IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v133y2023ics0264837723003277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating the reasons behind the choice to promote crop diversification practices through the new CAP reform in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Galioto, Francesco
  • Nino, Pasquale

Abstract

The present study investigates the factors that might contribute influencing Member States decision to promote the adoption of crop diversification practices through their provisional National Strategic Plans for implementing the 2023–2027 Common Agricultural Policy. The Qualitative Comparative Analysis method is used to explore the link between key agricultural land uses and land use pressure indicators and the choice of funding the adoption of diversification practices and of imposing restrictions to access subsidies for their adoption. Results highlight that the choice of financing the adoption of diversification practices is associated with: the diffusion of cereal crops (share of cereals crops on the arable land above the median value of 20%), the diffusion of large farms (share of agricultural land for farms above 100 ha on the UAA above the median value of 10%) and the poor diffusion of grasslands (share of agricultural land cultivated with permanent grassland below the median value of 30%), mainly for eastern European countries, and with biodiversity pressures (share of biodiversity pressure indicators above the median value of 0.36), mainly for central European countries. Conversely, the choice of imposing high restrictions on the adoption of diversification practices is mainly associated with different form of land use pressures (nutrient leaching, biodiversity losses and soil erosion), mainly for southern European countries. Lack of financing and lack of restrictions remains unexplained for some MS (i.e., this is particularly evident for Sweeden and Finalnd) and apparently contradictory choices are highlighted for some others (i.e., financing the adoption of diversification practices with limited restrictions, which was addressed for France, Austria, Slovenia and Lithuania). The paper concludes providing a summary of the main findings, some policy recommendations to cope with existing shortcomings in current plans, due to excess flexibility and lack of coherence with existing priorities and highlighting the limits of the approach used and some proposal for further investigation.

