IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/areint/322727.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global trends and development prospects of the market of plant protection products

Author

Listed:
  • Vdovenko, Natalia
  • Tomilin, Oleksii
  • Kovalenko, Liubov
  • Badri, Gechbaia
  • Konchakovskiy, Eugen

Abstract

Purpose. The aim of the study is to determine the prospects for the formation and development of the market for plant protection products in agriculture at the global and national levels, and to analyze the structure of pesticide use and identify countries leading in terms of use, export and import of pesticides. Methodology / approach. During the research general scientific and special research methods were used, namely: monographic (in the study of theoretical and methodological foundations of the formation and development of the market of chemical plant protection products); analysis of time series (calculation of forecast indicators and main scenarios for the development of pesticide use in the world and in Ukraine); method of comparison (assessment of pesticide use indicators); abstract-logical (theoretical generalizations and formulation of conclusions). The starting point of the study was the data of the International Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Results. Analysis of current global trends in the development of the market for chemical plant protection products has shown that it increases production every year; most of the economically developed countries of the world continue to use significant amounts of plant protection products. Studies show that the main leaders in the world market for plant protection products are Chinese agrochemical monopoly companies, which are constantly increasing sales of their own production of plant protection products for the crop industry. It is proved that the largest exporters and importers of pesticides are European countries. It is established that the use of pesticides by Ukrainian enterprises indicates their higher volatility compared to global forecasts. Ways to improve the state policy on compliance with current legislation on the use of pesticides in agricultural production and ensure the safety of their use in accordance with international quality standards and the requirements of EU, in particular the European Green Deal, are proposed. Originality / scientific novelty. It was revealed that in recent years there has been a steady trend towards the use of significant amounts of chemical plant protection products in the world, but in Ukraine they have been declining. The main reasons for the decline in pesticide use in Ukraine over the last decade are identified. For the first time, the forecast level of pesticide uses in the world and in Ukraine for the period up to 2030 was calculated according to different scenarios (expected, optimistic, pessimistic). Practical value / implications. The results of the study have important practical value for manufacturers and exporters in shaping the market for chemical products in the world. The calculations of the forecast levels of pesticide use were carried out and it was possible to identify the current and future problems of pesticide use at the level of the world. The main indicators of the world market of pesticides and the structure of their use are important, which are considerable components in determining the state policy in the field of pesticides and agrochemicals.

