IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bbl/journl/v27y2024i1p145-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effectiveness factors of small and medium-sized enterprises from the perspective of corporate culture: A case study in Slovakia

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Lorincova

    (Technical University in Zvolen)

  • Milos Hitka

    (Technical University in Zvolen)

  • Jozef Durian

    (Matej Bel University)

  • Daniel Rauser

    (Institute of Technology and Business in Ceske Budejovice)

Abstract

To reach business success, a company can use and manage a lot of seemingly inconspicuous and useful tools. One of them is corporate culture. The purpose of the paper is to define the factors that affect business efficiency from the perspective of corporate culture. The Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument (OCAI) was used. For data analysis, the Beta regression method, inductive statistics, and Tukey’s test were used. Based on the research results, it can be stated that there are significant differences in factors that affect the business efficiency of small and medium-sized enterprises in Slovakia from the perspective of corporate culture. The results show that effectiveness factors typical for clan corporate culture, such as teamwork, communication, loyalty, and human resource development, are applied in small enterprises. However, medium-sized enterprises are dominated by a hierarchical corporate culture with an emphasis on regulations, procedures, stability, control, and accuracy of management. It can be concluded that clan corporate culture is the best type of corporate culture for small and medium-sized enterprises in Slovakia. It is recommended to see the success of the enterprise in relation to caring for the people because employees represent a strategic tool in management that can influence the effectiveness of all business processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Lorincova & Milos Hitka & Jozef Durian & Daniel Rauser, 2024. "Effectiveness factors of small and medium-sized enterprises from the perspective of corporate culture: A case study in Slovakia," E&M Economics and Management, Technical University of Liberec, Faculty of Economics, vol. 27(1), pages 145-160, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bbl:journl:v:27:y:2024:i:1:p:145-160
    DOI: 10.15240/tul/001/2024-1-009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2024-1-009
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15240/tul/001/2024-1-009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mikušová, Marie & Klabusayová, Naděžda & Meier, Vojtěch, 2023. "Evaluation of organisational culture dimensions and their change due to the pandemic," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    2. Brody Heritage & Clare Pollock & Lynne Roberts, 2014. "Validation of the Organizational Culture Assessment Instrument," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-10, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samuel Ogbeibu & Abdelhak Senadjki & Jude Emelifeonwu & Paramjeet Singh Vohra, 2020. "Inspiring Creativity in Diverse Organizational Cultures: An Expatriate Integrity Dilemma," FIIB Business Review, , vol. 9(1), pages 28-41, March.
    2. Ogbeibu, Samuel & Senadjki, Abdelhak & Gaskin, James, 2018. "The moderating effect of benevolence on the impact of organisational culture on employee creativity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 334-346.
    3. Rudolf Kampf & Silvia Lorincová & Miloš Hitka & Ondrej Stopka, 2017. "Generational Differences in the Perception of Corporate Culture in European Transport Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Marie-Josée Fleury & Guy Grenier & Jean-Marie Bamvita & Lambert Farand, 2018. "Variables associated with job satisfaction among mental health professionals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, October.
    5. Gideon Keli Nzioki & Susan Njeri Ngunu, 2024. "Mediation of Mindsets in the Relationship Between Perceived Parental Psychological Control and Learned Helplessness Among Secondary School Students in Kenya," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(5), pages 460-473, May.
    6. Afiqah AMIN, 2022. "Analysis Of Organizational Culture In The Public Sector," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(4), pages 47-61, December.
    7. Limaj, Everist & Bernroider, Edward W.N., 2019. "The roles of absorptive capacity and cultural balance for exploratory and exploitative innovation in SMEs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 137-153.
    8. Florina Luiza Vlaicu & Alexandru Neagoe & Laurențiu Gabriel Țîru & Adrian Otovescu, 2019. "The Organizational Culture of a Major Social Work Institution in Romania: A Sociological Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-18, June.
    9. Silvia Lorincová, 2024. "Impact of COVID-19 on corporate culture," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 11(3), pages 99-117, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Business process effectiveness; corporate culture; OCAI; SMEs;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • A13 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Social Values

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bbl:journl:v:27:y:2024:i:1:p:145-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vendula Pospisilova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hflibcz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.