IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/baq/taprar/v6y2023i2p28-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improvement of enterprise risk visualization: risk mapping

Author

Listed:
  • Aib Abdelatif

    (Mentouri Brothers University Constantine)

  • Djamel Nettour

    (Higher National School of Engineering and Technology ENSTI)

  • Rachid Chaib

    (Mentouri Brothers University Constantine)

  • Ion Verzea

    (Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi)

  • Salim Bensehamdi

    (Higher National School of Engineering and Technology ENSTI)

Abstract

The object of the study is the risks that disrupt the accomplishment of any enterprise's missions. Therefore, mastering these risks is a significant asset for organizations and the overall health of the enterprise. Thus, working comprehensively on organizational risk prevention enables the enterprise to formulate a strategy aimed at guarding against all risk factors. Simultaneously, it identifies areas where more targeted actions need to be undertaken, potentially leading to positive changes within the company. To achieve this and allow for a robust and reliable assessment for better governance of harmful elements in the enterprise, we have used the risk mapping method. It is a data visualization tool aimed at highlighting vulnerabilities in various processes and activities that an organization faces, even allowing for informed decisions to prevent and cope with risks. Risk mapping is defined as the approach of identifying, evaluating, prioritizing, and managing risks inherent in an enterprise's activities. It even delves into a thorough investigation of all managerial, operational, and support processes that activities require implementing. This mapping technique is based on an objective, structured, and documented description of existing risks. The assessment allows for a more detailed analysis of initial and residual risks at all levels of the enterprise, thereby facilitating the development of a prioritized action plan accompanied by an analysis of its funding. This obligation is part of a continuous improvement approach to the quality of life and working conditions, even engaging in a sustainable management process. As a case study, we have chosen to focus on the SAIDAL Group of Constantine. Through this case study, we aim to illustrate the practical implications and benefits of using risk mapping as a strategic tool for risk management in a complex organizational context. Now, having a risk map not only promotes a proactive approach to risk mitigation but also contributes to broader goals of continuous improvement and sustainable risk management practices: a necessity for any enterprise.

