IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/annpce/v85y2014i3p371-386.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does The Effectiveness Of Board Of Directors Affect Firm Performance Of Consumer Co-Operatives? The Case Of Icoop Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Eunju CHOI
  • Woosuk CHOI
  • Seungkwon JANG
  • Sangsun PARK

Abstract

type="main" xml:lang="fr"> Les coopératives de consommation se sont fortement développées en Corée depuis qu'elles ont ouvert leurs propres magasins. Les coopératives trop orientées vers le développement ou la croissance économique pourraient aisément ne plus être attentives à la participation des membres, ce qui est une des priorités des coopératives. Cela pourrait conduire à une perte de la valeur coopérative. Il est dès lors important d'ajuster l’équilibre entre participation des membres et croissance économique. Cet article se centre sur le rôle des Conseils de direction pour ce faire. Il vise à examiner comment l'efficience de dirigeants influence la participation des membres et comment cette participation a un impact sur la performance des coopératives dans le cas de iCOOP Corée. Des variables telles que la communication avec les membres et l'utilisation de connaissances et de techniques de gestion mesurent l'efficience des dirigeants dans le processus de prise de décision. Les données provenant d‘enquêtes auprès de 222 directeurs de 30 coopératives de premier degré sont analysées à l'aide d'un Modèle d'Equation Structurelle. Les résultats de la recherche sont les suivants. En premier lieu, la communication de la direction avec les membres accroît la participation démocratique de ceux-ci, et la participation accrue contribue à améliorer la performance financière. En second lieu, les techniques et les connaissances de gestion des dirigeants n'ont pas de relations significatives avec le niveau de participation des membres. Cependant la participation économique des membres a une relation positive significative avec la performance financière. Les résultats révèlent que la participation volontaire des membres augmente quand les Conseils de direction tentent d’être fidèles aux besoins des membres dans les processus de décision et cela peut aider les coopératives à être plus performantes financièrement. Il s'agit sans doute d'une piste pour l‘équilibre entre valeurs coopératives et croissance de l'entreprise que de nombreuses coopératives tentent de réaliser.

