IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jlofdr/342883.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In-field Food Waste in California Strawberry Production: An Analysis of Harvester Extraction Rates

Author

Listed:
  • Delbridge, Timothy A.
  • Zukoff, Sarah N.

Abstract

In this paper, we report on the collection and analysis of two years of “harvest efficiency” data from commercial strawberry farms in California. Harvest efficiency refers to the percentage of total ripe berries that are successfully harvested from the field and has implications for assessing food waste, the relative attractiveness of robotic harvest innovations, and management decisions related to field sanitation and pest management. Results indicate that within the sampled farms, between 12% and 39% of the total strawberries produced were left in the field, with production practices and the time of year significantly affecting this rate.

Suggested Citation

  • Delbridge, Timothy A. & Zukoff, Sarah N., 2023. "In-field Food Waste in California Strawberry Production: An Analysis of Harvester Extraction Rates," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 54(04), November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:342883
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.342883
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/342883/files/In-field%20Food%20Waste.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.342883?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rachel Soper, 2020. "How wage structure and crop size negatively impact farmworker livelihoods in monocrop organic production: interviews with strawberry harvesters in California," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(2), pages 325-336, June.
    2. Alexandra E. Hill & Jesse Burkhardt, 2021. "Peers in the Field: The Role of Ability and Gender in Peer Effects among Agricultural Workers," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(3), pages 790-811, May.
    3. Stephen F. Hamilton & Timothy J. Richards & Aric P. Shafran & Kathryn N. Vasilaky, 2022. "Farm labor productivity and the impact of mechanization," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(4), pages 1435-1459, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Timothy J. Richards & Zachariah Rutledge & Marcelo Castillo, 2024. "Labor shortages and agricultural trucking rates," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 72(2), pages 105-129, June.
    2. Wawrzyniec Czubak & Krzysztof Piotr Pawłowski, 2024. "The Impact of Agricultural Investments on the Economic Efficiency of Production Factors: An Empirical Study of the Wielkopolska Voivodeship," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Sheng Xu & Jingwen Wang, 2023. "The Impact of Digital Financial Inclusion on the Level of Agricultural Output," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Delbridge, Timothy A. & Zukoff, Sarah N., 2023. "In-field Food Waste in California Strawberry Production: An Analysis of Harvester Extraction Rates," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 54(3), November.
    5. Calvin, Linda & Martin, Philip & Simnitt, Skyler, 2022. "Supplement to Adjusting to Higher Labor Costs in Selected U.S. Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Industries: Case Studies," USDA Miscellaneous 323871, United States Department of Agriculture.
    6. Roman, Shahrear & Hadi & Wuepper, David, 2024. "Agricultural Mechanization Around the World," Discussion Papers 348369, University of Bonn, Institute for Food and Resource Economics.
    7. Alexandra E. Hill & Jesse Burkhardt & Jude Bayham & Katelyn O'Dell & Bonne Ford & Emily V. Fischer & Jeffrey R. Pierce, 2024. "Air pollution, weather, and agricultural worker productivity," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(4), pages 1329-1353, August.
    8. Sophie Kelmenson, 2023. "Between the farm and the fork: job quality in sustainable food systems," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(1), pages 317-358, March.
    9. Stephen F. Hamilton & Timothy J. Richards & Aric P. Shafran & Kathryn N. Vasilaky, 2022. "Farm labor productivity and the impact of mechanization," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(4), pages 1435-1459, August.
    10. repec:ags:aaea22:335904 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Calvin, Linda & Martin, Philip & Simnitt, Skyler, 2022. "Supplement to Adjusting to Higher Labor Costs in Selected U.S. Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Industries: Case Studies," Administrative Publications 327333, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    12. Anelyse M. Weiler, 2022. "Seeing the workers for the trees: exalted and devalued manual labour in the Pacific Northwest craft cider industry," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(1), pages 65-78, March.
    13. Meng, Meng & Zhang, Wuke & Zhu, Xi & Shi, Qinghua, 2024. "Agricultural mechanization and rural worker mobility: Evidence from the Agricultural Machinery Purchase Subsidies programme in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    14. Guifang Su & Zhe Chen & Wei Li & Xianli Xia, 2024. "Study on the Impact of the Rural Population Aging on Agricultural Total Factor Productivity in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, November.
    15. Adane Tufa & Arega Alene & Hambulo Ngoma & Paswel Marenya & Julius Manda & Md Abdul Matin & Christian Thierfelder & David Chikoye, 2024. "Willingness to pay for agricultural mechanization services by smallholder farmers in Malawi," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(1), pages 248-276, January.
    16. Alexandra E. Hill & Timothy K. M. Beatty, 2024. "Evidence on quality spillovers from speed enhancing policies in the workplace," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 62(4), pages 1520-1538, October.
    17. Julien, Jacques C. & Bravo-Ureta, Boris E. & Rada, Nicholas E., 2023. "Gender and agricultural Productivity: Econometric evidence from Malawi, Tanzania, and Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jlofdr:342883. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fdrssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.