IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/glopol/v14y2023i5p938-948.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional isomorphism in corporate Twitter discourse on citizenship and immigration in India and the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Shehla Rashid Shora
  • Arshia Arya
  • Joyojeet Pal

Abstract

High net‐worth individuals (HNIs) play important roles in influencing policy through their voices. Technology‐mediated means of addressing issues, such as social media activism, have become a central part of such policy advocacy. We examined the Twitter engagement of the 50 wealthiest individuals and their ‘networks’ in India and the United States, specifically their engagement with citizens' movements and policy issues related to citizenship and immigration, with a focus on debates triggered by the enactment of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and rescission of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), respectively. We quantified the level of engagement of ‘HNI networks’ with these debates through a textual analysis of their tweets using computational methods combined with manual annotation, followed by qualitative analysis and comparison of subjective meanings attached by actors to key terms. We found that American HNIs leveraged their social media presence to advocate for inclusive immigration and naturalisation policies, their model of advocacy characterised by confrontation, collective action and ownership by key actors, thus exhibiting mimetic isomorphism. Indian HNIs' tweets on CAA were few and far between, with no call for change and no evidence of either collective action or individual ownership, and a hesitation to challenge the central government, thus exhibiting coercive isomorphism.

Suggested Citation

  • Shehla Rashid Shora & Arshia Arya & Joyojeet Pal, 2023. "Institutional isomorphism in corporate Twitter discourse on citizenship and immigration in India and the United States," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(5), pages 938-948, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:14:y:2023:i:5:p:938-948
    DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.13241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13241
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1758-5899.13241?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Marquis & András Tilcsik, 2016. "Institutional Equivalence: How Industry and Community Peers Influence Corporate Philanthropy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1325-1341, October.
    2. Swati Agarwal & Sayantani Sarkar, 2022. "Topical analysis of migration coverage during lockdown in India by mainstream print media," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-19, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Mohr & Christian Schumacher, 2019. "The Contingent Effect of Patriotic Rhetoric on Firm Performance," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(2), pages 94-110, June.
    2. Jeong, Nara & Kim, Nari & Arthurs, Jonathan D., 2021. "The CEO’s tenure life cycle, corporate social responsibility and the moderating role of the CEO’s political orientation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 464-474.
    3. Yusen Dong & Senhua Chen & Yixue Wu, 2023. "Keeping up with the Joneses: The role of investee peers corporate environmental responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1841-1855, July.
    4. Yang, Guang & Huang, Ruixian & Shi, Yukun & Jia, Zhehao, 2021. "Does a CEO's private reputation impede corporate governance?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    5. Licheng Yang & Shijie Song & Chunlin Liu, 2024. "Green signals: The impact of environmental protection support policies on firms' green innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3258-3278, May.
    6. Jiao Luo & Aseem Kaul & Haram Seo, 2018. "Winning us with trifles: Adverse selection in the use of philanthropy as insurance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(10), pages 2591-2617, October.
    7. Samuel Adomako & Mai Dong Tran, 2024. "Beyond profits: The linkages between local embeddedness, social legitimacy, and corporate philanthropy in the mining industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 555-565, January.
    8. Mirna Amirya, 2019. "What Drives the Institutionalization of Performance Measurement Systems in Indonesian Local Government?," GATR Journals jber166, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    9. Liu, Yang & Ouyang, Zhe & He, Mujia, 2022. "Why and when firms respond accommodatively to the product-harm crisis: An institutional perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    10. Heli Wang & Ming Jia & Zhe Zhang, 2021. "Good Deeds Done in Silence: Stakeholder Management and Quiet Giving by Chinese Firms," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 649-674, May.
    11. Wang, Yanzhi, 2023. "Trade secrets laws and technology spillovers," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(7).
    12. Yuanyuan Hu & Shouming Chen & Runshi Liu & Yi Dai, 2023. "Managers’ aspirations and quality of CSR reports: evidence from China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    13. Yi Xiang & Ming Jia & Zhe Zhang, 2022. "Hiding in the Crowd: Government Dependence on Firms, Management Costs of Political Legitimacy, and Modest Imitation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(4), pages 629-646, April.
    14. Haram Seo & Jiao Luo & Aseem Kaul, 2021. "Giving a little to many or a lot to a few? The returns to variety in corporate philanthropy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(9), pages 1734-1764, September.
    15. Shan Xue & Yuehua Xu & Honghui Chen, 2024. "Corporate social performance feedback and corporate social responsibility decoupling in China: The salience of legitimacy and/or efficiency," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 3164-3180, July.
    16. Xiaowei Ma & Wanwan Ma & Xin Zhao & Xiaoxiao Zhou & Kamel Si Mohammed, 2024. "Increasing Burdens or Reducing Costs: Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Cost Stickiness," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 2136-2155, March.
    17. Russo, Michael V. & Earle, Andrew G. & Lahneman, Brooke A. & Tilleman, Suzanne G., 2022. "Taking root in fertile ground: Community context and the agglomeration of hybrid companies," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 37(2).
    18. Joo Hun Han & DuckJung Shin & William G. Castellano, & Alison M. Konrad & Douglas L. Kruse & Joseph R. Blasi, 2020. "Creating Mutual Gains to Leverage a Racially Diverse Workforce: The Effects of Firm-Level Racial Diversity on Financial and Workforce Outcomes Under the Use of Broad-Based Stock Options," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 1515-1537, November.
    19. Tortorella, Guilherme Luz & Narayanamurthy, Gopalakrishnan & Sunder M, Vijaya & Cauchick-Miguel, Paulo A, 2021. "Operations Management teaching practices and information technologies adoption in emerging economies during COVID-19 outbreak," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    20. Shuhan Chen & Lerong He & Guangqing Yang, 2024. "Corporate contribution to poverty alleviation: an integrated framework of willingness and ability," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(4), pages 570-596, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:glopol:v:14:y:2023:i:5:p:938-948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.