IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/eurcho/v21y2022i3p13-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy Instruments to Support Agroecological Transitions in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Oriana Gava
  • Andrea Povellato
  • Francesco Galioto
  • Jaroslav Pražan
  • Gerald Schwarz
  • Alba Linares Quero
  • Uxue Yoldi Iragui
  • Carlos Astrain Massa
  • Andis Zīlāns
  • Johannes Carolus

Abstract

Agroecological transitions have the potential to deliver multiple environmental and social benefits. However socio‐economic barriers have prevented those transitions in many European contexts. This article aims to inform policymakers about policy instruments that can foster agroecological transitions in Europe, especially by removing key socio‐economic barriers. A multi‐step methodology was carried out over a two‐year period in 15 case studies across Europe. The case studies represent farming systems that are in the process of initiating or enhancing the transition. Data collection relied on a participatory process, involving a variety of transdisciplinary actors. Study findings identify three major themes of barriers to agroecological transitions, namely actor capacity, value chain and policy. To address these barriers, policy instruments should consider the farming system’s stage in the transition pathway to take account of the different priorities of local actors. At the stage of initiating the transition, removing the barriers requires improvements in knowledge delivery mechanisms by strengthening advisory services and reducing decision‐makers’ uncertainty. At the stage of enhancing the transition, a focus on social capital is needed, for example by strengthening networking and cooperation measures. Generally, more attention towards state interventions which support the transitions to agroecology is needed, such as developing new voluntary agroecology certification schemes and public procurement initiatives. Les transitions agroécologiques pourraient apporter de multiples avantages environnementaux et sociaux. Des barrières socio‐économiques ont pourtant empêché ces transitions dans de nombreux contextes européens. Cet article vise à informer les décideurs sur les instruments d’action publique susceptible de favoriser les transitions agroécologiques en Europe, notamment en supprimant les principales barrières socio‐économiques. Une méthodologie en plusieurs étapes a été appliquée sur une période de deux ans dans 15 études de cas à travers l'Europe. Ces études de cas représentent des systèmes agricoles qui sont en train d'amorcer ou d'améliorer leur transition. La collecte de données s'est appuyée sur un processus participatif impliquant une variété d'acteurs transdisciplinaires. Les résultats de l'étude identifient trois grandes catégories d'obstacles aux transitions agroécologiques, à savoir la capacité des acteurs, la chaîne de valeur et l’intervention publique. Pour surmonter ces obstacles, les instruments d’action doivent tenir compte de l'étape vers la transition du système agricole afin de tenir compte des différentes priorités des acteurs locaux. Au stade du lancement de la transition, la suppression des obstacles nécessite des améliorations dans les mécanismes de diffusion des connaissances en renforçant les services de conseil et en réduisant l'incertitude des décideurs. Au stade de l'amélioration de la transition, il est nécessaire de mettre l'accent sur le capital social, par exemple en renforçant les mesures de mise en réseau et de coopération. En règle générale, il faut porter une plus grande attention aux interventions de l'État qui soutiennent les transitions vers l'agroécologie, telles que le développement de nouveaux programmes volontaires de certification agroécologique et des initiatives en matière de marchés publics. Der agrarökologische Wandel hat das Potenzial, vielfältige ökologische und soziale Vorteile zu bringen. Allerdings haben sozioökonomische Barrieren diese Umstellung in vielen europäischen Zusammenhängen verhindert. Ziel dieses Artikels ist es, politische Entscheidungsträger über politische Instrumente zu informieren, die den agrarökologischen Wandel in Europa fördern können, insbesondere durch die Beseitigung zentraler sozioökonomischer Hindernisse. Eine mehrstufige Methodik wurde über einen Zeitraum von zwei Jahren in 15 Fallstudien in ganz Europa angewandt. Bei den Fallstudien handelt es sich um landwirtschaftliche Systeme, die sich in der Phase der Umstellung befinden oder diese vorantreiben. Die Datenerhebung stützte sich auf einen partizipativen Prozess, an dem eine Vielzahl von transdisziplinären Akteuren beteiligt war. Die Ergebnisse der Studie zeigen drei Hauptthemen von Hindernissen für agrarökologische Umstellungen auf, nämlich die Kapazitäten der Akteure, die