IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0042294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Hierarchical Modeling Framework for Multiple Observer Transect Surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Paul B Conn
  • Jeffrey L Laake
  • Devin S Johnson

Abstract

Ecologists often use multiple observer transect surveys to census animal populations. In addition to animal counts, these surveys produce sequences of detections and non-detections for each observer. When combined with additional data (i.e. covariates such as distance from the transect line), these sequences provide the additional information to estimate absolute abundance when detectability on the transect line is less than one. Although existing analysis approaches for such data have proven extremely useful, they have some limitations. For instance, it is difficult to extrapolate from observed areas to unobserved areas unless a rigorous sampling design is adhered to; it is also difficult to share information across spatial and temporal domains or to accommodate habitat-abundance relationships. In this paper, we introduce a hierarchical modeling framework for multiple observer line transects that removes these limitations. In particular, abundance intensities can be modeled as a function of habitat covariates, making it easier to extrapolate to unsampled areas. Our approach relies on a complete data representation of the state space, where unobserved animals and their covariates are modeled using a reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm. Observer detections are modeled via a bivariate normal distribution on the probit scale, with dependence induced by a distance-dependent correlation parameter. We illustrate performance of our approach with simulated data and on a known population of golf tees. In both cases, we show that our hierarchical modeling approach yields accurate inference about abundance and related parameters. In addition, we obtain accurate inference about population-level covariates (e.g. group size). We recommend that ecologists consider using hierarchical models when analyzing multiple-observer transect data, especially when it is difficult to rigorously follow pre-specified sampling designs. We provide a new R package, hierarchicalDS, to facilitate the building and fitting of these models.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul B Conn & Jeffrey L Laake & Devin S Johnson, 2012. "A Hierarchical Modeling Framework for Multiple Observer Transect Surveys," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(8), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0042294
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0042294
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0042294&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0042294?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. D. L. Borchers & J. L. Laake & C. Southwell & C. G. M. Paxton, 2006. "Accommodating Unmodeled Heterogeneity in Double-Observer Distance Sampling Surveys," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 62(2), pages 372-378, June.
    2. Stephen T. Buckland & Jeffrey L. Laake & David L. Borchers, 2010. "Double-Observer Line Transect Methods: Levels of Independence," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 169-177, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pavanato, Heloise J. & Wedekin, Leonardo L. & Guilherme-Silveira, Fernando R. & Engel, Márcia H. & Kinas, Paul G., 2017. "Estimating humpback whale abundance using hierarchical distance sampling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 358(C), pages 10-18.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. S. T. Buckland & C. S. Oedekoven & D. L. Borchers, 2016. "Model-Based Distance Sampling," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 21(1), pages 58-75, March.
    2. Justin J. Van Ee & Christian A. Hagen & David C. Pavlacky Jr. & Kent A. Fricke & Matthew D. Koslovsky & Mevin B. Hooten, 2023. "Melding wildlife surveys to improve conservation inference," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 79(4), pages 3941-3953, December.
    3. Hiroshi Okamura & Shingo Minamikawa & Hans J. Skaug & Toshiya Kishiro, 2012. "Abundance Estimation of Long-Diving Animals Using Line Transect Methods," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 68(2), pages 504-513, June.
    4. S. T. Buckland & D. L. Borchers & A. Johnston & P. A. Henrys & T. A. Marques, 2007. "Line Transect Methods for Plant Surveys," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 63(4), pages 989-998, December.
    5. Devin S. Johnson & Jeffrey L. Laake & Jay M. Ver Hoef, 2010. "A Model-Based Approach for Making Ecological Inference from Distance Sampling Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 310-318, March.
    6. Stephen T. Buckland & Jeffrey L. Laake & David L. Borchers, 2010. "Double-Observer Line Transect Methods: Levels of Independence," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 66(1), pages 169-177, March.
    7. D. I. MacKenzie & D. Clement, 2016. "Accounting for Lack of Independence and Partial Overlap of Observation Zones in Line-Transect Mark-Recapture Distance Sampling," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 21(1), pages 41-57, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0042294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.