Suggested Citation

  • Aib Abdelatif & Djamel Nettour & Rachid Chaib & Ion Verzea & Salim Bensehamdi, 2023. "Improvement of enterprise risk visualization: risk mapping," Technology audit and production reserves, PC TECHNOLOGY CENTER, vol. 6(2(74)), pages 28-36, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:baq:taprar:v:6:y:2023:i:2:p:28-36
    DOI: 10.15587/2706-5448.2023.291959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.uran.ua/tarp/article/download/291959/285725
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15587/2706-5448.2023.291959?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wieczorek-Kosmala, Monika, 2014. "Risk management practices from risk maturity models perspective," Journal of East European Management Studies, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 19(2), pages 133-159.
    2. Ferreira de Araújo Lima, Priscila & Crema, Maria & Verbano, Chiara, 2020. "Risk management in SMEs: A systematic literature review and future directions," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 78-94.
    3. Ramezani, Javaneh & Camarinha-Matos, Luis M., 2020. "Approaches for resilience and antifragility in collaborative business ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    4. Aven, Terje & Renn, Ortwin, 2018. "Improving government policy on risk: Eight key principles," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 230-241.
    5. Wieczorek-Kosmala, Monika, 2014. "Risk management practices from risk maturity models perspective," Journal of East European Management Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 19(2), pages 133-159.
    6. Arena, Marika & Arnaboldi, Michela & Palermo, Tommaso, 2017. "The dynamics of (dis)integrated risk management: a comparative field study," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 84285, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José Ruiz-Canela López, 2021. "How Can Enterprise Risk Management Help in Evaluating the Operational Risks for a Telecommunications Company?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, March.
    2. Eduart Villanueva & María Antonia Nuñez & Izaias Martins, 2022. "Impact Of Risk Governance, Associated Practices and Tools on Enterprise Risk Management: Some Evidence from Colombia," Revista Finanzas y Politica Economica, Universidad Católica de Colombia, vol. 14(1), pages 187-206, January.
    3. Elisane Brandt & Márcia Zanievicz da Silva & Franciele Beck, 2021. "Influence of Family Culture on Enterprise Risk Management in Brazilian Companies," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 25(6), pages 190082-1900.
    4. Edward I. Altman & Marco Balzano & Alessandro Giannozzi & Stjepan Srhoj, 2023. "Revisiting SME default predictors: The Omega Score," Journal of Small Business Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(6), pages 2383-2417, November.
    5. Alexander Nieuwborg & Suzanne Hiemstra-van Mastrigt & Marijke Melles & Jan Zekveld & Sicco Santema, 2023. "A Categorization of Resilience: A Scoping Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Baier-Fuentes, Hugo & Andrade-Valbuena, Nelson A. & Huertas Gonzalez-Serrano, Maria & Gaviria-Marin, Magaly, 2023. "Bricolage as an effective tool for the survival of owner-managed SMEs during crises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    7. Plante, Maude & Free, Clinton & Andon, Paul, 2021. "Making artworks valuable: Categorisation and modes of valuation work," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    8. Lima, Eliana Sangreman & Costa, Ana Paula Cabral Seixas, 2019. "Improving Asset Management under a regulatory view," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    9. Winston Jerónimo Silvestre & Ana Fonseca & Sandra Naomi Morioka, 2022. "Strategic sustainability integration: Merging management tools to support business model decisions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2052-2067, July.
    10. Alexander Mirowski & Brian P. Harper, 2019. "Elements of Infrastructure Demand in Multiplayer Video Games," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 237-246.
    11. da Silva, Agostinho & Almeida, Isabel, 2020. "Towards INDUSTRY 4.0 | a case STUDY in ornamental stone sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    12. Alberto Cerezo-Narváez & Andrés Pastor-Fernández & Manuel Otero-Mateo & Pablo Ballesteros-Pérez, 2022. "The Influence of Knowledge on Managing Risk for the Success in Complex Construction Projects: The IPMA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, August.
    13. Assem Abu Hatab & Carl‐Johan Lagerkvist & Abourehab Esmat, 2021. "Risk perception and determinants in small‐ and medium‐sized agri‐food enterprises amidst the COVID‐19 pandemic: Evidence from Egypt," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(1), pages 187-212, January.
    14. Björn Lundgren & H. Orri Stefánsson, 2020. "Against the De Minimis Principle," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(5), pages 908-914, May.
    15. Gundula Glowka & Richard Hule & Anita Zehrer, 2024. "Risk perception of SMEs: strategic risks, family-related risks, external risks," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(4), pages 1-27, December.
    16. Oliveira Cidália & Barata Vanessa & Rodrigues Margarida, 2024. "Due Diligence Associated with Risk Management and Linked to Management Control," Journal of Intercultural Management, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 49-75, March.
    17. Terje Aven, 2018. "Reflections on the Use of Conceptual Research in Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(11), pages 2415-2423, November.
    18. Václav Kupec & Přemysl Písař & Michal Lukáč & Gabriela Pajtinková Bartáková, 2021. "Conceptual Comparison of Internal Audit and Internal Control in the Marketing Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-18, June.
    19. Yongyi Shou & Xueshu Shan & Jinan Shao & Kee-hung Lai & Qing Zhou, 2024. "How Do Foreign SMEs Mitigate Violent Conflict Risk by Doing Good? An Instrumental Stakeholder Theory Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 192(2), pages 407-422, June.
    20. Münch, Christopher & Marx, Emanuel, 2022. "Supply ecosystems and the concept of resilience: A literature review," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Kersten, Wolfgang & Jahn, Carlos & Blecker, Thorsten & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Changing Tides: The New Role of Resilience and Sustainability in Logistics and Supply Chain Management – Innovative Approaches for the Shift to a New , volume 33, pages 39-66, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:baq:taprar:v:6:y:2023:i:2:p:28-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iryna Prudius (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.uran.ua/tarp/issue/archive .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.