IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/jasfmr/198515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attributes of U.S. Farms by Number of Generations the Farm Has Been in a Family

Author

Listed:
  • Zulauf, Carl

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Zulauf, Carl, 2004. "Attributes of U.S. Farms by Number of Generations the Farm Has Been in a Family," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2004, pages 1-4.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:jasfmr:198515
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.198515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/198515/files/209.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.198515?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David N. Laband & Bernard F. Lentz, 1983. "Occupational Inheritance in Agriculture," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 65(2), pages 311-314.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brian E. Roe, 2015. "The Risk Attitudes of U.S. Farmers," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 37(4), pages 553-574.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Conway, Shane Francis & McDonagh, John & Farrell, Maura & Kinsella, Anne, 2019. "Human dynamics and the intergenerational farm transfer process in later life: A roadmap for future generational renewal in agriculture policy," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 8(1), August.
    2. Miles Corak & Patrizio Piraino, 2011. "The Intergenerational Transmission of Employers," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 29(1), pages 37-68, January.
    3. Lina Andersson & Mats Hammarstedt, 2010. "Intergenerational transmissions in immigrant self-employment: Evidence from three generations," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 261-276, April.
    4. Glauben, Thomas & Tietje, Hendrik & Weiss, Christoph R., 2002. "Intergenerational Succession on Family Farms: Evidence from Survey Data," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24918, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Galor, Oded & Tsiddon, Daniel, 1997. "Technological Progress, Mobility, and Economic Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 87(3), pages 363-382, June.
    6. Chi Su & Richard A. Schoney & James F. Nolan, 2023. "Buy, sell or rent the farm: succession planning and the future of farming on the Great Plains," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 18(3), pages 627-669, July.
    7. Tietje, Hendrik, 2003. "Hofnachfolgesituation in Deutschland: Eine empirische Analyse von Querschnittsdaten auf Kreisebene," FE Working Papers 0301, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Department of Food Economics and Consumption Studies.
    8. Américo Mendes, 2005. "Intergenerational transfers in rural households: A game theoretical approach," Labor and Demography 0503004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Peter A. Groothuis & Jana D. Groothuis, 2008. "Nepotism or Family Tradition? A Study of NASCAR Drivers," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 9(3), pages 250-265, June.
    10. Carillo, Felicetta & Carillo, Maria Rosaria & Venittelli, Tiziana & Zazzaro, Alberto, 2013. "Aging and succession on Italian farms," Politica Agricola Internazionale - International Agricultural Policy, Edizioni L'Informatore Agrario, vol. 2013(1), March.
    11. Shane Francis Conway & Maura Farrell & John McDonagh & Anne Kinsella, 2022. "‘Farmers Don’t Retire’: Re-Evaluating How We Engage with and Understand the ‘Older’ Farmer’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-11, February.
    12. Meunier, Elliot & Smith, Pauline & Griessinger, Thibaud & Robert, Corinne, 2024. "Understanding changes in reducing pesticide use by farmers: Contribution of the behavioural sciences," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    13. Dudek, Michał & Pawłowska, Aleksandra, 2022. "Can succession improve the economic situation of family farms in the short term? Evidence from Poland based on panel data," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    14. Uchiyama, Tomohiro & Lobley, Matt & Errington, Andrew & Yanagimura, Shunsuke, 2008. "Dimensions of Intergenerational Farm Business Transfers in Canada, England, the USA and Japan," Japanese Journal of Agricultural Economics (formerly Japanese Journal of Rural Economics), Agricultural Economics Society of Japan (AESJ), vol. 10, pages 1-16.
    15. Danilo Bertoni & Daniele Cavicchioli & Laure Latruffe, 2023. "Impact of business transfer on economic performance: the case of Italian family farms," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 48(2), pages 186-213.
    16. repec:ags:aaea22:335779 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Alessandro Corsi & Vito Frontuto & Silvia Novelli, 2021. "What Drives Farm Structural Change? An Analysis of Economic, Demographic and Succession Factors," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-24, May.
    18. Bodo Knoll & Nadine Riedel & Eva Schlenker, 2013. "He's a Chip Off the Old Block: The Persistency of Occupational Choices among Generations," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 561, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    19. Bodo Knoll & Nadine Riedel & Eva Schlenker, 2017. "He's a Chip Off the Old Block — The Persistence of Occupational Choices Across Generations," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 31(2), pages 174-203, June.
    20. Andermann, Gerhard & Schmitt, Günther, 1996. "Die Bestimmungsgründe der Beschäftigung in der Landwirtschaft : eine quantitative Analyse der kurzfristigen Anpassung der Größe und Struktur des Arbeitskräftebestandes der Landwirtschaft im früheren B," Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 29(4), pages 630-655.
    21. Mats Hammarstedt & Chizheng Miao, 2020. "Self-employed immigrants and their employees: evidence from Swedish employer-employee data," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 35-68, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:jasfmr:198515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/asfmrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.