IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ifaamr/316303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Demand analysis of peanuts and tree nuts in the United States: a micro-perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Cheng, 'Chris' Guo
  • Capps, Oral Jr.
  • Dharmasena, Senarath

Abstract

This paper examines household purchases of peanuts and tree nuts in the United States using the Nielsen Homescan Panel for calendar year 2015. Households located in different regions and from different races and ethnicities along with seasonality were important factors affecting the propensities to purchase and actual quantities purchased. The demand for pecans, almonds, and walnuts was sensitive to price changes. The reverse was true regarding the demands for cashews, macadamia nuts, pistachios, mixed nuts, and peanuts. All nuts were identified as necessities. Findings of this research provide insights for stakeholders in the nut industry, in terms of target marketing, product positioning, and pricing strategies. Moreover, we contribute to the literature by providing a micro-perspective investigation concerning the demand for nut products in the United States. In addition, we provide a more up-to-date analysis concerning factors affecting not only the likelihood of purchasing nuts but also the quantities purchased.

Suggested Citation

  • Cheng, 'Chris' Guo & Capps, Oral Jr. & Dharmasena, Senarath, 2021. "Demand analysis of peanuts and tree nuts in the United States: a micro-perspective," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 24(3), February.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifaamr:316303
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.316303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/316303/files/ifamr2021.0019.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.316303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pedro A. Alviola & Oral Capps, 2010. "Household demand analysis of organic and conventional fluid milk in the United States based on the 2004 Nielsen Homescan panel," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 369-388.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Capps, Oral & Wang, Lingxiao, 2024. "U.S. Household Demand System Analysis for Dairy Milk Products and Plant-Based Milk Alternatives," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343575, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Clement O. Codjia & Sayed H. Saghaian, 2022. "Determinants of Food Expenditure Patterns: Evidence from U.S. Consumers in the Context of the COVID-19 Price Shocks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-17, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, GwanSeon & Mark, Tyler, 2018. "Who are Consuming Hemp Products in the U.S.? Evidence from Nielsen Homescan Data," 2018 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2018, Jacksonville, Florida 266671, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    2. Taylor, Mykel & Klaiber, H. Allen & Kuchler, Fred, 2016. "Changes in U.S. consumer response to food safety recalls in the shadow of a BSE scare," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 56-64.
    3. Ghazaryan, Armen & Bonanno, Alessandro & Carlson, Andrea, 2023. "I Say Milk, You Say Mylk. Demand Separability in a Broadened Milk Category," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 48(2), May.
    4. Céline Bonnet & Zohra Bouamra-Mechemache, 2016. "Organic Label, Bargaining Power, and Profit-sharing in the French Fluid Milk Market," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 98(1), pages 113-133.
    5. Schroeck, Rebecca, 2011. "A Demand System Analysis of Organic and Conventional Fresh Milk in Germany Segmented by Consumer Groups," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 115995, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Lars Gårn Hansen & Laura Mørch Andersen, 2013. "Does Organic Crowding Out Influence Organic Food Demand? – evidence from a Danish micro panel," IFRO Working Paper 2013/2, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    7. GwanSeon Kim & Jun Ho Seok & Tyler B. Mark, 2018. "New Market Opportunities and Consumer Heterogeneity in the U.S. Organic Food Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Hanna Lindström, 2022. "The Swedish consumer market for organic and conventional milk: A demand system analysis," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(3), pages 505-532, July.
    9. Lee, Yinjin & Bateman, Alexis, 2021. "The competitiveness of fair trade and organic versus conventional coffee based on consumer panel data," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    10. Lindström, Hanna, 2021. "The Swedish consumer market for organic and conventional milk: A demand system analysis," Umeå Economic Studies 998, Umeå University, Department of Economics.
    11. Philip Garland Gayle & Jin Wang & Shengnan Fang, 2023. "The Organic food price premium and its susceptibility to news media coverage: evidence from the US milk industry," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(28), pages 3296-3315, June.
    12. Oral Capps & Muxi Cheng & Jennifer Kee & Samuel L. Priestley, 2023. "A cross‐sectional analysis of the demand for coffee in the United States," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 494-514, March.
    13. Bougherara Douadia & Ropars-Collet Carole & Saint-Gilles Jude, 2022. "Impact of Private Labels and Information Campaigns on Organic and Fair Trade Food Demand," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 20(1), pages 39-59, May.
    14. DeLong, Karen L. & Jensen, Kimberly L. & Upendram, Sreedhar & Eckelkamp, Elizabeth, . "Consumer Preferences for Tennessee Milk," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 51(2).
    15. Hu, Yang & Dharmasena, Senarath & Capps, Oral Jr. & Janakiraman, Ramkumar, . "The Growing Market for Energy and Sports Drinks in the United States: Can Chocolate Milk Remain a Contender?," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 51(2).
    16. Dong, Diansheng & Stewart, Hayden, 2013. "Households' Choices Among Fluid Milk Products: What Happens When Income and Prices Change?," Economic Research Report 262226, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    17. Choi, Hee Jung & Wohlgenant, Michael K., 2012. "Demand Analysis of Fluid Milk with Different Attributes," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124746, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    18. Maximilian Koppenberg, 2023. "Markups, organic agriculture and downstream concentration at the example of European dairy farmers," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 54(2), pages 161-178, March.
    19. Zhuang, Yan & Dimitri, Carolyn & Jaenicke, Edward C., 2010. "Price Reactions And Organic Price Premiums For Private Label And Branded Milk," 115th Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, September 15-17, 2010, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany 116388, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Mosadegh Sedghy, B. & Nematollahi, Mohammadreza & Tajbakhsh, Alireza, 2024. "Market dynamics between retail channels and short food supply chains: A case of organic fruits," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Demand and Price Analysis;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifaamr:316303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifamaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.