IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v29y2020i8p3542-3554.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From institutional pressure to the sustainable development of firm: Role of environmental management accounting implementation and environmental proactivity

Author

Listed:
  • Naveed Iqbal Chaudhry
  • Muhammad Amir

Abstract

The current study purposes to assess the impact of institutional pressures (coercive, mimetic, and normative) on environmental performance of the firm along with the mediation of implementation of environmental management accounting and moderation of environmental proactivity between them. Quantitative data are collected through structured questionnaire from 500 middle‐level and top‐level managers and owners of manufacturing firms of Pakistan. Data are analyzed through SPSS and AMOS in which structural equation modeling in performed to assess hypotheses. Findings show that coercive, mimetic, and normative pressures are significant derivers of environmental performance. It is further found that coercive, mimetic, and normative pressures significantly enhance the implementation of environmental management accounting, which in turn enhances the environmental performance of the firm. Furthermore, environmental proactivity is found to be a significant moderator between mimetic pressure and environmental performance while no moderation by environmental proactivity is confirmed in relationships of coercive pressure and normative pressure with environmental performance. The current findings are anticipated to assist practitioners in strategy development and execution to improve environmental performance of the firm and policymaking to control environmental impacts of businesses and improve environmental conditions in the country. The current study is the first one to empirically examine the moderating role of environmental proactivity and mediating role of execution of environmental management accounting between institutional pressures and environmental performance in context of Pakistan; so, it will open new areas of discussion and analysis for researchers in the domain of institutional theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Naveed Iqbal Chaudhry & Muhammad Amir, 2020. "From institutional pressure to the sustainable development of firm: Role of environmental management accounting implementation and environmental proactivity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3542-3554, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:29:y:2020:i:8:p:3542-3554
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.2595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2595
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.2595?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shamim Tashakor & Ranjith Appuhami & Rahat Munir, 2019. "Environmental management accounting practices in Australian cotton farming," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(4), pages 1175-1202, May.
    2. Ozlem Ayaz Arda & Erkan Bayraktar & Ekrem Tatoglu, 2019. "How do integrated quality and environmental management practices affect firm performance? Mediating roles of quality performance and environmental proactivity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 64-78, January.
    3. Thi Tam Le & Thi Mai Anh Nguyen & Thi Thu Hien Phan, 2019. "Environmental Management Accounting and Performance Efficiency in the Vietnamese Construction Material Industry—A Managerial Implication for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-32, September.
    4. Sidani, Yusuf & Al Ariss, Akram, 2014. "Institutional and corporate drivers of global talent management: Evidence from the Arab Gulf region," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 215-224.
    5. Zhu, Qinghua & Cordeiro, James & Sarkis, Joseph, 2012. "International and domestic pressures and responses of Chinese firms to greening," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 144-153.
    6. Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Chen, Jin & Del Giudice, Manlio & El-Kassar, Abdul-Nasser, 2019. "Environmental ethics, environmental performance, and competitive advantage: Role of environmental training," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 203-211.
    7. Ki‐Hoon Lee, 2011. "Motivations, barriers, and incentives for adopting environmental management (cost) accounting and related guidelines: a study of the republic of Korea," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 39-49, January.
    8. Franck Brulhart & Sandrine Gherra & Bertrand V. Quelin, 2019. "Do Stakeholder Orientation and Environmental Proactivity Impact Firm Profitability?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 25-46, August.
    9. Francesco Calza & Giorgia Profumo & Ilaria Tutore, 2016. "Corporate Ownership and Environmental Proactivity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(6), pages 369-389, September.
    10. Dubey, Rameshwar & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Samar Ali, Sadia, 2015. "Exploring the relationship between leadership, operational practices, institutional pressures and environmental performance: A framework for green supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 120-132.
    11. David G Hyatt & Nicholas Berente, 2017. "Substantive or Symbolic Environmental Strategies? Effects of External and Internal Normative Stakeholder Pressures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(8), pages 1212-1234, December.
    12. Shanyong Wang & Hualong Wang & Jing Wang, 2019. "Exploring the effects of institutional pressures on the implementation of environmental management accounting: Do top management support and perceived benefit work?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 233-243, January.
    13. Scott R. Colwell & Ashwin W. Joshi, 2013. "Corporate Ecological Responsiveness: Antecedent Effects of Institutional Pressure and Top Management Commitment and Their Impact on Organizational Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 73-91, February.
