IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/beg/journl/v3y2024i2p14-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An empirical analysis of gender disparities in employment in South Africa: A Yun decomposition approach

Author

Listed:
  • S. Chivasa

    (Great Zimbabwe University)

  • P. G. Kadenge

    (Great Zimbabwe University)

  • G. Makuyana

    (Great Zimbabwe University)

Abstract

South Africa, the economic giant of Southern Africa, is still struggling to eliminate gender labour market inequalities, especially the gender employment gap, despite efforts made by the post-Apartheid government. This study aims to analyse the sources of gender labour inequalities in the South African labour market concerning labour force participation and employment. The sources of gender labour market inequalities were analysed using the cross-sectional data from South African labour Market Dynamics, the probit regression, the Yun (2005) decomposition techniques and the inverse Mill’s ratio to control for sample selection bias. The study focused on observable and measurable factors only. The study's results revealed that marital status, education, age and province of origin were the major drivers of the female employment gap of 0.688 and 0.0451. Females in South Africa were also found to be subjected to female employment discrimination with a perceived discrimination likelihood of 0.0766 and 0.106 when using expanded and strict definitions of unemployment respectively. More of the female employment gap was attributed to differences in individual characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Chivasa & P. G. Kadenge & G. Makuyana, 2024. "An empirical analysis of gender disparities in employment in South Africa: A Yun decomposition approach," Journal of Economic Policy and Management Issues, JEPMI, vol. 3(2), pages 14-25.
  • Handle: RePEc:beg:journl:v:3:y:2024:i:2:p:14-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jepmi.aesri.org/RePEc/beg/beg-journl/Repec-Paper2-3-2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:beg:journl:v:3:y:2024:i:2:p:14-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof Nicholas M Odhiambo (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.