IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/2019-06-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Antecedents of Environmental Management Accounting and Environmental Performance: Evidence from Indonesian Small and Medium Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Azhar Susanto

    (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Padjadjaran University, Bandung, Indonesia,)

  • Meiryani Meiryani

    (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Communication, Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta, Indonesia.)

Abstract

Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) play a significant role in Indonesian business growth. Therefore, the objective of the present study is to investigate the association of antecedents of environmental management accounting and environmental performance in Indonesian SMEs. In doing so, the current study seeks to identify the internal and external influencing factors for firms in adopting EMA and its subsequent impact on SMEs environmental performance. The outcomes of the PLS-SEM confirm that benefit expectation has significantly and positively impacted on Environmental Management Accounting. The results of PLS-SEM also confirm that Regulatory Pressure has a positive and significant impact on environmental management accounting. Finally, the results of partial least square modelling confirm that environmental management accounting also has a positive and significant impact on environmental performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Azhar Susanto & Meiryani Meiryani, 2019. "Antecedents of Environmental Management Accounting and Environmental Performance: Evidence from Indonesian Small and Medium Enterprises," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(6), pages 401-407.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2019-06-48
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/8366/4707
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/8366/4707
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Azlan Amran & A.K. Siti‐Nabiha, 2009. "Corporate social reporting in Malaysia: a case of mimicking the West or succumbing to local pressure," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 5(3), pages 358-375, July.
    2. Christine M Chan & Shige Makino, 2007. "Legitimacy and multi-level institutional environments: implications for foreign subsidiary ownership structure," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 38(4), pages 621-638, July.
    3. Petra Christmann & Glen Taylor, 2001. "Globalization and the Environment: Determinants of Firm Self-Regulation in China," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 32(3), pages 439-458, September.
    4. Peggy Brønn & Deborah Vidaver-Cohen, 2009. "Corporate Motives for Social Initiative: Legitimacy, Sustainability, or the Bottom Line?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 91-109, April.
    5. Doran, Justin & Ryan, Geraldine, 2012. "Regulation and Firm Perception, Eco-Innovation and Firm Performance," MPRA Paper 44578, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Naveed Iqbal Chaudhry & Muhammad Amir, 2020. "From institutional pressure to the sustainable development of firm: Role of environmental management accounting implementation and environmental proactivity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3542-3554, December.
    2. Piotr Kafel & Krzysztof Rudziński, 2024. "The Importance of the Circular Economy Concept among Organizations within the Food Sector and a Management Systems Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Harmon Chaniago, 2022. "The effect innovation cloning to small business success: entrepreneurial perspective," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Quang Linh Huynh & Tran Thi Ngoc Lan, 2021. "Importance of Environmentally Managerial Accounting to Environmental and Economic Performance," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(5), pages 381-388.
    5. Quang Linh Huynh & Van Kha Nguyen, 2024. "The Role of Environmental Management Accounting in Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-21, August.
    6. Mutasim Asa’d & Wan Norhayati Wan Ahmad & Hazeline Ayoup, 2024. "Environmental Management Accounting Information and Environmental Performance, the Mediating Effect of Environmental Decision Quality," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(2), pages 562-573, March.
    7. Mansour Alyahya & Meqbel Aliedan & Gomaa Agag & Ziad H. Abdelmoety, 2022. "Exploring the Link between Sustainable Development Practices, Institutional Pressures, and Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kwak, Jooyoung & Zhang, Yue & Yu, Jiang, 2019. "Legitimacy building and e-commerce platform development in China: The experience of Alibaba," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 115-124.
    2. Phu Nguyen-Van & Tuyen Tiet & Quoc Tran-Nam, 2024. "Synergy in environmental compliance, innovation and export on SMEs' growth," Working Papers hal-04441426, HAL.
    3. Eduardo Duque‐Grisales & Javier Aguilera‐Caracuel & Jaime Guerrero‐Villegas & Encarnación García‐Sánchez, 2020. "Does green innovation affect the financial performance of Multilatinas? The moderating role of ISO 14001 and R&D investment," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3286-3302, December.
    4. Flladina Zilja & Gilbert Kofi Adarkwah & Christopher Albert Sabel, 2022. "Do Environmental Policies Affect MNEs’ Foreign Subsidiary Investments? An Empirical Investigation," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 62(1), pages 53-102, February.
    5. Zhangsheng Liu & Liuqingqing Yang & Liqin Fan, 2021. "Induced Effect of Environmental Regulation on Green Innovation: Evidence from the Increasing-Block Pricing Scheme," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Mario Vaupel & David Bendig & Denise Fischer-Kreer & Malte Brettel, 2023. "The Role of Share Repurchases for Firms’ Social and Environmental Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(2), pages 401-428, March.
    7. Blackman, Allen & Guerrero, Santiago, 2012. "What drives voluntary eco-certification in Mexico?," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 256-268.
    8. Magali Delmas & Ivan Montiel, 2009. "Greening the Supply Chain: When Is Customer Pressure Effective?," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 171-201, March.
    9. Maria Lam, 2009. "Beyond Credibility of Doing Business in China: Strategies for Improving Corporate Citizenship of Foreign Multinational Enterprises in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 137-146, April.
    10. Durán-Romero, Gemma & López, Ana M. & Beliaeva, Tatiana & Ferasso, Marcos & Garonne, Christophe & Jones, Paul, 2020. "Bridging the gap between circular economy and climate change mitigation policies through eco-innovations and Quintuple Helix Model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    11. Magadán-Díaz, Marta & Sotiriadis, Marios & Rivas-García, Jesús, 2019. "Drivers of eco-innovation in the Spanish hospitality industry," MPRA Paper 94090, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Isabel-María García-Sánchez & Cristina Aibar-Guzmán & Carmen Serrano-Valdecillos & Beatriz Aibar-Guzmán, 2022. "Analysis of the Dialogue with Stakeholders by the IBEX 35 Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, February.
    13. Lin Cui & Fuming Jiang, 2010. "Behind ownership decision of Chinese outward FDI: Resources and institutions," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 751-774, December.
    14. Yu Wang & Yetaotao Qiu & Yi Luo, 2022. "CEO foreign experience and corporate sustainable development: Evidence from China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2036-2051, July.
    15. Myoungjin Oh & Jungwoo Shin & Pil‐Ju Park & Sunmee Kim, 2020. "Does eco‐innovation drive sales and technology investment? Focusing on eco‐label in Korea," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3174-3186, December.
    16. Kalinic, Igor & Brouthers, Keith D., 2022. "Entrepreneurial orientation, export channel selection, and export performance of SMEs," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(1).
    17. Pei Sun & Jonathan P. Doh & Tazeeb Rajwani & Donald Siegel, 2021. "Navigating cross-border institutional complexity: A review and assessment of multinational nonmarket strategy research," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(9), pages 1818-1853, December.
    18. Graafland, J.J. & Kaptein, M. & Mazereeuw V/d Duijn Schouten, C., 2010. "Motives of Socially Responsible Business Conduct," Other publications TiSEM 3053983b-5552-408c-86a4-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    19. Heejung Byun & Tae-Hyun Kim, 2017. "Identity Claims and Diffusion of Sustainability Report: Evidence from Korean Listed Companies, 2003–2010," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(3), pages 551-565, February.
    20. Cosmina L. Voinea & Bas-Jan Hoogenberg & Cosmin Fratostiteanu & Hammad Bin Azam Hashmi, 2020. "The Relation between Environmental Management Systems and Environmental and Financial Performance in Emerging Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-21, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental management accounting; environmental performance; SMEs; Indonesia.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q55 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Technological Innovation
    • Q50 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2019-06-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.