IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/isp/journl/v18y2024i1p185-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is Employment Intention Among Young People Influenced By Organizational Culture?

Author

Listed:
  • Vlad Diaconescu
  • Alina-Maria Vieriu
  • Iulia (Dăuș) Ogoreanu

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between organizational culture types (clan, adhocracy, hierarchy, and market) and Generation Z's (Gen Z) intentions to work for companies embodying strong cultures, as well as their interest in learning about these cultures during job interviews. It integrates Social Identity Theory (SIT) to understand how alignment between personal and organizational values influences engagement. A survey of 101 young respondents utilized multiple regression analysis to assess these relationships. Results indicated that clan culture significantly correlates with the intention to work in a company with a strong culture, reflecting Gen Z's preference for collaborative and community-oriented environments. Conversely, adhocracy culture exhibited a negative relationship with the intention to work, suggesting a disinterest in fast-paced, innovative settings that may lack stability, even as there exists a curiosity about such cultures during interviews. Market culture showed a positive association, indicating Gen Z's attraction to competitive environments with clear success metrics. Notably, the hierarchy culture yielded no significant preference among respondents, emphasizing a generational shift away from rigid structures. The findings underscore Gen Z's desire for meaningful, stable workplaces that align with their values, while also valuing environments that offer opportunities for achievement and growth. Organizations aiming to attract and retain Gen Z talent must balance innovation with community orientation, stability, and purpose. This study contributes to the literature by illustrating the nuanced preferences of a new generation entering the workforce, indicating a need for adaptable organizational practices that resonate with younger employees’ evolving expectations. Future research should delve deeper into these dynamics to support effective talent retention strategies in an ever-changing labor landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Vlad Diaconescu & Alina-Maria Vieriu & Iulia (Dăuș) Ogoreanu, 2024. "Is Employment Intention Among Young People Influenced By Organizational Culture?," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 18(1), pages 185-197.
  • Handle: RePEc:isp:journl:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:185-197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.scientific-publications.net/get/1000066/1730641073948447.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Inyong Shin & Won-Moo Hur & Seongho Kang, 2016. "Employees’ Perceptions of Corporate Social Responsibility and Job Performance: A Sequential Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-12, May.
    2. Meily Margaretha & Ardian Wicaksana, 2020. "The Relationship between Person Organization Fit Toward Organizational Commitment and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Experiences from Student Activity Organization Members," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 6(3), pages 43-49, March.
    3. Mikušová, Marie & Klabusayová, Naděžda & Meier, Vojtěch, 2023. "Evaluation of organisational culture dimensions and their change due to the pandemic," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    4. Omer Farooq & Marielle Payaud & Dwight Merunka & Pierre Valette-Florence, 2014. "The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organizational Commitment: Exploring Multiple Mediation Mechanisms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(4), pages 563-580, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Basheer M. Al-Ghazali & M. Sadiq Sohail & Ibrahim Ali M. Jumaan, 2021. "CSR Perceptions and Career Satisfaction: The Role of Psychological Capital and Moral Identity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-22, June.
    2. Faiza Manzoor & Longbao Wei & Mohammad Nurunnabi & Qazi Abdul Subhan & Syed Irshad Ali Shah & Samaher Fallatah, 2019. "The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Job Performance and CSR as Mediator in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Paraskevi (Evi) Dekoulou & Anna Anastasopoulou & Panagiotis Trivellas, 2023. "Employee Performance Implications of CSR for Organizational Resilience in the Banking Industry: The Mediation Role of Psychological Empowerment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-20, August.
    4. Xinming Deng & Xianyi Long & Douglas A. Schuler & Huan Luo & Xiaofei Zhao, 2020. "External corporate social responsibility and labor productivity: A S‐curve relationship and the moderating role of internal CSR and government subsidy," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 393-408, January.
    5. Heung-Jun Jung & Mohammad Ali, 2017. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Organizational Justice and Positive Employee Attitudes: In the Context of Korean Employment Relations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-24, October.
    6. Pasricha, Palvi & Nivedhitha, K.S. & Raghuvanshi, Juhi, 2023. "The perceived CSR-innovative behavior conundrum: Towards unlocking the socio-emotional black box," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    7. María Garrido‐Ruso & Beatriz Aibar‐Guzmán, 2022. "The moderating effect of contextual factors and employees' demographic features on the relationship between CSR and work‐related attitudes: A meta‐analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1839-1854, September.
    8. Byung-Jik Kim & Mohammad Nurunnabi & Tae-Hyun Kim & Taejoong Kim, 2018. "Doing Good Is Not Enough, You Should Have Been Authentic: Organizational Identification, Authentic Leadership and CSR," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    9. Inyong Shin & Won-Moo Hur & Minsung Kim & Seongho Kang, 2017. "Hidden Roles of CSR: Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility as a Preventive against Counterproductive Work Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-12, June.
    10. Behrooz Gharleghi & Asghar Afshar Jahanshahi & Khaled Nawaser, 2018. "The Outcomes of Corporate Social Responsibility to Employees: Empirical Evidence from a Developing Country," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, March.
    11. Zdenka Gyurák Babeľová & Augustín Stareček & Dagmar Cagáňová & Martin Fero & Miloš Čambál, 2019. "Perceived Serviceability of Outplacement Programs as a Part of Sustainable Human Resource Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-21, August.
    12. Hyewon Youn & Jong-Hyeong Kim, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Hotel Employees’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Roles of Organizational Pride and Meaningfulness of Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    13. Castaldo, Sandro & Ciacci, Andrea & Penco, Lara, 2023. "Perceived corporate social responsibility and job satisfaction in grocery retail: A comparison between low- and high-productivity stores," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    14. Minna Onomroba Abell, 2024. "Effect of Workplace Toxics on Employees Wellbeing in Nigeria Banking Sector," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(7), pages 368-384, July.
    15. Nematollah Shiri & Vahid Jafari‐Sadeghi, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and green behaviour: Towards sustainable food‐business development," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 605-620, March.
    16. Mansoora Ahmed & Sun Zehou & Syed Ali Raza & Muhammad Asif Qureshi & Sara Qamar Yousufi, 2020. "Impact of CSR and environmental triggers on employee green behavior: The mediating effect of employee well‐being," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2225-2239, September.
    17. Yun-Seok Hwang & Byung-Jik Kim, 2021. "“The Power of a Firm’s Benevolent Act”: The Influence of Work Overload on Turnover Intention, the Mediating Role of Meaningfulness of Work and the Moderating Effect of CSR Activities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-15, April.
    18. David A. Jones & Alexander Newman & Ruodan Shao & Fang Lee Cooke, 2019. "Advances in Employee-Focused Micro-Level Research on Corporate Social Responsibility: Situating New Contributions Within the Current State of the Literature," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 293-302, June.
    19. Maria Johann, 2022. "CSR Strategy in Tourism during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-12, March.
    20. Seunghee Im & Yang Woon Chung & Ji Yeon Yang, 2016. "Employees’ Participation in Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Person–CSR Fit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    organizational culture; social identity theory; generation z; employment intention; workplace dynamics;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A - General Economics and Teaching

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isp:journl:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:185-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Svetoslav Ivanov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.scientific-publications.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.