IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/earnsa/28748.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La certificacion como estrategia para la recuperacion de la confianza del consumidor en la adquisicion de la carne de ternera

Author

Listed:
  • Barrena Figueroa, Ramo
  • Sanchez Garcia, Mercedes
  • Gil, Jose Maria
  • Gracia, Azucena
  • Rivera, Luis M.

Abstract

Resumen El objetivo del trabajo se centra en analizar el efecto de la presencia de etiqueta en un producto con el fin de minimizar el riesgo percibido o la incertidumbre asociada al producto. El análisis ha sido realizado tomando como ejemplo la carne fresca de ternera, producto que ha presentado en Europa, en general, y en España, en particular, importantes problemas de salubridad o seguridad alimentaria que han generado una importante pérdida de confianza por parte de los consumidores e, indirectamente, una disminución de su consumo, lo que ha supuesto, a su vez, serias implicaciones sobre la oferta. Teniendo en cuenta el objetivo planteado, se especifica un modelo para analizar la disposición del consumidor a aumentar el consumo de carne de ternera si se le garantiza su salubridad. Se considera que el consumidor realiza una doble decisión: 1) consumir más o no; y 2) una vez que ha decidido incrementar su consumo, determina en qué cantidad, considerándose, adicionalmente, que ambas decisiones se adoptan de forma simultánea. Los resultados obtenidos en tres Comunidades Autónomas españolas (Comunidad de Aragón, Comunidad Foral de Navarra y Comunidad Valenciana) muestran la idoneidad de las etiquetas para mitigar los efectos que sobre la demanda tienen estos problemas surgidos en la oferta, siendo los resultados especialmente relevantes en el mercado que ha presentado mayores problemas de salubridad. Palabras Clave: comportamiento del consumidor, modelos de decisión, etiqueta, carne de ternera, seguridad alimentaria. Summary The objective of the paper is to analyse the effect of the label product presence in the reduction of the health hazard perceived or in the uncertainty associated to a product. The market selected like an example was the fresh beef, because in Europe, in general, and in Spain in particular, has been serious problems related with the food safety. These problems had influenced in the lost confidence of the consumers with important consequences in the supply. We propose a consumer decision model with two steps: 1) to consume more or no, 2) if the consumer decided to increase the consume analyse the factors which affect the quantity to increment; these decisions are considered simultaneous. The results obtained in the three Spanish regions (Comunidad de Aragón, Comunidad Foral de Navarra and Comunidad Valenciana) showed the suitability of the utilisation of the labels in the product to reduce or mitigate the demand effects of these supply complications, specially in the market which major food safety problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Barrena Figueroa, Ramo & Sanchez Garcia, Mercedes & Gil, Jose Maria & Gracia, Azucena & Rivera, Luis M., 2003. "La certificacion como estrategia para la recuperacion de la confianza del consumidor en la adquisicion de la carne de ternera," Economia Agraria y Recursos Naturales, Spanish Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 3(01), pages 1-23.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:earnsa:28748
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.28748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/28748/files/03010007.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.28748?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Scott Shonkwiler & Steven T. Yen, 1999. "Two-Step Estimation of a Censored System of Equations," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 81(4), pages 972-982.
    2. Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E. M., 1990. "Conceptual model of the quality perception process," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 309-333, December.
    3. Steenkamp, Jan-Benedict E M & van Trijp, Hans C M, 1996. "Quality Guidance: A Consumer-Based Approach to Food Quality Improvement Using Partial Least Squares," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 23(2), pages 195-215.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Barrena Figueroa, Ramo & Sanchez Garcia, Mercedes & Gracia, Azucena & Gil, Jose Maria, 2002. "Confidence in the Beef Production System as a Key Factor to Mitigate the Impact of BSE on Beef Consumption," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24873, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Juan Jose Blazquez-Resino & Santiago Gutierrez-Broncano & Pedro Jimenez-Estevez & Israel Roberto Perez-Jimenez, 2021. "The Effect of Ethnocentrism on Product Evaluation and Purchase Intention: The Case of Extra Virgin Olive Oil (EVOO)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-24, April.