    14. Liu, Yang & Zhu, Qinghua & Seuring, Stefan, 2017. "Linking capabilities to green operations strategies: The moderating role of corporate environmental proactivity," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 182-195.
    15. Zhongju Liao, 2018. "Institutional pressure, knowledge acquisition and a firm's environmental innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 849-857, November.
    16. Azhar Susanto & Meiryani Meiryani, 2019. "Antecedents of Environmental Management Accounting and Environmental Performance: Evidence from Indonesian Small and Medium Enterprises," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(6), pages 401-407.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Musaab Alnaim & Abdelmoneim Bahyeldin Mohamed Metwally, 2024. "Institutional Pressures and Environmental Management Accounting Adoption: Do Environmental Strategy Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Dr. Muhammad Siddique & Dr. Muhammad Sarfraz Khan & Dr. Kamran Ali & Zunaira Maqsood, 2023. "Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Financial Performance: Evidence from Insurance Sector of Pakistan," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 9(3), pages 1-14.
    3. Banjo Roxas, 2022. "Eco‐innovations of firms: A longitudinal analysis of the roles of industry norms and proactive environmental strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 515-531, January.
    4. Marc Jourdaine & Philippe Loubet & Guido Sonnemann & Stéphane Trébucq, 2021. "The ABC‐LCA method for the integration of activity‐based costing and life cycle assessment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1735-1750, May.
    5. Khai, Dinh Cong & Thanh, Ngo Quang, 2021. "The impact of institutional pressures and top management regulations on firm performance," MPRA Paper 109673, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Petr Petera & Jaroslav Wagner & Renáta Pakšiová, 2021. "The Influence of Environmental Strategy, Environmental Reporting and Environmental Management Control System on Environmental and Economic Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Kaveh Asiaei & Nick Bontis & Raziye Alizadeh & Mehdi Yaghoubi, 2022. "Green intellectual capital and environmental management accounting: Natural resource orchestration in favor of environmental performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 76-93, January.
    8. Xiaocui Li & Nengmin Wang & Bin Jiang & Tao Jia, 2023. "Institutional pressures and proactive environmental strategy: The mediating effect of top managerial environment attitude and the moderating effect of new media pressure," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 6106-6123, December.
    9. Agus Joko Pramono & Suwarno & Firdaus Amyar & Renny Friska, 2023. "Sustainability Management Accounting in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals: The Role of Performance Auditing in the Manufacturing Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-13, June.
    10. Kaveh Asiaei & Ruzita Jusoh & Omid Barani & Arash Asiaei, 2022. "How does green intellectual capital boost performance? The mediating role of environmental performance measurement systems," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1587-1606, May.
    11. Ning Liu & Haiqing Hu & Zhaoqun Wang, 2022. "The Relationship between Institutional Pressure, Green Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Entrepreneurial Performance—The Moderating Effect of Network Centrality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, September.
    12. Gabriela Iuliana Paraschiv (Ganea) & Mari-Isabella Stan, 2023. "Exploring the Impact of Companies’ Profiles on Environmental Activities," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 171-181, August.
    13. John Wiredu & Qian Yang & Agyemang Kwasi Sampene & Bright Akwasi Gyamfi & Simplice A. Asongu, 2024. "The effect of green supply chain management practices on corporate environmental performance: Does supply chain competitive advantage matter?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2578-2599, March.
    14. Silas Mukwarami & Chekani Nkwaira & Huibrecht Margaretha van der Poll, 2023. "Environmental Management Accounting Implementation Challenges and Supply Chain Management in Emerging Economies’ Manufacturing Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    15. Mehdi Bensouda & Mimoun Benali, 2023. "From Fairly Good to Optimal Energy Efficiency Practices within the Moroccan Manufacturing Sector: Are Financial Resources Sufficient?," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(3), pages 478-488, May.
    16. Wujuan Zhai & Florence Yean Yng Ling & Jiyong Ding & Zhuofu Wang, 2023. "Impact of Institutional Pressures on Socially Responsible Collective Action Behaviors for Major Water Transfer Projects," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(11), pages 4253-4269, September.
    17. Alghamdi, OmarA. & Agag, Gomaa, 2024. "Competitive advantage: A longitudinal analysis of the roles of data-driven innovation capabilities, marketing agility, and market turbulence," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mansour Alyahya & Meqbel Aliedan & Gomaa Agag & Ziad H. Abdelmoety, 2022. "Exploring the Link between Sustainable Development Practices, Institutional Pressures, and Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Yusheng Kong & Fahad Javed & Jahanzaib Sultan & Muhammad Shehzad Hanif & Noheed Khan, 2022. "EMA Implementation and Corporate Environmental Firm Performance: A Comparison of Institutional Pressures and Environmental Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, May.
