploring children's accounts of confronting diversity on inner city streets," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 349-357.
    12. Coskun, Yener, 2011. "Does re-design of the policies on housing finance and supply help to solve housing question of Turkey?," MPRA Paper 31729, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Walter Alando & Joachim Scheiner, 2016. "Framing Social Inclusion as a Benchmark for Cycling-Inclusive Transport Policy in Kisumu, Kenya," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(3), pages 46-60.
    14. Youjeong Oh, 2023. "AGAINST THE COLONIZATION OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT: The Top‐dong Right to the City Movement in Jeju, South Korea," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 425-443, May.
    15. Osborne, Natalie & Grant-Smith, Deanna, 2017. "Constructing the cycling citizen: A critical analysis of policy imagery in Brisbane, Australia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 44-53.
    16. Cengiz, Serhat & Atmiş, Erdoğan & Görmüş, Sevgi, 2019. "The impact of economic growth oriented development policies on landscape changes in Istanbul Province in Turkey," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    17. repec:cep:sticas:/156 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. O'Neill, Ella & Cole, Helen V.S. & García-Lamarca, Melissa & Anguelovski, Isabelle & Gullón, Pedro & Triguero-Mas, Margarita, 2023. "The right to the unhealthy deprived city: An exploration into the impacts of state-led redevelopment projects on the determinants of mental health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    19. Eric K Chu, 2018. "Urban climate adaptation and the reshaping of state–society relations: The politics of community knowledge and mobilisation in Indore, India," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(8), pages 1766-1782, June.
    20. Nathan McClintock & Michael Simpson, 2018. "Stacking functions: identifying motivational frames guiding urban agriculture organizations and businesses in the United States and Canada," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 35(1), pages 19-39, March.
    21. Shin, Hyun Bang, 2011. "Right to the city and critical reflections on property rights activism in China’s urban renewal contexts," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 41898, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ijurrs:v:39:y:2015:i:2:p:284-304. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0309-1317 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.