Wertschöpfungskette und die Politik. Um diese Hindernisse zu beseitigen, sollten die politischen Instrumente das Stadium des landwirtschaftlichen Systems auf dem Übergangspfad berücksichtigen, sodass den unterschiedlichen Prioritäten der lokalen Akteure Rechnung getragen wird. In der Einleitungsphase des Übergangs erfordert die Beseitigung der Barrieren eine Verbesserung der Mechanismen zur Wissensvermittlung, indem die Beratungsdienste gestärkt und die Unsicherheit der Entscheidungsträger verringert werden. In der Phase der Festigung des Übergangs muss der Schwerpunkt auf das soziale Kapital gelegt werden, beispielsweise durch die Stärkung von Netzwerken und Kooperationsmaßnahmen. Generell ist mehr Aufmerksamkeit für die staatlichen Interventionen erforderlich die den Übergang zur Agrarökologie unterstützen, wie z.B. die Entwicklung neuer freiwilliger agrarökologischer Zertifizierungssysteme und öffentlicher Beschaffungsinitiativen.

Suggested Citation

  • Oriana Gava & Andrea Povellato & Francesco Galioto & Jaroslav Pražan & Gerald Schwarz & Alba Linares Quero & Uxue Yoldi Iragui & Carlos Astrain Massa & Andis Zīlāns & Johannes Carolus, 2022. "Policy Instruments to Support Agroecological Transitions in Europe," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 13-20, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:21:y:2022:i:3:p:13-20
    DOI: 10.1111/1746-692X.12367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12367
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1746-692X.12367?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anita Wreford & Ada Ignaciuk & Guillaume Gruère, 2017. "Overcoming barriers to the adoption of climate-friendly practices in agriculture," OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers 101, OECD Publishing.
    2. Puech, Camille & Brulaire, Arnaud & Paraiso, Jérôme & Faloya, Vincent, 2021. "Collective design of innovative agroecological cropping systems for the industrial vegetable sector," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. Swagemakers, Paul & Schermer, Markus & Domínguez García, María Dolores & Milone, Pierluigi & Ventura, Flaminia, 2021. "To what extent do brands contribute to sustainability transition in agricultural production practices? Lessons from three European case studies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Galioto, Francesco & Nino, Pasquale, 2023. "Investigating the reasons behind the choice to promote crop diversification practices through the new CAP reform in Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    2. Luca Simone Rizzo & Raffaela Gabriella Rizzo & Antonella Trabuio, 2024. "Tourist Itineraries, Food, and Rural Development: A Critical Understanding of Rural Policy Performance in Northeast Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-27, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wreford, Anita & Topp, Cairistiona F.E., 2020. "Impacts of climate change on livestock and possible adaptations: A case study of the United Kingdom," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. Dian Spear & Angela Chappel, 2018. "Livelihoods on the Edge without a Safety Net: The Case of Smallholder Crop Farming in North-Central Namibia," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-11, June.
    3. Ingrid Moons & Kristien Daems & Lorens L. J. Van de Velde, 2021. "Co-Creation as the Solution to Sustainability Challenges in the Greenhouse Horticultural Industry: The Importance of a Structured Innovation Management Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Marc Baudry & Edouard Civel & Camille Tévenart, 2023. "Land allocation and the adoption of innovative practices in agriculture: a real option modelling of the underlying hidden costs," EconomiX Working Papers 2023-1, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    5. Gianluca Stefani & Mario Biggeri & Lucia Ferrone, 2022. "Sustainable Transitions Narratives: An Analysis of the Literature through Topic Modelling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
    6. Kathage, Jonas & Smit, Bert & Janssens, Bas & Haagsma, Wiepie & Adrados, Jose Luis, 2022. "How much is policy driving the adoption of cover crops? Evidence from four EU regions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    7. Sam Van Hoof, 2023. "Climate Change Mitigation in Agriculture: Barriers to the Adoption of Carbon Farming Policies in the EU," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Ignacio Perez Dominguez & Thomas Fellmann & Peter Witzke & Franz Weiss & Jordan Hristov & Mihaly Himics & Jesus Barreiro-Hurle & Manuel Gomez Barbero & Adrian Leip, 2020. "Economic assessment of GHG mitigation policy options for EU agriculture: A closer look at mitigation options and regional mitigation costs (EcAMPA 3)," JRC Research Reports JRC120355, Joint Research Centre.
