IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jmathe/v11y2023i6p1414-d1097624.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stylized Model of Lévy Process in Risk Estimation

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Yun

    (Silc Business School, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Yanyi Ye

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China)

  • Hao Liu

    (Fundamental Technology Center, China Construction Bank Financial Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200120, China)

  • Yi Li

    (School of Management, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Kin-Keung Lai

    (International Business School, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710062, China)

Abstract

Risk management is a popular and important problem in academia and industry. From a small-scale system, such as city logistics, to a large-scale system, such as the supply chain of a global industrial or financial system, efficient risk management is required to prevent loss from uncertainty. In this paper, we assume that risk factors follow the Lévy process, and propose a stylized model, based on regression, that can estimate the risk of a complicated system under the framework of nest simulation. Specifically, portfolio risk estimation using the Lévy process is discussed as an example. The stylized model simplifies the risk factors artificially, and provides useful basis functions to fit the portfolio loss with little computational effort. Numerical experiments showed the good performance of the stylized model in estimating risk for the Variance Gamma process and the Normal Inverse Gaussian process, which are two examples of the Lévy process.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Yun & Yanyi Ye & Hao Liu & Yi Li & Kin-Keung Lai, 2023. "Stylized Model of Lévy Process in Risk Estimation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:6:p:1414-:d:1097624
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/6/1414/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/6/1414/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gregory P. Hopper, 1996. "Value at risk: a new methodology for measuring portfolio risk," Business Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, issue Jul, pages 19-31.
    2. Ravi Jagannathan & Tongshu Ma, 2003. "Risk Reduction in Large Portfolios: Why Imposing the Wrong Constraints Helps," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 58(4), pages 1651-1683, August.
    3. Yamai, Yasuhiro & Yoshiba, Toshinao, 2005. "Value-at-risk versus expected shortfall: A practical perspective," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 997-1015, April.
    4. Amulya Gurtu & Jestin Johny, 2021. "Supply Chain Risk Management: Literature Review," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Paul Glasserman & Philip Heidelberger & Perwez Shahabuddin, 2002. "Portfolio Value‐at‐Risk with Heavy‐Tailed Risk Factors," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 239-269, July.
    6. Mark Broadie & Yiping Du & Ciamac C. Moallemi, 2015. "Risk Estimation via Regression," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(5), pages 1077-1097, October.
    7. Sait Cakmak & Di Wu & Enlu Zhou, 2021. "Solving Bayesian risk optimization via nested stochastic gradient estimation," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(10), pages 1081-1093, October.
    8. Ferreira de Araújo Lima, Priscila & Crema, Maria & Verbano, Chiara, 2020. "Risk management in SMEs: A systematic literature review and future directions," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 78-94.
    9. William Ho & Tian Zheng & Hakan Yildiz & Srinivas Talluri, 2015. "Supply chain risk management: a literature review," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(16), pages 5031-5069, August.
    10. Guangxin Jiang & L. Jeff Hong & Barry L. Nelson, 2020. "Online Risk Monitoring Using Offline Simulation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 356-375, April.
    11. repec:bla:jfinan:v:58:y:2003:i:4:p:1651-1684 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Haihui Shen & L. Jeff Hong & Xiaowei Zhang, 2018. "Enhancing stochastic kriging for queueing simulation with stylized models," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(11), pages 943-958, November.
    13. Susanne Emmer & Marie Kratz & Dirk Tasche, 2013. "What is the best risk measure in practice? A comparison of standard measures," Papers 1312.1645, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2015.
    14. L. Jeff Hong & Sandeep Juneja & Guangwu Liu, 2017. "Kernel Smoothing for Nested Estimation with Application to Portfolio Risk Measurement," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(3), pages 657-673, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guangxin Jiang & L. Jeff Hong & Barry L. Nelson, 2020. "Online Risk Monitoring Using Offline Simulation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 356-375, April.
    2. Juan Carlos Escanciano & Zaichao Du, 2015. "Backtesting Expected Shortfall: Accounting for Tail Risk," CAEPR Working Papers 2015-001, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Department of Economics, Indiana University Bloomington.
    3. David J. Eckman & Shane G. Henderson & Sara Shashaani, 2023. "Diagnostic Tools for Evaluating and Comparing Simulation-Optimization Algorithms," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 350-367, March.
    4. Mingbin Ben Feng & Eunhye Song, 2020. "Efficient Nested Simulation Experiment Design via the Likelihood Ratio Method," Papers 2008.13087, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    5. Pitera, Marcin & Schmidt, Thorsten, 2018. "Unbiased estimation of risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 133-145.
    6. Alfonso Novales & Laura Garcia-Jorcano, 2019. "Backtesting Extreme Value Theory models of expected shortfall," Documentos de Trabajo del ICAE 2019-24, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico.
    7. Osmundsen, Kjartan Kloster, 2018. "Using expected shortfall for credit risk regulation," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 80-93.
    8. Runhuan Feng & Peng Li, 2021. "Sample Recycling Method -- A New Approach to Efficient Nested Monte Carlo Simulations," Papers 2106.06028, arXiv.org.
    9. Kun Zhang & Ben Mingbin Feng & Guangwu Liu & Shiyu Wang, 2022. "Sample Recycling for Nested Simulation with Application in Portfolio Risk Measurement," Papers 2203.15929, arXiv.org.
    10. Nifei Lin & Yingda Song & L. Jeff Hong, 2024. "Efficient Nested Estimation of CoVaR: A Decoupled Approach," Papers 2411.01319, arXiv.org.
    11. Weihuan Huang & Nifei Lin & L. Jeff Hong, 2022. "Monte-Carlo Estimation of CoVaR," Papers 2210.06148, arXiv.org.
    12. Dang, Ou & Feng, Mingbin & Hardy, Mary R., 2023. "Two-stage nested simulation of tail risk measurement: A likelihood ratio approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 1-24.
    13. Chang, Chia-Lin & Jimenez-Martin, Juan-Angel & Maasoumi, Esfandiar & McAleer, Michael & Pérez-Amaral, Teodosio, 2019. "Choosing expected shortfall over VaR in Basel III using stochastic dominance," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 95-113.
    14. Timo Dimitriadis & Yannick Hoga, 2023. "Regressions under Adverse Conditions," Papers 2311.13327, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2024.
    15. Lucio Fernandez‐Arjona & Damir Filipović, 2022. "A machine learning approach to portfolio pricing and risk management for high‐dimensional problems," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 982-1019, October.
    16. Liu, Xiaoyu & Yan, Xing & Zhang, Kun, 2024. "Kernel quantile estimators for nested simulation with application to portfolio value-at-risk measurement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(3), pages 1168-1177.
    17. Sobreira, Nuno & Louro, Rui, 2020. "Evaluation of volatility models for forecasting Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall in the Portuguese stock market," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 32(C).
    18. Mahmoud Z. Mistarihi & Ghazi M. Magableh, 2023. "Unveiling Supply Chain Nervousness: A Strategic Framework for Disruption Management under Fuzzy Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-26, July.
    19. Immo Stadtmüller & Benjamin R. Auer & Frank Schuhmacher, 2024. "Core-satellite investing with commodity futures momentum," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(3), pages 261-287, May.
    20. Hongjun Ha & Daniel Bauer, 2022. "A least-squares Monte Carlo approach to the estimation of enterprise risk," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 417-459, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jmathe:v:11:y:2023:i:6:p:1414-:d:1097624. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.