IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/agrhuv/v36y2019i4d10.1007_s10460-019-09946-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To save the bees or not to save the bees: honey bee health in the Anthropocene

Author

Listed:
  • Eleanor Andrews

    (Cornell University)

Abstract

As honey bee colonies continue to perish at high rates, beekeepers are divided on how best to keep bees healthy and productive. In this article, I describe the tensions between conventional beekeepers and a new wave of beekeepers hoping to “save the bees” through a more “natural” approach to beekeeping. Drawing on animal studies and multispecies literature, I show how beekeepers in both camps are constrained by the reality of the Anthropocene: novel ecologies, shifting baselines, and the hybridity of honey bees themselves—part wild animal subject to environmental change, part industrial organism, embedded in circuits of migratory pollination. Beekeepers on both sides are investing in genetics as a solution to honey bee health problems. Thinking with bees helps deepen the literature on multispecies encounters and interrogate the idea of sustainability in agriculture, while thinking with the Anthropocene prompts us to ask what “saving the bees” even means in today’s changing world.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleanor Andrews, 2019. "To save the bees or not to save the bees: honey bee health in the Anthropocene," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(4), pages 891-902, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:36:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10460-019-09946-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s10460-019-09946-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10460-019-09946-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10460-019-09946-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weis, Tony, 2013. "The Ecological Hoofprint," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, number 9781780320977, Febrero.
    2. Rosemary-Claire Collard & Jessica Dempsey & Juanita Sundberg, 2015. "A Manifesto for Abundant Futures," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 105(2), pages 322-330, March.
    3. Holly Jean Buck, 2015. "On the Possibilities of a Charming Anthropocene," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 105(2), pages 369-377, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maderson, Siobhan, 2023. "Co-producing agricultural policy with beekeepers: Obstacles and opportunities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    2. Rebecca Ellis, 2022. "Social reproduction, playful work, and bee-centred beekeeping," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1329-1340, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna-Mara Schön & Marita Böhringer, 2023. "Land Consumption for Current Diets Compared with That for the Planetary Health Diet—How Many People Can Our Land Feed?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-35, May.
    2. Kirstie O’Neill & Charlotte Sinden, 2021. "Universities, Sustainability, and Neoliberalism: Contradictions of the Climate Emergency Declarations," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 29-40.
    3. Donna Hornby & Adrian Nel & Samuel Chademana & Nompilo Khanyile, 2018. "A Slipping Hold? Farm Dweller Precarity in South Africa’s Changing Agrarian Economy and Climate," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-25, March.
    4. Singh, Neera M., 2019. "Environmental justice, degrowth and post-capitalist futures," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 138-142.
    5. Johan Nordensvärd & Markus Ketola & Frauke Urban, 2022. "The River Runs Through It: Naturalising Social Policy and Welfare," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Stålhammar, Sanna, 2021. "Polarised views of urban biodiversity and the role of socio-cultural valuation: Lessons from Cape Town," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    7. Dominik Noll & Christian Lauk & Veronika Gaube & Dominik Wiedenhofer, 2020. "Caught in a Deadlock: Small Ruminant Farming on the Greek Island of Samothrace. The Importance of Regional Contexts for Effective EU Agricultural Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Krithika Srinivasan, 2017. "Conservation biopolitics and the sustainability episteme," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(7), pages 1458-1476, July.
    9. von Gall, Philipp & Luy, Jörg & Köder, Moritz & von Meyer-Höfer, Marie, 2022. "How – and How Much? An Analysis of Options for a Transformation of German Animal Farming towards Sustainability," 62nd Annual Conference, Stuttgart, Germany, September 7-9, 2022 329602, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    10. Jill K. Clark & Kristen Lowitt & Charles Z. Levkoe & Peter Andrée, 2021. "The power to convene: making sense of the power of food movement organizations in governance processes in the Global North," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(1), pages 175-191, February.
    11. Krausmann, Fridolin & Langthaler, Ernst, 2019. "Food regimes and their trade links: A socio-ecological perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 87-95.
    12. Lucie Sovová & Petr Jehlička & Petr Daněk, 2021. "Growing the Beautiful Anthropocene: Ethics of Care in East European Food Gardens," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, May.
    13. Kathryn Gillespie, 2021. "The afterlives of the lively commodity: Life-worlds, death-worlds, rotting-worlds," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 53(2), pages 280-295, March.
    14. Sango Mahanty & Assa Doron & Rebecca Hamilton, 2023. "A policy and research agenda for Asia's poultry industry," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1-3), pages 63-72, January.
    15. Alida Cantor & Sarah Knuth, 2019. "Speculations on the postnatural: Restoration, accumulation, and sacrifice at the Salton Sea," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(2), pages 527-544, March.
    16. Howard, Philip H. & Ajena, Francesco & Yamaoka, Marina & Clarke, Amber, 2021. "'Protein' Industry Convergence and its Implications for Resilient and Equitable Food Systems," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 5.
    17. M. Kanerva, 2022. "Consumption Corridors and the Case of Meat," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 619-653, December.
    18. Caffyn, Alison, 2021. "Broiler battles: Contested intensive poultry unit developments in a policy void," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    19. Bertrand Valiorgue & Emilie Bourlier-Bargues & Kevin Metz, 2020. "Varieties and externalities of biosocial organizations in the Anthropocene, a boundary-work perspective," Post-Print hal-03041014, HAL.
    20. Anthony Winson & Jin Young Choi, 2017. "Dietary regimes and the nutrition transition: bridging disciplinary domains," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(3), pages 559-572, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:agrhuv:v:36:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10460-019-09946-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.