IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v42y2024i1ne12735.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uber's digital labour platform and labour relations in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Welmah N. Mutengwe
  • Adrino Mazenda
  • Moreblessing Simawu

Abstract

Motivation With rising unemployment in South Africa, new forms of digital work transcend legal conceptions and discourses on work. Uber's digital labour platform (DLP) has the potential to reduce unemployment and improve the livelihoods of South African households. Purpose We examine the nature of employment through digital platforms to assess how such employment conforms to labour law and regulation in South Africa, the responsibility of the Department of Employment and Labour (DEL). Methods and approach We review the literature on the gig economy, decent work, and labour relations. We examine Uber DLP in South Africa to assess its potential to create decent work given DEL's current labour regulations. We analyse factors that harm the relationship between Uber DLP and DEL. Findings Despite numerous constitutional provisions governing DLP and DEL, Uber DLP workers in South Africa are considered independent contractors not entitled to employee benefits. Uber DLP employees in South Africa make less than the national minimum wage after the platform deducts its fees. Few professional drivers own the cars they drive; they rent them from owners, known as “partners,” and split the earnings, meaning that the drivers earn very little. Policy implications DEL needs to establish a balance between flexibility and labour standards. DEL should preserve workers' rights and ensure financial stability in the digital age. Labour laws should be updated based on reliable data while considering the effects of digitally enabled employment on society and the economy. Platform workers need the same protection at work as other workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Welmah N. Mutengwe & Adrino Mazenda & Moreblessing Simawu, 2024. "Uber's digital labour platform and labour relations in South Africa," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 42(1), January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:42:y:2024:i:1:n:e12735
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12735
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.12735?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammad Amir Anwar & Mark Graham, 2020. "Digital labour at economic margins: African workers and the global information economy," Review of African Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(163), pages 95-105, July.
    2. Mark Graham & Isis Hjorth & Vili Lehdonvirta, 2017. "Digital labour and development: impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 23(2), pages 135-162, May.
    3. Katharina Bohnenberger, 2022. "Greening work: labor market policies for the environment," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 49(2), pages 347-368, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Agnieszka Piasna & Jan Drahokoupil, 2017. "Gender inequalities in the new world of work," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 23(3), pages 313-332, August.
    2. Nancy Worth & E. Alkim Karaagac, 2022. "Accounting for Absences and Ambiguities in the Freelancing Labour Relation," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 113(1), pages 96-108, February.
    3. Bohnenberger, Katharina, 2022. "Is it a green or brown job? A Taxonomy of Sustainable Employment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    4. Moritz Altenried, 2024. "Mobile workers, contingent labour: Migration, the gig economy and the multiplication of labour," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 56(4), pages 1113-1128, June.
    5. Alexander Oluka, 2024. "The impact of digital platforms on traditional market structures," Technology audit and production reserves, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 2(4(76)), pages 21-29, April.
    6. Maj Grasten & Leonard Seabrooke & Duncan Wigan, 2023. "Legal affordances in global wealth chains: How platform firms use legal and spatial scaling," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 55(4), pages 1062-1079, June.
    7. Manning, Stephan, 2022. "From mainstream to niche: How value regimes shift in emerging economy upgrading," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    8. Sandra Bilek-Steindl & Claudia Kettner & Christine Mayrhuber, 2022. "Special Issue: Sustainability, Work and Growth in the Context of SDG 8," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 49(2), pages 277-279, May.
    9. Naudé, Wim & Bray, Amy & Lee, Celina, 2021. "Crowdsourcing Artificial Intelligence in Africa: Findings from a Machine Learning Contest," IZA Discussion Papers 14545, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    10. Marios Kokkodis, 2021. "Dynamic, Multidimensional, and Skillset-Specific Reputation Systems for Online Work," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 688-712, September.
    11. Ryan Edwards & Daniel Suryadarma, 2022. "Introduction to the special issue on social and economic impacts of online marketplaces on women in Asia," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 217-221, September.
    12. Francesca Bellesia & Elisa Mattarelli & Fabiola Bertolotti, 2023. "Algorithms and their Affordances: How Crowdworkers Manage Algorithmic Scores in Online Labour Markets," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 1-37, January.
    13. Cirillo, Valeria & Guarascio, Dario & Parolin, Zachary, 2023. "Platform work and economic insecurity in Italy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 126-138.
    14. Helwing Veronique & Verfürth Philip & Franz Martin, 2023. "Trucking (un)limited – the impact of digital platforms on labour in production networks of logistics," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 67(4), pages 177-188, December.
    15. Geert De Neve & Kaveri Medappa & Rebecca Prentice, 2023. "India’s Gig Economy Workers at the Time of Covid-19: An Introduction," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 18(3), pages 343-358, December.
    16. Paul Langley & Andrew Leyshon, 2023. "FinTech platform regulation: regulating with/against platforms in the UK and China," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(2), pages 257-268.
    17. Prasetyo, Eko Heru, 2024. "Digital platforms’ strategies in Indonesia: Navigating between technology and informal economy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    18. Iazzolino, Gianluca, 2021. "Going Karura: colliding subjectivities and labour struggle in Nairobi’s gig economy," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110950, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Sonia Maria Guedes Gondim & Laila Carneiro & Valentina Viego & Erico Rentería-Pérez & Diana Cifuentes-Leiton & Daniela Moscon & Elisa Ansoleaga & Esteban Agulló-Tomás, 2024. "Effects of Flexibility on Digital Platform-Mediated Work in Five Ibero-American Countries," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, June.
    20. Paula McDonald & Penny Williams & Robyn Mayes & Maria Khan, 2024. "Income generation on care work digital labour platforms," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 62(2), pages 358-380, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:42:y:2024:i:1:n:e12735. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.