IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/canjag/v72y2024i3p271-283.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trade‐agreement compensation in supply‐managed industries

Author

Listed:
  • Ryan Cardwell
  • Scott Biden

Abstract

Recent Canadian preferential trade agreements (PTAs) include increased market access for imports of supply‐managed products (dairy and poultry). Such agreements are typically expected to create trade flows and increase supply of relatively low‐priced products in Canada. Industry groups representing Canadian producers and processors of supply‐managed products negotiated to receive approximately C$5 billion in payments from the federal government as compensation for the prospects of facing more international competition and reduced domestic sales. We discuss partial‐equilibrium simulation models that are commonly used by academics and governments to project market effects of new trade agreements, and conceptually illustrate how different assumptions about import supply conditions generate different projected market outcomes. We focus on the quota fill rates of new access commitments—most studies, including those used to inform government policies on compensation payments, assume imports increase in an amount equal to new commitments. This is often not the case, including with recent Canadian trade agreements. We apply a conceptual framework to Canada's supply‐management industry by re‐simulating a quantitative model of the Canadian dairy industry with updated information on implementation and quota fill rates. Projected market effects of trade agreements under the assumption of full import quotas are markedly different from projections that account for unfilled quotas. We discuss the political economy and welfare implications of compensation payments in light of our analysis. Les récents accords commerciaux préférentiels canadiens comprennent un accès accru au marché pour les importations de produits soumis à la gestion de l'offre (lait et volaille). On s'attend généralement à ce que de tels accords créent des flux commerciaux et augmentent l'offre de produits à prix relativement bas au Canada. Des groupes industriels représentant les producteurs et transformateurs canadiens de produits soumis à la gestion de l'offre ont négocié afin d'obtenir environ 5 milliards de dollars canadiens en paiements du gouvernement fédéral en guise de compensation pour la perspective de faire face à une concurrence internationale accrue et à une réduction des ventes intérieures. Nous discutons des modèles de simulation d’équilibre partiel qui sont couramment utilisés par les universitaires et les gouvernements pour projeter les effets sur le marché des nouveaux accords commerciaux, et illustrons conceptuellement comment différentes hypothèses sur les conditions de l'offre d'importations génèrent différents résultats projetés sur le marché. Nous nous concentrons sur les taux d'utilisation des quotas des nouveaux engagements d'accès : la plupart des études, y compris celles utilisées pour éclairer les politiques gouvernementales sur les paiements de compensation, supposent que les importations augmentent d'un montant égal aux nouveaux engagements. Ce n'est souvent pas le cas, notamment dans le cas des récents accords commerciaux canadiens. Nous appliquons un cadre conceptuel à l'industrie canadienne de la gestion de l'offre en simulant à nouveau un modèle quantitatif de l'industrie laitière canadienne avec des informations mises à jour sur la mise en œuvre et les taux d'utilisation des quotas. Les effets projetés des accords commerciaux sur le marché dans l'hypothèse de quotas d'importation complets sont nettement différents des projections prenant en compte les quotas non remplis. Nous discutons des implications sur l’économie politique et le bien‐être des paiements d'indemnisation à la lumière de notre analyse.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryan Cardwell & Scott Biden, 2024. "Trade‐agreement compensation in supply‐managed industries," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 72(3), pages 271-283, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:canjag:v:72:y:2024:i:3:p:271-283
    DOI: 10.1111/cjag.12337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12337
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/cjag.12337?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pascal L. Ghazalian, 2017. "The Effects of NAFTA/CUSFTA on Agricultural Trade Flows: An Empirical Investigation," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 65(2), pages 219-248, June.
    2. Trebilcock, Michael J., 2014. "Dealing with Losers: The Political Economy of Policy Transitions," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199370658.
    3. Scott Biden & Alan P. Ker & Stephen Duff, 2020. "Impacts of trade liberalization in Canada's supply managed dairy industry," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(4), pages 535-552, July.
    4. James Rude & Henry An, 2013. "Trans-Pacific Partnership: Implications for the Canadian Industrial Dairy Sector," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 39(3), pages 393-410, September.
    5. Jafari, Yaghoob & Britz, Wolfgang & Guimbard, Houssein & Beckman, Jayson, 2021. "Properly capturing tariff rate quotas for trade policy analysis in computable general equilibrium models," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    6. Juanita Rafajlovic & Ryan Cardwell, 2013. "The Effects of a New WTO Agreement on Canada's Chicken Market: A Differentiated Products Modeling Approach," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 61(4), pages 487-507, December.
