IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v79y2023i4p3701-3714.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study design for restricted mean time analysis of recurrent events and death

Author

Listed:
  • Lu Mao

Abstract

The restricted mean time in favor (RMT‐IF) of treatment has just been added to the analytic toolbox for composite endpoints of recurrent events and death. To help practitioners design new trials based on this method, we develop tools to calculate the sample size and power. Specifically, we formulate the outcomes as a multistate Markov process with a sequence of transient states for recurrent events and an absorbing state for death. The transition intensities, in this case the instantaneous risks of another nonfatal event or death, are assumed to be time‐homogeneous but nonetheless allowed to depend on the number of past events. Using the properties of Coxian distributions, we derive the RMT‐IF effect size under the alternative hypothesis as a function of the treatment‐to‐control intensity ratios along with the baseline intensities, the latter of which can be easily estimated from historical data. We also reduce the variance of the nonparametric RMT‐IF estimator to calculable terms under a standard set‐up for censoring. Simulation studies show that the resulting formulas provide accurate approximation to the sample size and power in realistic settings. For illustration, a past cardiovascular trial with recurrent‐hospitalization and mortality outcomes is analyzed to generate the parameters needed to design a future trial. The procedures are incorporated into the rmt package along with the original methodology on the Comprehensive R Archive Network (CRAN).

Suggested Citation

  • Lu Mao, 2023. "Study design for restricted mean time analysis of recurrent events and death," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3701-3714, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:79:y:2023:i:4:p:3701-3714
    DOI: 10.1111/biom.13923
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/biom.13923
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/biom.13923?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Godwin Yung & Yi Liu, 2020. "Sample size and power for the weighted log‐rank test and Kaplan‐Meier based tests with allowance for nonproportional hazards," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(3), pages 939-950, September.
    2. Lu Tian & Haoda Fu & Stephen J. Ruberg & Hajime Uno & Lee†Jen Wei, 2018. "Efficiency of two sample tests via the restricted mean survival time for analyzing event time observations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(2), pages 694-702, June.
    3. Donglin Zeng & D. Y. Lin, 2009. "Semiparametric Transformation Models with Random Effects for Joint Analysis of Recurrent and Terminal Events," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(3), pages 746-752, September.
    4. Jianghao Li & Sin-Ho Jung, 2022. "Sample size calculation for clustered survival data under subunit randomization," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 40-67, January.
    5. Lu Tian & Hua Jin & Hajime Uno & Ying Lu & Bo Huang & Keaven M. Anderson & LJ Wei, 2020. "On the empirical choice of the time window for restricted mean survival time," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 1157-1166, December.
    6. Soo Yeon Kim, 2021. "Investment commitments in PTAs and MNCS in partner countries," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 415-442, November.
    7. Tango, Toshiro, 2009. "Sample size formula for randomized controlled trials with counts of recurrent events," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(4), pages 466-472, February.
    8. Torben Martinussen & Stijn Vansteelandt & Per Kragh Andersen, 2020. "Subtleties in the interpretation of hazard contrasts," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 833-855, October.
    9. Lu Mao, 2023. "On restricted mean time in favor of treatment," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 61-72, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rachel Axelrod & Daniel Nevo, 2023. "A sensitivity analysis approach for the causal hazard ratio in randomized and observational studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 2743-2756, September.
    2. Xiaowei Sun & Jieli Ding & Liuquan Sun, 2020. "A semiparametric additive rates model for the weighted composite endpoint of recurrent and terminal events," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 471-492, July.
    3. Paul Frédéric Blanche & Anders Holt & Thomas Scheike, 2023. "On logistic regression with right censored data, with or without competing risks, and its use for estimating treatment effects," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 441-482, April.
    4. Benjamin R. Baer & Robert L. Strawderman & Ashkan Ertefaie, 2023. "Discussion on “Instrumental variable estimation of the causal hazard ratio,” by Linbo Wang, Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen, Torben Martinussen, and Stijn Vansteelandt," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 554-558, June.
    5. Xiaoyu Wang & Liuquan Sun, 2023. "Joint modeling of generalized scale-change models for recurrent event and failure time data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 1-33, January.
    6. Fei Jiang & Sebastien Haneuse, 2017. "A Semi-parametric Transformation Frailty Model for Semi-competing Risks Survival Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 44(1), pages 112-129, March.
    7. Miao Han & Liuquan Sun & Yutao Liu & Jun Zhu, 2018. "Joint analysis of recurrent event data with additive–multiplicative hazards model for the terminal event time," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 81(5), pages 523-547, July.
    8. Lu Tian & Hua Jin & Hajime Uno & Ying Lu & Bo Huang & Keaven M. Anderson & LJ Wei, 2020. "On the empirical choice of the time window for restricted mean survival time," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 1157-1166, December.
    9. Dongxiao Han & Xiaogang Su & Liuquan Sun & Zhou Zhang & Lei Liu, 2020. "Variable selection in joint frailty models of recurrent and terminal events," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 76(4), pages 1330-1339, December.
    10. Ross L. Prentice, 2022. "On the targets of inference with multivariate failure time data," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 546-559, October.
    11. Yingchao Zhong & Douglas E. Schaubel, 2022. "Restricted mean survival time as a function of restriction time," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 192-201, March.
    12. Xiaodong Luo & Hong Tian & Surya Mohanty & Wei Yann Tsai, 2015. "An alternative approach to confidence interval estimation for the win ratio statistic," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(1), pages 139-145, March.
    13. Marc Buyse & Everardo D. Saad & Tomasz Burzykowski & Julien Péron, 2020. "Assessing Treatment Benefit in Immuno-oncology," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 12(2), pages 83-103, July.
    14. Yassin Mazroui & Audrey Mauguen & Simone Mathoulin-Pélissier & Gaetan MacGrogan & Véronique Brouste & Virginie Rondeau, 2016. "Time-varying coefficients in a multivariate frailty model: Application to breast cancer recurrences of several types and death," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 191-215, April.
    15. Mats J. Stensrud & Miguel A. Hernán & Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen & James M. Robins & Vanessa Didelez & Jessica G. Young, 2021. "A generalized theory of separable effects in competing event settings," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 588-631, October.
    16. Szilárd Nemes & Erik Bülow & Andreas Gustavsson, 2020. "A Brief Overview of Restricted Mean Survival Time Estimators and Associated Variances," Stats, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-13, May.
    17. Chengyuan Lu & Jelle Goeman & Hein Putter, 2023. "Maximum likelihood estimation in the additive hazards model," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(3), pages 1646-1656, September.
    18. Xifen Huang & Jinfeng Xu & Hao Guo & Jianhua Shi & Wenjie Zhao, 2022. "An MM Algorithm for the Frailty-Based Illness Death Model with Semi-Competing Risks Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-13, October.
    19. Chenyang Zhang & Guosheng Yin, 2023. "Bayesian nonparametric analysis of restricted mean survival time," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 1383-1396, June.
    20. Tat-Thang Vo & Hilary Davies-Kershaw & Ruth Hackett & Stijn Vansteelandt, 2022. "Longitudinal mediation analysis of time-to-event endpoints in the presence of competing risks," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 380-400, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:79:y:2023:i:4:p:3701-3714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.