IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v30y2022i5p1222-1234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The barriers and drivers of environmental management accounting practices' adoption in developed and developing countries for sustainable development

Author

Listed:
  • Huibrecht Margaretha van der Poll

Abstract

Barriers and drivers of environmental management accounting practices' (EMAPs) adoption were compared between developed and developing countries. This may assist to promote adoption of EMAPs by targeting and overcoming applicable barriers while promoting drivers that are specific to their circumstances, leading to sustainable development ultimately. Methodology: A qualitative, six‐step systematic literature review (SLR) using ATLAS.ti 8 were employed. Four interdependent theories (institutional, contingency, legitimacy, and stakeholder) framed the SLR. Findings: developed countries have strong institutions that exert institutional isomorphic pressure on organisations to adopt EMAPs while developing countries with weaker institutions are hindered by low isomorphic pressure. Moreover, mimetic, and normative forces and contingent factors played a greater role in the adoption of EMAPs in developed countries, less important for developing countries. The findings may inform management who would want to enhance the environmental performance and sustainable development of their organisations and furthermore assist policymakers in developed and developing countries as they pursue environmental sustainability which is key to attaining the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UNSDGs) and Africa's Agenda 2063. Past studies investigated drivers and barriers in different countries however they did not distinguish between developed and developing countries. Since developed and developing countries have unique circumstances, this distinction exposes the different barriers and drivers.

