IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/erdnra/314093.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Principles of Agribusiness Social Responsibility From Farmer’s Point of View: Lithuanian Case

Author

Listed:
  • Rita, Vilkė
  • Živilė, Gedminaitė-Raudonė

Abstract

The phenomena of corporate social responsibility (CSR) had been widely discussed from different scientific and practical perspectives worldwide for almost a century. In its initial phase, the main focus was the demand for social responsibilities from businesses in general. Recently, all sectors and all spheres of human activity consider the importance and use of social responsibility, including agribusiness. This study aims to elucidate the importance of the principles of agribusiness social responsibility from a farmer’s point of view. The guiding question of the research is whether a farmer’s gender, next to the other background characteristics (age, generation, education, etc.), is among the factors that shape the way farmers understand the importance of the principles of agribusiness social responsibility. The research results, based on representative survey data of Lithuanian farmers (N=1108), propose that gender might be considered among the factors that shape farmers’ understanding of the principles of agribusiness social responsibility and this makes a promising background for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Rita, Vilkė & Živilė, Gedminaitė-Raudonė, 2020. "The Principles of Agribusiness Social Responsibility From Farmer’s Point of View: Lithuanian Case," Rural Areas and Development, European Rural Development Network (ERDN), vol. 17.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:erdnra:314093
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.314093
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/314093/files/2020-RAD-17_81-89%20Rita%20Vilk%C4%97%2C%20%C5%BDivil%C4%97%20Gedminait%C4%97-Raudon%C4%97.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.314093?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grosser, Kate & Moon, Jeremy, 2008. "Developments in company reporting on workplace gender equality?," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 179-198.
    2. Nekhili, Mehdi & Nagati, Haithem & Chtioui, Tawhid & Nekhili, Ali, 2017. "Gender-diverse board and the relevance of voluntary CSR reporting," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 81-100.
    3. repec:hal:journl:hal-02311979 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Kate Grosser & Jeremy Moon, 2019. "CSR and Feminist Organization Studies: Towards an Integrated Theorization for the Analysis of Gender Issues," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 321-342, March.
    5. Kate Grosser & Jeremy Moon, 2008. "Developments in company reporting on workplace gender equality?," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 179-198, September.
    6. Belaid Rettab & Kamel Mellahi (ed.), 2019. "Practising CSR in the Middle East," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-02044-6, December.
    7. Kate Grosser, 2016. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Multi-Stakeholder Governance: Pluralism, Feminist Perspectives and Women’s NGOs," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 65-81, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kate Grosser & Jeremy Moon, 2019. "CSR and Feminist Organization Studies: Towards an Integrated Theorization for the Analysis of Gender Issues," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(2), pages 321-342, March.
    2. Austin, Chelsea Rae & Bobek, Donna D. & Harris, Ling L., 2021. "Does information about gender pay matter to investors? An experimental investigation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    3. Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez & Valentina Minutiello & Patrizia Tettamanzi, 2022. "Gender disclosure: The impact of peer behaviour and the firm's equality policies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 385-405, March.
    4. Leire Gartzia, 2021. "Gender Equality in Business Action: A Multi-Agent Change Management Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, May.
    5. Barone, Elisabetta & Ranamagar, Nathan & Solomon, Jill F., 2013. "A Habermasian model of stakeholder (non)engagement and corporate (ir)responsibility reporting," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 163-181.
    6. Gray, Rob & Gray, Sue, 2011. "Accountability and human rights: A tentative exploration and a commentary," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(8), pages 781-789.
    7. Walaa Wahid ElKelish*, 2023. "Accounting for Corporate Human Rights: Literature Review and Future Insights," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 33(2), pages 203-226, June.
    8. Utoft, Ea Høg, 2020. "Exploring linkages between organisational culture and gender equality work—An ethnography of a multinational engineering company," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    9. Marcelle Colares Oliveira & Manuel Salgueiro Rodrigues Júnior & Sérgio Henrique De Oliveira Lima & George Alberto De Freitas, 2018. "The Influence of the Characteristics of the National Business System in the Disclosure of Gender-Related Corporate Social Responsibility Practices," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Kate Grosser & Meagan Tyler, 2022. "Sexual Harassment, Sexual Violence and CSR: Radical Feminist Theory and a Human Rights Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 177(2), pages 217-232, May.
    11. Ionuț Viorel Herghiligiu & Ioan-Bogdan Robu & Marinela Istrate & Maria Grosu & Camelia Cătălina Mihalciuc & Adrian Vilcu, 2023. "Sustainable Corporate Performance Based on Audit Report Influence: An Empirical Approach through Financial Transparency and Gender Equality Dimensions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-28, September.
    12. McLaughlin, C. & Deakin. S., 2011. "Equality Law and the Limits of the 'Business Case' for addressing Gender Inequalities," Working Papers wp420, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    13. Özgü Karakulak & Thomas B. Lawrence, 2024. "Social-Symbolic Work in the Construction of Social Problems: Constructing Gender Inequality in Turkish Social Partnerships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 192(3), pages 461-486, July.
    14. Carmen‐Pilar Martí‐Ballester, 2023. "Mutual funds and gender equality in portfolio firms: Toward the sustainable development goals," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 905-926, March.
    15. Banu Ozkazanc-Pan, 2019. "CSR as Gendered Neocoloniality in the Global South," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 851-864, December.
    16. Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez & Marcelle Colares Oliveira & Jennifer Martínez‐Ferrero, 2020. "Female directors and gender issues reporting: The impact of stakeholder engagement at country level," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 369-382, January.
    17. Kate Grosser, 2016. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Multi-Stakeholder Governance: Pluralism, Feminist Perspectives and Women’s NGOs," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(1), pages 65-81, August.
    18. Deakin, S. & McLaughlin, C. & Chai, D.H., 2011. "Gender Inequality and Reflexive Law: The Potential of different regulatory Mechanisms for making Employment Rights effective," Working Papers wp426, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    19. Ahmed A. Elamer & Mounia Boulhaga, 2024. "ESG controversies and corporate performance: The moderating effect of governance mechanisms and ESG practices," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 3312-3327, July.
    20. Afsaneh Bagheri & Golshan Javadian & Pardis Zakeri & Zahra Arasti, 2024. "Bearing the Unbearable: Exploring Women Entrepreneurs Resilience Building in Times of Crises," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 193(3), pages 715-738, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:erdnra:314093. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/erdnnea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.