Suggested Citation

  • Vdovenko, Natalia & Tomilin, Oleksii & Kovalenko, Liubov & Badri, Gechbaia & Konchakovskiy, Eugen, 2022. "Global trends and development prospects of the market of plant protection products," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 8(2), June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:areint:322727
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.322727
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/322727/files/10_Vdovenko_article.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.322727?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gale, H. Frederick, Jr. & Buzby, Jean C., 2009. "Imports From China and Food Safety Issues," Economic Information Bulletin 58620, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Christos A. Damalas & Ilias G. Eleftherohorinos, 2011. "Pesticide Exposure, Safety Issues, and Risk Assessment Indicators," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Serhii Kozlovskyi & Hennadii Mazur & Nataliia Vdovenko & Tetiana Shepel & Volodymyr Kozlovskyi, 2018. "Modeling and Forecasting the Level of State Stimulation of Agricultural Production in Ukraine Based on the Theory of Fuzzy Logic," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 14(3), pages 37-53.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mingyue Li & Jingjing Wang & Kai Chen & Lianbei Wu, 2020. "Willingness and Behaviors of Farmers’ Green Disposal of Pesticide Packaging Waste in Henan, China: A Perceived Value Formation Mechanism Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Song Yang & Jincai Zhuang & Aifeng Wang & Yancai Zhang, 2019. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Chinese Food Quality considering Effort Levels," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-13, November.
    3. Ratana Sapbamrer & Jiraporn Chittrakul, 2022. "Determinants of Consumers’ Behavior in Reducing Pesticide Residues in Vegetables and Fruits, Northern Thailand," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-11, October.
    4. Gale, Fred, 2013. "Growth and Evolution in China's Agricultural Support Policies," Economic Research Report 155385, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Aqian Yan & Xiaofeng Luo & Lin Tang & Sanxia Du, 2023. "The Effect of Agricultural Extension Service Need-Supply Fit on Biological Pesticides Adoption Behavior: Evidence from Chinese Rice Farmers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, October.
    6. Ivana Doležalová & Irena Petrželová & Martin Duchoslav, 2020. "Selectivity and efficacy of herbicides dimethachlor and pethoxamid in rocket crop," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 56(4), pages 305-316.
    7. Jiri Hejkrlik & Johana Rondevaldova & Petra Chaloupkova, 2024. "Assessing Consumer Interest in Sustainable and Ethically Certified Tropical Fruits in the Central and Eastern European Region," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-28, November.
    8. Hans-Peter Hutter & Michael Poteser & Kathrin Lemmerer & Peter Wallner & Michael Kundi & Hanns Moshammer & Lisbeth Weitensfelder, 2021. "Health Symptoms Related to Pesticide Use in Farmers and Laborers of Ecological and Conventional Banana Plantations in Ecuador," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-12, January.
    9. Jespersen, Karen Sau & Kelling, Ingrid & Ponte, Stefano & Kruijssen, Froukje, 2014. "What shapes food value chains? Lessons from aquaculture in Asia," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(P1), pages 228-240.
    10. Cenwei Liu & Yi Lin & Jing Ye & Gordon W. Price & Yixiang Wang, 2023. "Effect of Bamboo Vinegar on Control of Nitrogen Loss in Vegetable Waste and Manure Composting," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Siti Khairunnisaq Rudzi & Yu Bin Ho & Eugenie Sin Sing Tan & Juliana Jalaludin & Patimah Ismail, 2022. "Exposure to Airborne Pesticides and Its Residue in Blood Serum of Paddy Farmers in Malaysia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-14, June.
    12. Morgane Bresson & Mathilde Bureau & Jérémie Le Goff & Yannick Lecluse & Elsa Robelot & Justine Delamare & Isabelle Baldi & Pierre Lebailly, 2022. "Pesticide Exposure in Fruit-Growers: Comparing Levels and Determinants Assessed under Usual Conditions of Work (CANEPA Study) with Those Predicted by Registration Process (Agricultural Operator Exposu," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-20, April.
    13. Liza Oates & Marc Cohen, 2011. "Assessing Diet as a Modifiable Risk Factor for Pesticide Exposure," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-13, May.
    14. Tetiana Vlasenko & Anatolii Hatsko & Tetiana Larina & Yevhen Hryn & Dalia Streimikiene & Tomas Balezentis, 2019. "Fuzzy Evaluation of Change Management Processes in the Context of Enterprise Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-11, November.
    15. Anders, Sven M. & Westra, Sabrina, 2012. "Barriers to Fishery Exports from Developing Countries: The Impact of U.S. FDA Food Safety Regulation," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 126912, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Ning Wang & Boshen Wang & Jinbo Wen & Xiuting Li & Liping Pan & Juan Zhang & Baoli Zhu, 2019. "Types of Exposure Pesticide Poisoning in Jiangsu Province, China; The Epidemiologic Trend between 2006 and 2018," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-8, July.
    17. Xiangyu Liu & Shasha Wang & Yuanyi Yu & Yisha Cheng & Chaoxing Hu & Min Zhou & Can Li & Bin Tang & Yan Wu, 2022. "Effects of Inhibiting the Expression of Chitin Synthase Gene SfCHSB on the Metabolism of Trehalose and Chitin in Spodoptera frugiperda Larvae," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, November.
    18. Ercan Yasar & Güray Akalin & Sinan Erdogan & Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie, 2022. "Trading Kuznets curve: empirical analysis for China," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 49(3), pages 741-768, August.
    19. Divya Chaudhry, 2024. "Pesticide Use in Indian Agriculture: Policy Alternatives for Environmental Health," Journal of Development Policy and Practice, , vol. 9(1), pages 133-161, January.
    20. Pryshliak Natalia & Tokarchuk Dina, 2020. "Socio-economic and environmental benefits of biofuel production development from agricultural waste in Ukraine," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 18-27, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:areint:322727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://are-journal.com/are .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.