    3. A.D. Nuwan Gunarathne & Ki‐Hoon Lee & Pubudu K. Hitigala Kaluarachchilage, 2021. "Institutional pressures, environmental management strategy, and organizational performance: The role of environmental management accounting," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 825-839, February.
    4. Nikunj Kumar Jain & Abinash Panda & Piyush Choudhary, 2020. "Institutional pressures and circular economy performance: The role of environmental management system and organizational flexibility in oil and gas sector," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3509-3525, December.
    5. Peter S. Hofman & Constantin Blome & Martin C. Schleper & Nachiappan Subramanian, 2020. "Supply chain collaboration and eco‐innovations: An institutional perspective from China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2734-2754, September.
    6. Huibrecht Margaretha van der Poll, 2022. "The barriers and drivers of environmental management accounting practices' adoption in developed and developing countries for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1222-1234, October.
    7. Yawen Gao & Jibao Gu & Hefu Liu, 2019. "Interactive effects of various institutional pressures on corporate environmental responsibility: Institutional theory and multilevel analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 724-736, July.
    8. Seles, Bruno Michel Roman Pais & de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes & Jabbour, Charbel José Chiappetta & Dangelico, Rosa Maria, 2016. "The green bullwhip effect, the diffusion of green supply chain practices, and institutional pressures: Evidence from the automotive sector," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 342-355.
    9. Abdul Majid & Muhammad Yasir & Muhammad Yasir & Asad Javed, 2020. "Nexus of institutional pressures, environmentally friendly business strategies, and environmental performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 706-716, March.
    10. Gomes, Paulo J. & Silva, Graça Miranda & Sarkis, Joseph, 2020. "Exploring the relationship between quality ambidexterity and sustainable production," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    11. Sayantan Khanra & Puneet Kaur & Rojers P Joseph & Ashish Malik & Amandeep Dhir, 2022. "A resource‐based view of green innovation as a strategic firm resource: Present status and future directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1395-1413, May.
    12. Ying Zhang & Yuting Guo & Aiman Nurdazym, 2023. "How do female CEOs affect corporate environmental policies?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 459-472, January.
    13. Hang Thu Nguyen & Tra Thi Dan Vu & Hiep Manh Nguyen & Michael Troege, 2022. "Political embeddedness and the adoption of environmental management practices: The mediating effects of institutional pressures," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 965-983, July.
    14. Yong Ming Wang & Waqar Ahmad & Muhammad Arshad & Hong Li Yin & Bilal Ahmed & Zulfiqar Ali, 2021. "Impact of Coordination, Psychological Safety, and Job Security on Employees’ Performance: The Moderating Role of Coercive Pressure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    15. Choudhary, Piyush & Kumar Jain, Nikunj & Panda, Abinash, 2022. "Making small and medium enterprises circular economy compliant by reducing the single use plastic consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 448-462.
    16. Dubey, Rameshwar & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Childe, Stephen J. & Papadopoulos, Thanos & Hazen, Benjamin & Giannakis, Mihalis & Roubaud, David, 2017. "Examining the effect of external pressures and organizational culture on shaping performance measurement systems (PMS) for sustainability benchmarking: Some empirical findings," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 63-76.
    17. Clement Nangpiire & Francis Oheneba Gyebi & Theophile Nasse, 2024. "Sustainable Procurement Practices and Organisational Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises in Ghana," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(1), pages 95-106, January.
    18. Zhang, Yixiang & Wei, Yimin & Zhou, Guanghui, 2018. "Promoting firms’ energy-saving behavior: The role of institutional pressures, top management support and financial slack," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 230-238.
    19. Jorge Alberto Esponda Perez & Faisal Ejaz & Sarmad Ejaz, 2023. "Green Transformational Leadership, GHRM, and Proenvironmental Behavior: An Effectual Drive to Environmental Performances of Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, March.
    20. John Wiredu & Qian Yang & Agyemang Kwasi Sampene & Bright Akwasi Gyamfi & Simplice A. Asongu, 2024. "The effect of green supply chain management practices on corporate environmental performance: Does supply chain competitive advantage matter?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2578-2599, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:29:y:2020:i:8:p:3542-3554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.