IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/asiaps/v10y2023i1-3p63-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A policy and research agenda for Asia's poultry industry

Author

Listed:
  • Sango Mahanty
  • Assa Doron
  • Rebecca Hamilton

Abstract

Meat consumption and production in Asia have boomed over the last decade to meet growing regional and global demand. Asia now supplies around 40% of the global broiler or meat chicken industry. Dominant policy frameworks such as ‘One Health’ aim to manage the health risks associated with factory livestock farming, which has rightly become a major concern because of regular disease outbreaks. Yet this approach provides a limited basis for addressing broader risks and challenges associated with what we term the Asian ‘broiler complex’. This includes the intertwined networks of feed production, factory farming and meat distribution nodes through which health and environmental risks can accumulate and be amplified. By applying this broader lens, we highlight the need to better understand the industry's pressing environmental, animal welfare, social and health challenges to inform more integrated policy approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Sango Mahanty & Assa Doron & Rebecca Hamilton, 2023. "A policy and research agenda for Asia's poultry industry," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1-3), pages 63-72, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:asiaps:v:10:y:2023:i:1-3:p:63-72
    DOI: 10.1002/app5.377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.377
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/app5.377?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guiyan Ao & Qiang Liu & Li Qin & Minghao Chen & Shuai Liu & Weiguang Wu, 2021. "Organization model, vertical integration, and farmers’ income growth: Empirical evidence from large-scale farmers in Lin’an, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(6), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Kathryn Gillespie, 2022. "An Unthinkable Politics for Multispecies Flourishing within and beyond Colonial-Capitalist Ruins," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(4), pages 1108-1122, April.
    3. Weis, Tony, 2013. "The Ecological Hoofprint," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9781780320977, Febrero.
    4. Broom, Alex & Doron, Assa, 2022. "Resistant bugs, porous borders and ecologies of care in India," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    5. Margaret Kyakuwaire & Giregon Olupot & Alice Amoding & Peter Nkedi-Kizza & Twaha Ateenyi Basamba, 2019. "How Safe is Chicken Litter for Land Application as an Organic Fertilizer?: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-23, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daabo, Ahmed M. & Saeed, Liqaa I. & Altamer, Marwa H. & Fadhil, Abdelrahman B. & Badawy, Tawfik, 2022. "The production of bio-based fuels and carbon catalysts from chicken waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 21-34.
    2. Anna-Mara Schön & Marita Böhringer, 2023. "Land Consumption for Current Diets Compared with That for the Planetary Health Diet—How Many People Can Our Land Feed?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-35, May.
    3. Paula Rogovski & Raphael da Silva & Rafael Dorighello Cadamuro & Estêvão Brasiliense de Souza & Beatriz Pereira Savi & Aline Viancelli & William Michelon & Deisi Cristina Tápparo & Helen Treichel & Da, 2021. "Salmonella enterica Serovar Enteritidis Control in Poultry Litter Mediated by Lytic Bacteriophage Isolated from Swine Manure," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-9, August.
    4. Muthu Manikandan & Sechul Chun & Zakayo Kazibwe & Judy Gopal & Udai Bhan Singh & Jae-Wook Oh, 2020. "Phenomenal Bombardment of Antibiotic in Poultry: Contemplating the Environmental Repercussions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-15, July.
    5. Donna Hornby & Adrian Nel & Samuel Chademana & Nompilo Khanyile, 2018. "A Slipping Hold? Farm Dweller Precarity in South Africa’s Changing Agrarian Economy and Climate," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-25, March.
    6. Dominik Noll & Christian Lauk & Veronika Gaube & Dominik Wiedenhofer, 2020. "Caught in a Deadlock: Small Ruminant Farming on the Greek Island of Samothrace. The Importance of Regional Contexts for Effective EU Agricultural Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, January.
    7. von Gall, Philipp & Luy, Jörg & Köder, Moritz & von Meyer-Höfer, Marie, 2022. "How – and How Much? An Analysis of Options for a Transformation of German Animal Farming towards Sustainability," 62nd Annual Conference, Stuttgart, Germany, September 7-9, 2022 329602, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    8. Jill K. Clark & Kristen Lowitt & Charles Z. Levkoe & Peter Andrée, 2021. "The power to convene: making sense of the power of food movement organizations in governance processes in the Global North," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(1), pages 175-191, February.
    9. Krausmann, Fridolin & Langthaler, Ernst, 2019. "Food regimes and their trade links: A socio-ecological perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 87-95.
    10. Kathryn Gillespie, 2021. "The afterlives of the lively commodity: Life-worlds, death-worlds, rotting-worlds," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(2), pages 280-295, March.
    11. Eleanor Andrews, 2019. "To save the bees or not to save the bees: honey bee health in the Anthropocene," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(4), pages 891-902, December.
    12. Howard, Philip H. & Ajena, Francesco & Yamaoka, Marina & Clarke, Amber, 2021. "'Protein' Industry Convergence and its Implications for Resilient and Equitable Food Systems," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 5.
    13. M. Kanerva, 2022. "Consumption Corridors and the Case of Meat," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 619-653, December.
    14. Caffyn, Alison, 2021. "Broiler battles: Contested intensive poultry unit developments in a policy void," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    15. Bertrand Valiorgue & Emilie Bourlier-Bargues & Kevin Metz, 2020. "Varieties and externalities of biosocial organizations in the Anthropocene, a boundary-work perspective," Post-Print hal-03041014, HAL.
    16. Anthony Winson & Jin Young Choi, 2017. "Dietary regimes and the nutrition transition: bridging disciplinary domains," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(3), pages 559-572, September.
    17. Aguiar, Raphael & Keil, Roger & Wiktorowicz, Mary, 2024. "The urban political ecology of antimicrobial resistance: A critical lens on integrative governance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 348(C).
    18. T. L. Pendergrast & Bobby J. Smith & Jeffrey A. Liebert & Rachel Bezner Kerr, 2019. "Introduction to the symposium: rethinking food system transformation—food sovereignty, agroecology, food justice, community action and scholarship," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(4), pages 819-823, December.
    19. Szoke, Helen, 2014. "Watch your waste: Lose less, consume sustainably, feed more," 2014: Ethics, Efficiency and Food Security: Feeding the 9 Billion, Well, 26-28 August 2014 225579, Crawford Fund.
    20. Carol Morris & Minna Kaljonen & Kadri Aavik & Bálint Balázs & Matthew Cole & Ben Coles & Sophia Efstathiou & Tracey Fallon & Mike Foden & Eva Haifa Giraud & Mike Goodman & Eleanor Hadley Kershaw & Ric, 2021. "Priorities for social science and humanities research on the challenges of moving beyond animal-based food systems," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-12, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:asiaps:v:10:y:2023:i:1-3:p:63-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=2050-2680 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.