    7. Steven S. Zahniser & Daniel Pick & Greg Pompelli & Mark J. Gehlhar, 2002. "Regionalism in the Western Hemisphere and Its Impact on U.S. Agricultural Exports: A Gravity-Model Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 84(3), pages 791-797.
    8. James I. Rude & Jean‐Philippe Gervais, 2006. "Tariff‐Rate Quota Liberalization: The Case of World Price Uncertainty and Supply Management," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 54(1), pages 33-54, March.
    9. Pascal L. Ghazalian & Bruno Larue & Jean‐Philippe Gervais, 2011. "Assessing the implications of regional preferential market access for meat commodities," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 292-310, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Colin A. Carter & Pierre Mérel, 2016. "Hidden costs of supply management in a small market," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 49(2), pages 555-588, May.
    2. Jayson Beckman & Steven Zahniser, 2018. "The effects on intraregional agricultural trade of ending NAFTA's market access provisions," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 66(4), pages 599-612, December.
    3. Wainio, John & Dyck, John & Meade, Birgit Gisela Saager & Mitchell, Lorrarine & Zahniser, Steven & Arita, Shawn & Beckman, Jayson F. & Burfisher, Mary E., 2014. "Agriculture in the Trans-Pacific Partnership," Economic Research Report 188429, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Thomas L. Vollrath & Mark J. Gehlhar & Charles B. Hallahan, 2009. "Bilateral Import Protection, Free Trade Agreements, and Other Factors Influencing Trade Flows in Agriculture and Clothing," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(2), pages 298-317, June.
    5. Marie M Stack & Rob Ackrill & Martin Bliss, 2019. "Sugar trade and the role of historical colonial linkages," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 46(1), pages 79-108.
    6. Jayson Beckman & Noé J. Nava & Angelica S. Williams & Steven Zahniser, 2024. "Land competition and welfare effects from Mexico's proposal to ban genetically engineered corn," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(3), pages 1300-1325, May.
    7. Marcin Pigłowski, 2021. "The Intra-European Union Food Trade with the Relation to the Notifications in the Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Wendkouni Jean‐Baptiste Zongo & Bruno Larue & Carl Gaigné, 2023. "On export duration puzzles," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(2), pages 453-478, March.
    9. Yoon Heo & Nguyen Khanh Doanh, 2020. "Is NAFTA Trade‐Creating or Trade‐Diverting? A System GMM Approach," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 39(3), pages 222-238, September.
    10. Abbassi Abdessalem & Gervais Jean-Philippe, 2010. "Evaluating Reforms in Canadian Chicken Marketing Mechanisms Using a Linear-Quadratic Inventory Model," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-24, February.
    11. Margherita Scoppola, 2010. "The Liberalisation of Tariff Rate Quotas under Oligopolistic Competition," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 584-604, September.
    12. Beckman, Jayson & Ivanic, Maros & Shaik, Saleem, 2023. "How bilateral trade deals get in the way of multilateral agreements: Why WTO is marginalized," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 877-894.
    13. Anne‐Célia Disdier & Carl Gaigné & Cristina Herghelegiu, 2023. "Do standards improve the quality of traded products?," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(4), pages 1238-1290, November.
    14. Feng, Kuishuang & Hubacek, Klaus & Liu, Yu & Marchán, Estefanía & Vogt-Schilb, Adrien, 2018. "Managing the distributional effects of energy taxes and subsidy removal in Latin America and the Caribbean," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 424-436.
    15. Amit Tzur, 2019. "Uber Über regulation? Regulatory change following the emergence of new technologies in the taxi market," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(3), pages 340-361, September.
    16. Lambert, Remy, 2012. "A Primer on the Economics of Supply Management and Food Supply Chains," Working Papers 125246, Structure and Performance of Agriculture and Agri-products Industry (SPAA).
    17. Ryan Cardwell & William A. Kerr, 2021. "President Biden's international trade agenda: Implications for the Canadian agrifood sector," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 69(1), pages 19-25, March.
    18. Antonioli, Federico & Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano, 2022. "On Policy Interventions and Vertical Price Transmission: The Italian Milk Supply Chain Case," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 47(2), May.
    19. Mario Larch & Jeff Luckstead & Yoto V. Yotov, 2024. "Economic sanctions and agricultural trade," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(4), pages 1477-1517, August.
    20. Burfisher, Mary E. & Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2004. "Regionalism," MTID discussion papers 65, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:canjag:v:72:y:2024:i:3:p:271-283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caefmea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.