IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/biomet/v90y2003i1p183-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nonparametric estimation from current status data with competing risks

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas P. Jewell

Abstract

A great deal of recent attention has focused on the estimation of survival distributions based on current status data, an extreme form of interval censored data. This particular data structure arises in a wide variety of applications where cross-sectional observation either naturally occurs or is preferred to more traditional forms of follow-up. Here we consider current status data in the context of competing risks. We briefly consider simple parametric models as a backdrop to nonparametric procedures. We make some brief comparisons and remarks regarding the nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator. The ideas are illustrated on the data of Krailo & Pike (1983) which considers estimation of the age distribution at both natural and operative menopause. We also consider the case where there is exact observation of failure times due to one of the competing risks when failure occurs prior to the monitoring time. Copyright Biometrika Trust 2003, Oxford University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas P. Jewell, 2003. "Nonparametric estimation from current status data with competing risks," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(1), pages 183-197, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:90:y:2003:i:1:p:183-197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lu Mao & Dan-Yu Lin & Donglin Zeng, 2017. "Semiparametric regression analysis of interval-censored competing risks data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(3), pages 857-865, September.
    2. Tamalika Koley & Anup Dewanji, 2019. "Revisiting Non-Parametric Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Current Status Data with Competing Risks," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 81(1), pages 39-59, June.
    3. Ling Lan & Dipankar Bandyopadhyay & Somnath Datta, 2017. "Non-parametric regression in clustered multistate current status data with informative cluster size," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 71(1), pages 31-57, January.
    4. Li, Chenxi, 2016. "The Fine–Gray model under interval censored competing risks data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 327-344.
    5. Lim, Johan & Wang, Xinlei & Choi, Wanseok, 2009. "Maximum likelihood estimation of ordered multinomial probabilities by geometric programming," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 889-893, February.
    6. Tamalika Koley & Anup Dewanji, 2024. "Use of Additional Information for Current Status Data with Two Competing Risks and Missing Failure Types," Sankhya B: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Springer;Indian Statistical Institute, vol. 86(2), pages 477-505, November.
    7. Michael G. Hudgens & Chenxi Li & Jason P. Fine, 2014. "Parametric likelihood inference for interval censored competing risks data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 70(1), pages 1-9, March.
    8. Somnath Datta & Rajeshwari Sundaram, 2006. "Nonparametric Estimation of Stage Occupation Probabilities in a Multistage Model with Current Status Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(3), pages 829-837, September.
    9. Li, Chenxi, 2016. "Cause-specific hazard regression for competing risks data under interval censoring and left truncation," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 197-208.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:biomet:v:90:y:2003:i:1:p:183-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/biomet .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.