    9. Hongyu Wang & Apurbo Sarkar & Lu Qian, 2021. "Evaluations of the Roles of Organizational Support, Organizational Norms and Organizational Learning for Adopting Environmentally Friendly Technologies: A Case of Kiwifruit Farmers’ Cooperatives of Me," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23, March.
    10. Maleki, Tahereh & Koohestani, Hossein & Keshavarz, Marzieh, 2022. "Can climate-smart agriculture mitigate the Urmia Lake tragedy in its eastern basin?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    11. Zhen, Huayang & Qiao, Yuhui & Zhao, Haijun & Ju, Xuehai & Zanoli, Raffaele & Waqas, Muhammad Ahmed & Lun, Fei & Knudsen, Marie Trydeman, 2022. "Developing a conceptual model to quantify eco-compensation based on environmental and economic cost-benefit analysis for promoting the ecologically intensified agriculture," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    12. David Miller & Sophie Legras & Andrew Barnes & Mara Cazacu & Oriana Gava & Janne Helin & Katherine Irvine & Jochen Kantelhardt & Jan Landert & Laure Latruffe & Andreas Mayer & Andreas Niedermayr & And, 2022. "Creating Conditions for Harnessing the Potential of Transitions to Agroecology in Europe and Requirements for Policy," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 72-79, December.
    13. Katherine Baldwin & Anne Effland, 2022. "Integrating prevention into the risk management policy toolkit: A strategy for improving resilience to extreme events," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(3), pages 1222-1240, September.
    14. Wang, Wei & AL-Huqail, Arwa & Ali, Elimam & Abbas, Mohamed & Assilzadeh, Hamid, 2024. "Analysis of the sustainability index for ecologically low-input integrated farming: A comprehensive assessment of environmental, economic, and social impact," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 493(C).
    15. Rossing, Walter A.H. & Dogliotti, Santiago & Martin, Guillaume, 2023. "Sustainability transitions in the making in agroecosystems: Changes in research scope and methods," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    16. Soto Golcher, Cinthia & Arts, Bas & Visseren-Hamakers, Ingrid, 2018. "Seeing the forest, missing the field: Forests and agriculture in global climate change policy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 627-640.
    17. Westermann, Olaf & Förch, Wiebke & Thornton, Philip & Körner, Jana & Cramer, Laura & Campbell, Bruce, 2018. "Scaling up agricultural interventions: Case studies of climate-smart agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 283-293.
    18. Fellmann, Thomas & Witzke, Heinz Peter & Weiss, Franz & Perez Dominguez, Ignacio & Barreiro-Hurle, Jesus & Himics, Mihaly & Salputra, Guna & Jansson, Torbjörn, 2017. "Assessing Impacts Of Activating The Technological Emission Mitigation Potential Of EU Agriculture," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 260918, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Kreft, Cordelia & Huber, Robert & Wuepper, David & Finger, Robert, 2021. "The role of non-cognitive skills in farmers' adoption of climate change mitigation measures," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    20. Ruggiero Sardaro & Nicola Faccilongo & Francesco Contò & Piermichele La Sala, 2021. "Adaption Actions to Cope with Climate Change: Evidence from Farmers’ Preferences on an Agrobiodiversity Conservation Programme in the Mediterranean Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-17, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:21:y:2022:i:3:p:13-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.