Suggested Citation

  • Galioto, Francesco & Nino, Pasquale, 2023. "Investigating the reasons behind the choice to promote crop diversification practices through the new CAP reform in Europe," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:133:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723003277
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106861
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837723003277
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106861?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Galioto, Francesco & Musotti, Francesco, 2023. "The governance of agricultural lands in marginal areas: A conceptual framework," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    2. Lankoski, Jussi & Thiem, Alrik, 2020. "Linkages between agricultural policies, productivity and environmental sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    3. Arts, Bas & de Koning, Jessica, 2017. "Community Forest Management: An Assessment and Explanation of its Performance Through QCA," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 315-325.
    4. Oriana Gava & Andrea Povellato & Francesco Galioto & Jaroslav Pražan & Gerald Schwarz & Alba Linares Quero & Uxue Yoldi Iragui & Carlos Astrain Massa & Andis Zīlāns & Johannes Carolus, 2022. "Policy Instruments to Support Agroecological Transitions in Europe," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 13-20, December.
    5. Rosa-Schleich, Julia & Loos, Jacqueline & Mußhoff, Oliver & Tscharntke, Teja, 2019. "Ecological-economic trade-offs of Diversified Farming Systems – A review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 251-263.
    6. Ashok K. Mishra & Hisham S. El‐Osta & Carmen L. Sandretto, 2004. "Factors affecting farm enterprise diversification," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 64(2), pages 151-166, November.
    7. Gomathy Sethuraman & Nurul Amalina Mohd Zain & Sumiani Yusoff & Yin Mei Ng & Niranjan Baisakh & Acga Cheng, 2021. "Revamping Ecosystem Services through Agroecology—The Case of Cereals," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martín-García, Jaime & Gómez-Limón, José A. & Arriaza, Manuel, 2024. "Conversion to organic farming: Does it change the economic and environmental performance of fruit farms?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    2. Geng, Yuqing & Liu, Liwen & Chen, Lingyan, 2023. "Rural revitalization of China: A new framework, measurement and forecast," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. James P. Herrera & Jean Yves Rabezara & Ny Anjara Fifi Ravelomanantsoa & Miranda Metz & Courtni France & Ajilé Owens & Michelle Pender & Charles L. Nunn & Randall A. Kramer, 2021. "Food insecurity related to agricultural practices and household characteristics in rural communities of northeast Madagascar," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(6), pages 1393-1405, December.
    4. Radosław PASTUSIAK & Magdalena JASINIAK & Michał SOLIWODA & Joanna STAWSKA, 2017. "What may determine off-farm income? A review," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(8), pages 380-391.
    5. Sponagel, Christian & Bendel, Daniela & Angenendt, Elisabeth & Weber, Tobias Karl David & Gayler, Sebastian & Streck, Thilo & Bahrs, Enno, 2022. "Integrated assessment of regional approaches for biodiversity offsetting in urban-rural areas – A future based case study from Germany using arable land as an example," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    6. Arts, Bas & Brockhaus, Maria & Giessen, Lukas & McDermott, Constance L., 2024. "The performance of global forest governance: Three contrasting perspectives," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    7. Schiller, Josepha & Jänicke, Clemens & Reckling, Moritz & Ryo, Masahiro, 2024. "Higher crop rotational diversity in more simplified agricultural landscapes in Northeastern Germany," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 39(4).
    8. Kolady, Deepthi E. & Van Der Sluis, Evert, 2021. "Adoption Determinants of Precision Agriculture Technologies and Conservation Agriculture: Evidence from South Dakota," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(2), December.
    9. Rosa-Schleich, Julia & Loos, Jacqueline & Ferrante, Marco & Mußhoff, Oliver & Tscharntke, Teja, 2024. "Mixed farmers' perception of the ecological-economic performance of diversified farming," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    10. Nunan, Fiona & Menton, Mary & McDermott, Constance L. & Huxham, Mark & Schreckenberg, Kate, 2021. "How does governance mediate links between ecosystem services and poverty alleviation? Results from a systematic mapping and thematic synthesis of literature," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    11. Bas Arts & Jelle Behagel & Jessica de Koning & Marieke van der Zon, 2023. "Community Forest Management: Weak States or Strong Communities?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 336-345.
    12. Dong, Jiayun & Liang, Wenyuan & Fu, Yimin & Liu, Weiping & Managi, Shunsuke, 2021. "Impact of devolved forest tenure reform on formal credit access for households: Evidence from Fujian, China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 486-498.
    13. Long, Hexing & de Jong, Wil & Yiwen, Zhang & Liu, Jinlong, 2021. "Institutional choices between private management and user group management during forest devolution: A case study of forest allocation in China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    14. Jindrich Spicka & Tomas Hlavsa & Katerina Soukupova & Marie Stolbova, 2019. "Approaches to estimation the farm-level economic viability and sustainability in agriculture: A literature review," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(6), pages 289-297.
    15. Alain Carpentier & Ibirénoyé Honoré Romaric Sodjahin & Rémy Ballot, 2022. "On the economics of crop rotation diversification. Valuing pre crop and cropping system effects and accounting for opportunity costs," Post-Print hal-04793152, HAL.
    16. Conrad Baker & Albert Thembinkosi Modi & Adornis D. Nciizah, 2021. "Weeding Frequency Effects on Growth and Yield of Dry Bean Intercropped with Sweet Sorghum and Cowpea under a Dryland Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, November.
    17. Liangliang Yang & Sota Kamata & Yohei Hoshino & Yufei Liu & Chiaki Tomioka, 2024. "Development of EV Crawler-Type Weeding Robot for Organic Onion," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Khalep, Yurii & Moskalenko, Anatolii, 2020. "Ecological and economic aspects of the efficiency of Polissia organic plant models," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 6(4), December.
    19. Wirat Krasachat, 2023. "The Effect of Good Agricultural Practices on the Technical Efficiency of Chili Production in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, January.
    20. Takahashi, Ryo & Otsuka, Keijiro & Tilahun, Mesfin & Birhane, Emiru & Holden, Stein, 2024. "Beyond Ostrom: Randomized experiment of the impact of individualized tree rights on forest management in Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:133:y:2023:i:c:s0264837723003277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.