Suggested Citation

  • Huibrecht Margaretha van der Poll, 2022. "The barriers and drivers of environmental management accounting practices' adoption in developed and developing countries for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 1222-1234, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:30:y:2022:i:5:p:1222-1234
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.2312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2312
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.2312?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nuwan Gunarathne & Ki-Hoon Lee, 2015. "Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) for environmental management and organizational change," Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(3), pages 362-383, September.
    2. H B P Chathurangani & K J S Madhusanka, 2019. "Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) Adoption Level among Listed Manufacturing Companies in Sri Lanka: Institutional Theory Perspective," Research in Social Sciences, Academia Publishing Group, vol. 2(1), pages 1-12.
    3. Thi Tam Le & Thi Mai Anh Nguyen & Thi Thu Hien Phan, 2019. "Environmental Management Accounting and Performance Efficiency in the Vietnamese Construction Material Industry—A Managerial Implication for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-32, September.
    4. repec:eme:aaaj00:09513571111098072 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Badar Latif & Zeeshan Mahmood & Ong Tze San & Ridzwana Mohd Said & Allah Bakhsh, 2020. "Coercive, Normative and Mimetic Pressures as Drivers of Environmental Management Accounting Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-14, June.
    6. Stefan Schaltegger, 2018. "Linking Environmental Management Accounting: A Reflection on (Missing) Links to Sustainability and Planetary Boundaries," Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 19-29, January.
    7. Dayana Jalaludin & Maliah Sulaiman & Nik Nazli Nik Ahmad, 2011. "Understanding environmental management accounting (EMA) adoption: a new institutional sociology perspective," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(4), pages 540-557, October.
    8. Susanne Baumann & Othmar M Lehner & Heimo Losbichler, 2015. "A push-and-pull factor model for environmental management accounting: a contingency perspective," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 155-177, July.
    9. Shanyong Wang & Hualong Wang & Jing Wang, 2019. "Exploring the effects of institutional pressures on the implementation of environmental management accounting: Do top management support and perceived benefit work?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 233-243, January.
    10. Wei Qian & Roger Burritt & Gary Monroe, 2011. "Environmental management accounting in local government," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(1), pages 93-128, January.
    11. Christ, Katherine L., 2014. "Water management accounting and the wine supply chain: Empirical evidence from Australia," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 379-396.
    12. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-09-2017-3145 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    14. Wei Qian & Roger Burritt & Gary Monroe, 2011. "Environmental management accounting in local government," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 24(1), pages 93-128, January.
    15. Nori Yani Abu Talib & Radziah Abdul Latiff & Aini Aman, 2020. "An institutional perspective for research inwaqfaccounting and reporting," Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(2), pages 400-427, January.
    16. Otley, David T., 1980. "The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 5(4), pages 413-428, October.
    17. Dayana Jalaludin & Maliah Sulaiman & Nik Nazli Nik Ahmad, 2011. "Understanding environmental management accounting (EMA) adoption: a new institutional sociology perspective," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 7(4), pages 540-557, October.
    18. Ki‐Hoon Lee, 2011. "Motivations, barriers, and incentives for adopting environmental management (cost) accounting and related guidelines: a study of the republic of Korea," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(1), pages 39-49, January.
    19. Mohammad Imtiaz Ferdous & Carol A. Adams & Gordon Boyce, 2019. "Institutional drivers of environmental management accounting adoption in public sector water organisations," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 32(4), pages 984-1012, May.
    20. Wei Qian & Roger Burritt & Jin Chen, 2015. "The potential for environmental management accounting development in China," Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(3), pages 406-428, September.
    21. Leontina Betianu & Sorin Briciu, 2010. "The Impact Of The Economic Crisis On Environmental Costs," Analele Stiintifice ale Universitatii "Alexandru Ioan Cuza" din Iasi - Stiinte Economice (1954-2015), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 2010, pages 3-14, july.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yusheng Kong & Fahad Javed & Jahanzaib Sultan & Muhammad Shehzad Hanif & Noheed Khan, 2022. "EMA Implementation and Corporate Environmental Firm Performance: A Comparison of Institutional Pressures and Environmental Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, May.
    2. A.D. Nuwan Gunarathne & Ki‐Hoon Lee & Pubudu K. Hitigala Kaluarachchilage, 2021. "Institutional pressures, environmental management strategy, and organizational performance: The role of environmental management accounting," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 825-839, February.
    3. Naveed Iqbal Chaudhry & Muhammad Amir, 2020. "From institutional pressure to the sustainable development of firm: Role of environmental management accounting implementation and environmental proactivity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3542-3554, December.
    4. Thi Tam Le & Thi Mai Anh Nguyen & Thi Thu Hien Phan, 2019. "Environmental Management Accounting and Performance Efficiency in the Vietnamese Construction Material Industry—A Managerial Implication for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-32, September.
    5. Musaab Alnaim & Abdelmoneim Bahyeldin Mohamed Metwally, 2024. "Institutional Pressures and Environmental Management Accounting Adoption: Do Environmental Strategy Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, April.
    6. Binh Bui & Carolyn Fowler, 2022. "Carbon controls in a New Zealand electricity utility: An application of theoretical triangulation," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(4), pages 4423-4451, December.
    7. Olivier E. Malay, 2021. "How to Articulate Beyond GDP and Businesses’ Social and Environmental Indicators?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 155(1), pages 1-25, May.
    8. Doorasamy Mishelle, 2015. "Staircase To Sustainable Development," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 7(1), pages 53-70, June.
    9. Nirman Noor Afiqi Mat Yusoh & Tuan Zainun Tuan Mat, 2020. "Environmental Management Accounting Adoption Barriers Among Malaysian Hotel Companies," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(3), pages 31-42, June.
    10. Burritt, Roger & Schaltegger, Stefan, 2014. "Accounting towards sustainability in production and supply chains," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 327-343.
    11. Abdalwali Lutfi & Hamza Alqudah & Mahmaod Alrawad & Ahmad Farhan Alshira’h & Malek Hamed Alshirah & Mohammed Amin Almaiah & Adi Alsyouf & Mohammed Faisal Hassan, 2023. "Green Environmental Management System to Support Environmental Performance: What Factors Influence SMEs to Adopt Green Innovations?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-20, July.
    12. Nuraddeen Abubakar Nuhu & Kevin Baird & Sophia Su, 2023. "The impact of interactive and diagnostic levers of eco‐control on eco‐innovation: The mediating role of employee environmental citizenship behaviour," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(2), pages 2245-2271, June.
    13. Jose Manuel Diaz‐Sarachaga, 2021. "Shortcomings in reporting contributions towards the sustainable development goals," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1299-1312, July.
    14. Olivier E. Malay, 2020. "How to articulate beyond GDP and businesses’ social and environmental indicators?," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 2020014, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
    15. Thuy Thanh Tran & Christian Herzig, 2020. "Material Flow Cost Accounting in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Xiaofang Chen & P.R. Weerathunga & Mohammad Nurunnabi & K.M.M.C.B. Kulathunga & W.H.M.S. Samarathunga, 2020. "Influences of Behavioral Intention to Engage in Environmental Accounting Practices for Corporate Sustainability: Managerial Perspectives from a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-30, June.
    17. Jiahao Gu & Liyuan Zheng & Changgao Cheng & Mengjiao Wang, 2023. "The Configuration Effect of Institutional Environment, Organizational Slack Resources, and Managerial Perceptions on the Corporate Water Responsibility of Small- and Medium-Sized Corporations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.
    18. Mashudu D. Mbedzi & Huibrecht M. Van der Poll & John A. Van der Poll, 2018. "An Information Framework for Facilitating Cost Saving of Environmental Impacts in the Coal Mining Industry in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, May.
    19. Stefan Schaltegger & Derk Loorbach & Jacob Hörisch, 2023. "Managing entrepreneurial and corporate contributions to sustainability transitions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(2), pages 891-902, February.
    20. Chris A. Kelsall, 2020. "Ecological Management Accounting—Taking into Account Sustainability, Does Accounting Have Far to Travel?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-20, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:30:y:2022:i:5:p:1222-1234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.