IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v70y2014i1p1-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parametric likelihood inference for interval censored competing risks data

Author

Listed:
  • Michael G. Hudgens
  • Chenxi Li
  • Jason P. Fine

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael G. Hudgens & Chenxi Li & Jason P. Fine, 2014. "Parametric likelihood inference for interval censored competing risks data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(1), pages 1-9, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:70:y:2014:i:1:p:1-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/biom.12109
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicholas P. Jewell, 2003. "Nonparametric estimation from current status data with competing risks," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(1), pages 183-197, March.
    2. Anton Schick & Qiqing Yu, 2000. "Consistency of the GMLE with Mixed Case Interval‐Censored Data," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 27(1), pages 45-55, March.
    3. Michael G. Hudgens & Glen A. Satten & Ira M. Longini, 2001. "Nonparametric Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Competing Risks Survival Data Subject to Interval Censoring and Truncation," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(1), pages 74-80, March.
    4. Jong‐Hyeon Jeong & Jason Fine, 2006. "Direct parametric inference for the cumulative incidence function," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 55(2), pages 187-200, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lu Mao & Dan-Yu Lin & Donglin Zeng, 2017. "Semiparametric regression analysis of interval-censored competing risks data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(3), pages 857-865, September.
    2. Yosra Yousif & Faiz Elfaki & Meftah Hrairi & Oyelola Adegboye, 2022. "Bayesian Analysis of Masked Competing Risks Data Based on Proportional Subdistribution Hazards Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-10, August.
    3. Ryan Sun & Liang Zhu & Yimei Li & Yutaka Yasui & Leslie Robison, 2023. "Inference for set‐based effects in genetic association studies with interval‐censored outcomes," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(2), pages 1573-1585, June.
    4. Margarita Moreno-Betancur & Grégoire Rey & Aurélien Latouche, 2015. "Direct likelihood inference and sensitivity analysis for competing risks regression with missing causes of failure," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 71(2), pages 498-507, June.
    5. Li, Chenxi, 2016. "Cause-specific hazard regression for competing risks data under interval censoring and left truncation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 197-208.
    6. Li, Chenxi, 2016. "The Fine–Gray model under interval censored competing risks data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 327-344.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Chenxi, 2016. "The Fine–Gray model under interval censored competing risks data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 327-344.
    2. Li, Chenxi, 2016. "Cause-specific hazard regression for competing risks data under interval censoring and left truncation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 197-208.
    3. Michael G. Hudgens & Marloes H. Maathuis & Peter B. Gilbert, 2007. "Nonparametric Estimation of the Joint Distribution of a Survival Time Subject to Interval Censoring and a Continuous Mark Variable," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(2), pages 372-380, June.
    4. Somnath Datta & Rajeshwari Sundaram, 2006. "Nonparametric Estimation of Stage Occupation Probabilities in a Multistage Model with Current Status Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 829-837, September.
    5. Pao-sheng Shen, 2022. "Nonparametric estimation for competing risks survival data subject to left truncation and interval censoring," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 29-42, March.
    6. Lu Mao & Dan-Yu Lin & Donglin Zeng, 2017. "Semiparametric regression analysis of interval-censored competing risks data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(3), pages 857-865, September.
    7. Tamalika Koley & Anup Dewanji, 2019. "Revisiting Non-Parametric Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Current Status Data with Competing Risks," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 81(1), pages 39-59, June.
    8. Lu Mao & D. Y. Lin, 2017. "Efficient estimation of semiparametric transformation models for the cumulative incidence of competing risks," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 79(2), pages 573-587, March.
    9. Tamalika Koley & Anup Dewanji, 2024. "Use of Additional Information for Current Status Data with Two Competing Risks and Missing Failure Types," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 86(2), pages 477-505, November.
    10. Ma, Ling & Hu, Tao & Sun, Jianguo, 2016. "Cox regression analysis of dependent interval-censored failure time data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 79-90.
    11. Ling Lan & Dipankar Bandyopadhyay & Somnath Datta, 2017. "Non-parametric regression in clustered multistate current status data with informative cluster size," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 71(1), pages 31-57, January.
    12. Peijie Wang & Hui Zhao & Jianguo Sun, 2016. "Regression analysis of case K interval‐censored failure time data in the presence of informative censoring," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 1103-1112, December.
    13. Yu, Shaohua & Yu, Qiqing & Wong, George Y.C., 2006. "Consistency of the generalized MLE of a joint distribution function with multivariate interval-censored data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 720-732, March.
    14. Qiqing Yu & George Wong & Linxiong Li, 2001. "Asymptotic Properties of Self-Consistent Estimators with Mixed Interval-Censored Data," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 53(3), pages 469-486, September.
    15. Yosra Yousif & Faiz Elfaki & Meftah Hrairi & Oyelola Adegboye, 2022. "Bayesian Analysis of Masked Competing Risks Data Based on Proportional Subdistribution Hazards Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(17), pages 1-10, August.
    16. Judith J. Lok & Shu Yang & Brian Sharkey & Michael D. Hughes, 2018. "Estimation of the cumulative incidence function under multiple dependent and independent censoring mechanisms," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 201-223, April.
    17. Serge M. A. Somda & Eve Leconte & Andrew Kramar & Nicolas Penel & Christine Chevreau & Martine Delannes & Maria Rios & Thomas Filleron, 2014. "Determining the Length of Posttherapeutic Follow-up for Cancer Patients Using Competing Risks Modeling," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 34(2), pages 168-179, February.
    18. Halina Frydman & Michael Szarek, 2009. "Nonparametric Estimation in a Markov “Illness–Death” Process from Interval Censored Observations with Missing Intermediate Transition Status," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 65(1), pages 143-151, March.
    19. Sy Han Chiou & Gongjun Xu & Jun Yan & Chiung‐Yu Huang, 2018. "Semiparametric estimation of the accelerated mean model with panel count data under informative examination times," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 74(3), pages 944-953, September.
    20. Qiqing Yu & Yuting Hsu & Kai Yu, 2014. "A necessary and sufficient condition for justifying non-parametric likelihood with censored data," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 77(8), pages 995-1011, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:70:y:2014:i:1:p:1-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.