IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bcp/journl/v7y2023i12p1826-1838.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In Stakeholder Capitalism, have all Actors Found Each Other or is it a Marriage of Convenience?

Author

Listed:
  • Blessing Dirani

    (PhD Candidate at the Women’s University in Africa, WUA (Zimbabwe).)

Abstract

In 2019, the Davos Manifesto was declared by one hundred and eighty-one Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) attending the Business Roundtable meeting who stated that a company’s purpose is to create shared and sustained value for all stakeholders. This statement was made in response to various global challenges such as climate change, environmental degradation, wealth inequality, poverty, and disease. This study aims to explore whether shareholder and stakeholder approaches of corporate governance are moving towards convergence and whether stakeholder capitalism is tenable. This study analyzed secondary data from various sources, including journals, presentations, debates, book reviews, and discussions. It also reviewed corporate governance models in Germany, the United States of America (USA), the United Kingdom (UK), the Republic of South Africa, and Malaysia thereby exploring their proximity to stakeholder capitalism. The study revealed that in practice there is gradual merging of shareholder and stakeholder approaches. Possible benefits and challenges in the adoption of stakeholder capitalism have been identified as well as possible solutions to those challenges. Further research is necessary to confirm stakeholder capitalism as a viable alternative to shareholder-centric approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Blessing Dirani, 2023. "In Stakeholder Capitalism, have all Actors Found Each Other or is it a Marriage of Convenience?," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(12), pages 1826-1838, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:7:y:2023:i:12:p:1826-1838
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/Digital-Library/volume-7-issue-12/1826-1838.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/articles/in-stakeholder-capitalism-have-all-actors-found-each-other-or-is-it-a-marriage-of-convenience/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon Jäger & Benjamin Schoefer & Jörg Heining, 2021. "Labor in the Boardroom," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 136(2), pages 669-725.
    2. David Mhlanga, 2022. "Stakeholder Capitalism, the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR), and Sustainable Development: Issues to Be Resolved," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Osama Wagdi & Eman Salman & Walid Abouzeid, 2021. "Maximizing Stockholder Wealth under Corporate Governance Mechanisms: Evidence from EGX," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(4), pages 1-1, April.
    4. Martin, John A. & Butler, Frank C., 2017. "Agent and stewardship behavior: How do they differ?," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(5), pages 633-646, September.
    5. Thomsen, Steen, 2016. "The Nordic Corporate Governance Model," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 189-204, March.
    6. Esinath Ndiweni & Welcome Sibanda, 2020. "CSR governance framework of South Africa, pre, during and post-apartheid: a manifestation of ubuntu values?," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 14(4), pages 363-383.
    7. Siepel, Josh & Nightingale, Paul, 2014. "Anglo-Saxon governance: Similarities, difference and outcomes in a financialised world," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 27-35.
    8. Aguilera, Ruth V. & Crespi-Cladera, Rafel, 2016. "Global corporate governance: On the relevance of firms’ ownership structure," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 50-57.
    9. Brian Schaefer, 2008. "Shareholders and Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 297-312, August.
    10. Andrew West, 2016. "Applying Metaethical and Normative Claims of Moral Relativism to (Shareholder and Stakeholder) Models of Corporate Governance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 199-215, May.
    11. Aida Maria Ismail & Izrul Haida Mohd Latiff, 2019. "Board Diversity and Corporate Sustainability Practices: Evidence on Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Reporting," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 10(3), pages 31-50, May.
    12. Edward Dennehy, 2012. "Corporate governance - a stakeholder model," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 83-95.
    13. Mohd Waliuddin Mohd Razali & Pan Xin Yi & Nordiana Ahmad Nordin & Anuar Muhammad & Janifer Lunyai, 2023. "Board diversity and firm value: A study on Malaysian listed firms in manufacturing and non-manufacturing sectors," Asian Development Policy Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 11(2), pages 110-122.
    14. Caterina Tantalo & Richard L. Priem, 2016. "Value creation through stakeholder synergy," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 314-329, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Goranova & Lori Verstegen Ryan, 2022. "The Corporate Objective Revisited: The Shareholder Perspective," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(2), pages 526-554, March.
    2. Kamini Gupta & Donal Crilly & Thomas Greckhamer, 2020. "Stakeholder engagement strategies, national institutions, and firm performance: A configurational perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(10), pages 1869-1900, October.
    3. Rekha Rao-Nicholson & Htwe Htwe Thein & Yifan Zhong, 2024. "A thematic analysis of the links between multinational enterprises’ corporate social responsibility and the Sustainable Development Goals in Myanmar," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(2), pages 203-223, June.
    4. Aseem Kaul & Jiao Luo, 2018. "An economic case for CSR: The comparative efficiency of for‐profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(6), pages 1650-1677, June.
    5. Modell, Sven & Yang, ChunLei, 2018. "Financialisation as a strategic action field: An historically informed field study of governance reforms in Chinese state-owned enterprises," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 41-59.
    6. Jaime-Andres Correa-Garcia & Maria-Antonia Garcia-Benau & Emma Garcia-Meca, 2018. "CSR Communication Strategies of Colombian Business Groups: An Analysis of Corporate Reports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, May.
    7. Richard Yeaw Chong Seow, 2024. "Determinants of environmental, social, and governance disclosure: A systematic literature review," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 2314-2330, March.
    8. Belloc, Filippo, 2021. "Industrial actions and firing regimes: How deregulating worker “Exit” reshapes worker “Voice”," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 251-264.
    9. Mertens, Matthias & Müller, Steffen & Neuschäffer, Georg, 2022. "Identifying rent-sharing using firms' energy input mix," IWH Discussion Papers 19/2022, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    10. Jose Garcia-Louzao & Ruben Perez-Sanz, 2024. "Women’s Voice at Work and Family-Friendly Firms," Bank of Lithuania Working Paper Series 120, Bank of Lithuania.
    11. Mir Dost & Waheed Ali Umrani, 2024. "Managerial Proactiveness, Frugal Innovation and Firm Performance," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 33(2), pages 393-417, May.
    12. Bai Xue & Zhuang Zhang & Pingli Li, 2020. "Corporate environmental performance, environmental management and firm risk," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1074-1096, March.
    13. Oehmichen, Jana, 2018. "East meets west—Corporate governance in Asian emerging markets: A literature review and research agenda," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 465-480.
    14. Abul Kalam Azad, 2014. "How to Spot Business Ethics?," International Journal of Management Sciences, Research Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 3(8), pages 544-547.
    15. Gastón Reyes, 2023. "The All-Stakeholders-Considered Case for Corporate Beneficence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 37-55, November.
    16. Graaf, Johan & Kraus, Kalle & Strömsten, Torkel, 2022. "The problematics of financialization – On the important (but neglected) horizontal axis of organizational action," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    17. Schembri, Joe & Tang, Yee Kwan & Fletcher, Margaret & Dimitratos, Pavlos, 2019. "How do European trade promotion organisations manage their stakeholders?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 1-1.
    18. Greiner, Michael & Kim, Jaemin & Cordon Thor, Jennifer, 2023. "Narcissistic CEOs and their corporate political activity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    19. Gaoke Liao & Peng Hou & Xiaoyan Shen & Khaldoon Albitar, 2021. "The impact of economic policy uncertainty on stock returns: The role of corporate environmental responsibility engagement," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 4386-4392, July.
    20. Diego Daruich & Sabrina Di Addario & Raffaele Saggio, 2023. "The Effects of Partial Employment Protection Reforms: Evidence from Italy," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 90(6), pages 2880-2942.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bcp:journl:v:7:y:2023:i:12:p:1826-1838. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.