IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/biomet/v66y2010i1p169-177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Double-Observer Line Transect Methods: Levels of Independence

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen T. Buckland
  • Jeffrey L. Laake
  • David L. Borchers

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen T. Buckland & Jeffrey L. Laake & David L. Borchers, 2010. "Double-Observer Line Transect Methods: Levels of Independence," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 169-177, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:66:y:2010:i:1:p:169-177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01239.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hans J. Skaug & Tore Schweder, 1999. "Hazard Models for Line Transect Surveys with Independent Observers," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(1), pages 29-36, March.
    2. Tore Schweder & Hans J. Skaug & Mette Langaas & Xeni K. Dimakos, 1999. "Simulated Likelihood Methods for Complex Double-Platform Line Transect Surveys," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(3), pages 678-687, September.
    3. Song Xi Chen, 1999. "Estimation in Independent Observer Line Transect Surveys for Clustered Populations," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(3), pages 754-759, September.
    4. D. L. Borchers & J. L. Laake & C. Southwell & C. G. M. Paxton, 2006. "Accommodating Unmodeled Heterogeneity in Double-Observer Distance Sampling Surveys," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(2), pages 372-378, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. D. I. MacKenzie & D. Clement, 2016. "Accounting for Lack of Independence and Partial Overlap of Observation Zones in Line-Transect Mark-Recapture Distance Sampling," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 21(1), pages 41-57, March.
    2. Paul B Conn & Jeffrey L Laake & Devin S Johnson, 2012. "A Hierarchical Modeling Framework for Multiple Observer Transect Surveys," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Hiroshi Okamura & Shingo Minamikawa & Hans J. Skaug & Toshiya Kishiro, 2012. "Abundance Estimation of Long-Diving Animals Using Line Transect Methods," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 504-513, June.
    4. Justin J. Van Ee & Christian A. Hagen & David C. Pavlacky Jr. & Kent A. Fricke & Matthew D. Koslovsky & Mevin B. Hooten, 2023. "Melding wildlife surveys to improve conservation inference," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3941-3953, December.
    5. S. T. Buckland & C. S. Oedekoven & D. L. Borchers, 2016. "Model-Based Distance Sampling," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 21(1), pages 58-75, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hiroshi Okamura & Shingo Minamikawa & Hans J. Skaug & Toshiya Kishiro, 2012. "Abundance Estimation of Long-Diving Animals Using Line Transect Methods," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 504-513, June.
    2. David Louis Borchers & Martin James Cox, 2017. "Distance sampling detection functions: 2D or not 2D?," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 73(2), pages 593-602, June.
    3. Hiroshi Okamura & Toshihide Kitakado & Kazuhiko Hiramatsu & Mitsuyo Mori, 2003. "Abundance Estimation of Diving Animals by the Double-Platform Line Transect Method," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 512-520, September.
    4. S. T. Buckland & C. S. Oedekoven & D. L. Borchers, 2016. "Model-Based Distance Sampling," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 21(1), pages 58-75, March.
    5. S. T. Buckland & D. L. Borchers & A. Johnston & P. A. Henrys & T. A. Marques, 2007. "Line Transect Methods for Plant Surveys," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 989-998, December.
    6. Tore Schweder & Hans J. Skaug & Mette Langaas & Xeni K. Dimakos, 1999. "Simulated Likelihood Methods for Complex Double-Platform Line Transect Surveys," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 55(3), pages 678-687, September.
    7. Devin S. Johnson & Jeffrey L. Laake & Jay M. Ver Hoef, 2010. "A Model-Based Approach for Making Ecological Inference from Distance Sampling Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 310-318, March.
    8. Paul B Conn & Jeffrey L Laake & Devin S Johnson, 2012. "A Hierarchical Modeling Framework for Multiple Observer Transect Surveys," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-13, August.
    9. Justin J. Van Ee & Christian A. Hagen & David C. Pavlacky Jr. & Kent A. Fricke & Matthew D. Koslovsky & Mevin B. Hooten, 2023. "Melding wildlife surveys to improve conservation inference," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3941-3953, December.
    10. Magne Aldrin & Marit Holden & Tore Schweder, 2003. "Comment on Cowling's “Spatial Methods for Line Transect Surveys”," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(1), pages 186-188, March.
    11. D. L. Borchers & W. Zucchini & M. P. Heide‐Jørgensen & A. Cañadas & R. Langrock, 2013. "Using Hidden Markov Models to Deal with Availability Bias on Line Transect Surveys," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 69(3), pages 703-713, September.
    12. Mark V. Bravington & David L. Miller & Sharon L. Hedley, 2021. "Variance Propagation for Density Surface Models," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(2), pages 306-323, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:biomet:v:66:y:2010:i:1:p:169-177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0006-341X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.