Suggested Citation

  • Eunju CHOI & Woosuk CHOI & Seungkwon JANG & Sangsun PARK, 2014. "Does The Effectiveness Of Board Of Directors Affect Firm Performance Of Consumer Co-Operatives? The Case Of Icoop Korea," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 85(3), pages 371-386, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:85:y:2014:i:3:p:371-386
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/apce.12046
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Valérie Barraud-Didier & Marie-Christine Henninger & Asâad El Akremi, 2012. "The Relationship Between Members' Trust and Participation in Governance of Cooperatives : The Role of Organizational Commitment," Post-Print halshs-00695926, HAL.
    2. Fama, Eugene F & Jensen, Michael C, 1983. "Separation of Ownership and Control," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(2), pages 301-325, June.
    3. Johnston Birchall & Richard Simmons, 2004. "What Motivates Members to Participate in Co‐operative and Mutual Businesses?," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(3), pages 465-495, September.
    4. Barraud-Didier, Valérie & Henninger, Marie-Christine & El Akremi, Assâad, 2012. "The Relationship Between Members’ Trust and Participation in the Governance of Cooperatives: The Role of Organizational Commitment," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, February.
    5. Jensen, Michael C. & Meckling, William H., 1976. "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 305-360, October.
    6. Lee D. Parker, 2007. "Boardroom Strategizing in Professional Associations: Processual and Institutional Perspectives," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(8), pages 1454-1480, December.
    7. Yermack, David, 1996. "Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 185-211, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Constantine Iliopoulos & Rando Värnik & Taavi Kiisk & George Varthalamis & Liis Sinnott, 2022. "Governance in Estonian Agricultural Cooperatives: Structures and Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, November.
    2. Jinseon Seo & Woosuk Choi, 2021. "Classification of co‐operative member shares as equity or liabilities: The case of consumer co‐operatives in South Korea," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(2), pages 283-305, June.
    3. Eric Bidet & Hyungsik Eum, 2022. "Une analyse socio‐économique de la trajectoire institutionnelle de l'entreprise sociale : le cas de la Corée du Sud," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(1), pages 229-247, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Ming-Yuan, 2014. "Determinants of corporate board structure in Taiwan," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 62-78.
    2. Chrysoula Morfi & Jerker Nilsson & Karin Hakelius & Kostas Karantininis, 2021. "Social networks and member participation in cooperative governance," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(2), pages 264-285, April.
    3. David Hillier & Patrick McColgan, 2008. "An analysis of majority owner‐managed companies in the UK," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(4), pages 603-623, December.
    4. Martin Kyere & Marcel Ausloos, 2021. "Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United Kingdom," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 1871-1885, April.
    5. Brogi, Marina & Lagasio, Valentina, 2022. "Better safe than sorry. Bank corporate governance, risk-taking, and performance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    6. Tleubayev, Alisher & Bobojonov, Ihtiyor & Gagalyuk, Taras & Glauben, Thomas, 2020. "Board gender diversity and firm performance: Evidence from the Russian agri-food industry," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 23(1), pages 35-53.
    7. Marco Allegrini & Giulio Greco, 2013. "Corporate boards, audit committees and voluntary disclosure: evidence from Italian Listed Companies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(1), pages 187-216, February.
    8. Rimon Emile & Aiman Ragab & Sandy Kyaw, 2014. "The Effect of Corporate Governance on Firm Performance, Evidence from Egypt," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 4(12), pages 1865-1877, December.
    9. Ali Uyar & Cemil Kuzey & Merve Kilic & Abdullah S. Karaman, 2021. "Board structure, financial performance, corporate social responsibility performance, CSR committee, and CEO duality: Disentangling the connection in healthcare," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1730-1748, November.
    10. Panagiotis Staikouras & Christos Staikouras & Maria-Eleni Agoraki, 2007. "The effect of board size and composition on European bank performance," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 1-27, February.
    11. Alley Ibrahim S. & Adebayo Abimbola L. & Oligbi Blessing O., 2016. "Corporate Governance and Financial Performance Nexus: Any Bidirectional Causality?," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 50(1), pages 82-99, June.
    12. Paul Tanyi & David B. Smith & Xiaoyan Cheng, 2021. "Does firm payout policy affect shareholders’ dissatisfaction with directors?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 279-320, July.
    13. Arunima Haldar & S. V. D. Nageswara Rao & Kirankumar S. Momaya, 2016. "Can Flexibility in Corporate Governance Enhance International Competitiveness? Evidence from Knowledge-Based Industries in India," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 17(4), pages 389-402, December.
    14. Mouna Mrad & Slaheddine Hallara, 2014. "The Relationship Between the Board of Directors and the Performance/Value Creation in a Context of Privatization: The Case of French Companies," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 83-108, March.
    15. Ferris, Stephen P. & Yan, Xuemin (Sterling), 2007. "Do independent directors and chairmen matter? The role of boards of directors in mutual fund governance," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 13(2-3), pages 392-420, June.
    16. Vincenzo Scafarto & Federica Ricci & Elisabetta Magnaghi & Salvatore Ferri, 2021. "Board structure and intellectual capital efficiency: does the family firm status matter?," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(3), pages 841-878, September.
    17. Saha Rupjyoti & Kabra Kailash Chandra, 2019. "Does corporate governance influence firm performance? Evidence from India," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 5(4), pages 70-89, December.
    18. Volonté, Christophe, 2015. "Boards: Independent and committed directors?," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 25-37.
    19. Kimberly Gleason & Anita Pennathur & Joan Wiggenhorn, 2014. "Acquisitions of family owned firms: boon or bust?," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 38(2), pages 269-286, April.
    20. James Routledge & David Morrison, 2012. "Insolvency administration as a strategic response to financial distress," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 37(3), pages 441-459, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:annpce:v:85:y:2014:i:3:p:371-386. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=1370-4788 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.