    3. Babatunde Oluwasegun Alao & Andrew Bamidele Falowo & Amanda Chulayo & Voster Muchenje, 2018. "Consumers’ Preference and Factors Influencing Offal Consumption in Amathole District Eastern Cape, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
    4. Mariola Grzybowska-Brzezińska & Dominika Kuberska & Magdalena Ankiel & Agnieszka Brelik, 2020. "Consumer’s Behavior in a Multi-Attribute Concept of a Food Product," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 526-551.
    5. Brunsø, Karen & Fjord, Thomas Ahle & Grunert, Klaus G., 2002. "Consumers' food choice and quality perception," MAPP Working Papers 77, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, The MAPP Centre.
    6. Biancamaria Torquati & Tiziano Tempesta & Daniel Vecchiato & Sonia Venanzi, 2018. "Tasty or Sustainable? The Effect of Product Sensory Experience on a Sustainable New Food Product: An Application of Discrete Choice Experiments on Chianina Tinned Beef," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-24, August.
    7. Bryce, Cormac & Dowling, Michael & Lucey, Brian, 2020. "The journal quality perception gap," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(5).
    8. Abdoul G. Sam & Babatunde O. Abidoye & Sihle Mashaba, 2021. "Climate change and household welfare in sub-Saharan Africa: empirical evidence from Swaziland," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(2), pages 439-455, April.
    9. Elena Lasarte Navamuel & Fernando Rubiera Moroll & Dusan Paredes, 2014. "City size and household food consumption: demand elasticities in Spain," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(14), pages 1624-1641, May.
    10. LOFGREN Asa & MILLOCK Katrin & NAUGES Céline, 2007. "Using Ex Post Data to Estimate the Hurdle Rate of Abatement Investments - An application to the Swedish Pulp and Paper Industry and Energy Sector," LERNA Working Papers 07.06.227, LERNA, University of Toulouse.
    11. Peltner, Jonas & Thiele , Silke, 2021. "Elasticities of Food Demand in Germany – A Demand System Analysis Using Disaggregated Household Scanner Data," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 70(01), January.
    12. Tafere, Kibrom & Taffesse, Alemayehu Seyoum & Tamru, Seneshaw & Tefera, Nigussie & Paulos, Zelekawork, 2011. "Food demand elasticities in Ethiopia: Estimates using household income consumption expenditure (HICE) survey data," ESSP working papers 11, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    13. Torres, Marcelo de O. & Felthoven, Ronald G., 2014. "Productivity growth and product choice in catch share fisheries: The case of Alaska pollock," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(PA), pages 280-289.
    14. Marco Costanigro & Yuko Onozaka, 2020. "A Belief‐Preference Model of Choice for Experience and Credence Goods," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(1), pages 70-95, February.
    15. Rahbauer, S. & Staudigel, M. & Roosen, J., 2018. "Investigating German meat demand for consumer groups with different attitudes and sociodemographic characteristics," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277058, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. CARPENTIER, Alain & GOHIN, Alexandre & SCKOKAI, Paolo & THOMAS, Alban, 2015. "Economic modelling of agricultural production: past advances and new challenges," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 96(1), March.
    17. Suwen Pan & Cheng Fang & Jaime Malaga, 2006. "Alcoholic beverage consumption in China: a censored demand system approach," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(15), pages 975-979.
    18. Giuseppe Nocella & Lionel Hubbard & Riccardo Scarpa, 2010. "Farm Animal Welfare, Consumer Willingness to Pay, and Trust: Results of a Cross-National Survey," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 32(2), pages 275-297.
    19. Riccardo Magnani & Luca Piccoli & Martine Carré & Amedeo Spadaro, 2013. "Would a euro's depreciation improve the French economy?," Working Papers hal-01515823, HAL.
    20. Tan, Andrew K. G. & Yen, Steven T. & Hasan, Abdul Rahman & Muhamed, Kamarudin, 2014. "Household Expenditures on Vegetables in Malaysia," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 46(4), pages 1-19, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Consumer/Household Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:earnsa:28748. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.