IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/beh/jbepv1/v8y2024is1p30-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychological Effects of Communicating Temporal Best Prices

Author

Listed:
  • Ruud Lathouwers

    (Department of Social Psychology, and Tilburg Institute for Behavioral Economics Research (TIBER), Tilburg University)

  • Christoph Kogler

    (Department of Social Psychology, and Tilburg Institute for Behavioral Economics Research (TIBER), Tilburg University)

  • Marcel Zeelenberg

    (Department of Social Psychology, and Tilburg Institute for Behavioral Economics Research (TIBER), Tilburg University
    Department of Marketing, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam)

Abstract

When products or services are on discount, it is not always clear to consumers for what price these were sold before. To protect consumers, the European Union’s Omnibus Directive called for more transparency in discounts. In reaction to this, some companies started communicating what we call Temporal Best Prices (TBPs). TBPs indicate what the lowest price was in the last 30 days before the current discounted price. We manipulated whether the TBP was absent (control condition), lower than, equal to, or higher than the current discount for two products. When participants missed out on a better deal (TBPs were lower than the current discount), willingness to buy and perceptions of fairness were lower. Contrary to our expectations, when participants got a particularly good deal the willingness to buy and perceptions of fairness were unaffected. Perceptions of transparency were not affected by the manipulation of TBPs. In conclusion, historical price information in the form of TBPs seems to asymmetrically affect purchase intentions and fairness perceptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruud Lathouwers & Christoph Kogler & Marcel Zeelenberg, 2024. "Psychological Effects of Communicating Temporal Best Prices," Journal of Behavioral Economics for Policy, Society for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics (SABE), vol. 8(S1), pages 30-32, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:beh:jbepv1:v:8:y:2024:i:s1:p:30-32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://sabeconomics.org/journal/RePEc/beh/JBEPv1/articles/JBEP-8-S1-2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Butler, Adam & Highhouse, Scott, 2000. "Deciding to sell: The effect of prior inaction and offer source," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 21(3), pages 223-232, June.
    2. Liu, Hsin-Hsien & Chou, Hsuan-Yi, 2018. "Promotional formats and inaction inertia," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 22-32.
    3. Lu, Jingyi & Jia, Huiyuan & Xie, Xiaofei & Wang, Qiuhong, 2016. "Missing the best opportunity; who can seize the next one? Agents show less inaction inertia than personal decision makers," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 100-112.
    4. van Putten, Marijke & Zeelenberg, Marcel & van Dijk, Eric, 2013. "How consumers deal with missed discounts: Transaction decoupling, action orientation and inaction inertia," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 104-110.
    5. Hanna, Richard C. & Lemon, Katherine N. & Smith, Gerald E., 2019. "Is transparency a good thing? How online price transparency and variability can benefit firms and influence consumer decision making," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 227-236.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Hsin-Hsien & Chou, Hsuan-Yi, 2018. "Promotional formats and inaction inertia," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 22-32.
    2. Lu, Jingyi & Jia, Huiyuan & Xie, Xiaofei & Wang, Qiuhong, 2016. "Missing the best opportunity; who can seize the next one? Agents show less inaction inertia than personal decision makers," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 100-112.
    3. Vaida Kaduskeviciute & Sigitas Urbonavicius, 2019. "Webrooming: A Way of Dealing with Uncertainties in Purchasing," Tržište/Market, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Zagreb, vol. 31(2), pages 139-152.
    4. Carlos M Parra & Ranjita Poudel & Matthew Sutherland, 2021. "Towards an Understanding of Low-Income Individuals’ Financial Resiliency: Exploration of Risk Preferences, Personality Traits, and Savings Behavior," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 13(5), pages 32-54.
    5. Zhang, Ning & Fan, Xing & He, LiFeng & Cheng, Xin & Zhang, Liang & Liu, Rong, 2024. "The impact of the Seller's facial image on consumer purchase behavior in peer-to-peer accommodation platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    6. Zeelenberg, Marcel & Nijstad, Bernard A. & van Putten, Marijke & van Dijk, Eric, 2006. "Inaction inertia, regret, and valuation: A closer look," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 89-104, September.
    7. Janin K Hentzen & Arvid OI Hoffmann & Rebecca M Dolan, 2024. "The role of digital technology in communication and information flow in the Australian Superannuation industry," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 49(4), pages 657-677, November.
    8. Shani, Yaniv & Danziger, Shai & Zeelenberg, Marcel, 2015. "Choosing between options associated with past and future regret," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 107-114.
    9. Lu, Jingyi & Chen, Yuqi & Fang, Qingwen, 2022. "Promoting decision satisfaction: The effect of the decision target and strategy on process satisfaction," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1231-1239.
    10. Arkes, Hal R. & Kung, Yi-Han & Hutzel, Laura, 2002. "Regret, Valuation, and Inaction Inertia," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 371-385, March.
    11. Wasfi Alrawabdeh, 2022. "Seasonal balancing of revenue and demand in hotel industry: the case of Dubai City," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 36-49, February.
    12. Tong, Tingting & Xu, Xun & Yan, Nina & Chen, Zhineng, 2023. "Examining the impact of information provision on E-tailers’ pricing strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    13. Shiu-Li Huang & Ming-Yen Kuo, 2020. "Critical success factors in the sharing economy: a customer perspective," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 14(4), pages 553-576, December.
    14. Wood, Matthew S. & Williams, David W. & Drover, Will, 2017. "Past as prologue: Entrepreneurial inaction decisions and subsequent action judgments," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 107-127.
    15. Amir Hossein Sepehrian & Zahra Sadat Mirzazadeh & Malihe Sadat Aghaei Shahri, 2023. "Effect of price transparency on the perception of fair price and satisfaction with the purchase of sports products," Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(5), pages 327-337, October.
    16. Barrafrem, Kinga & Hausfeld, Jan, 2020. "Tracing risky decisions for oneself and others: The role of intuition and deliberation," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    17. David Bürgin & Robert Wilken, 2022. "Increasing Consumers’ Purchase Intentions Toward Fair-Trade Products Through Partitioned Pricing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(4), pages 1015-1040, December.
    18. Hagen, Johannes & Malisa, Amedeus, 2022. "Financial fraud and individual investment behavior," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 593-626.
    19. Dholakia, Utpal M. & Gopinath, Mahesh & Bagozzi, Richard P., 2005. "The role of desires in sequential impulsive choices," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 179-194, November.
    20. Wang, Yiru & Zamudio, César & Jewell, Robert D., 2023. "The more they know: Using transparent online communication to combat fake online reviews," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(6), pages 753-764.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:beh:jbepv1:v:8:y:2024:i:s1:p:30-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SABE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sabeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.