IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/icafee/v3y2014p170-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socio-economic characteristics and resource of agriculture of the region

Author

Listed:
  • Mersida Jandric

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Zoran Rajic

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Sreten Jelic

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Dragic Tivkovic

    (Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

The subject of the research is the analysis of the socio-economic indicators and the state of agriculture in the region which is located in the south-western part of Serbia. The main characteristics of the region are: large number of young-age population, great migrations from rural to city areas and exceptional natural conditions for the development of cattle breeding. In short, the subject of the case study is the analysis of the basic socio-economic indicators (receiving of the full, selective, and comparable data), with special emphasis on the importance of agriculture and processing capacities for rural development in this part of Serbia. What needs to be pointed out is the importance of revitalization of agriculture and rural areas, given the fact that that it is economically the underdeveloped area. The observed region is economically one of the most underdeveloped regions in Serbia. For decades this region is seen as "traditionally" undeveloped area. The basic characteristics of this group are the decades-long underdevelopment, as well as the appearance of a new transitional poverty. The region is faced with accumulated economic (no industrial capacity, the collapse of large systems, undeveloped entrepreneurship, slow privatization process), structural (high rate of unemployment), social and demographic problems of the region. Socio-economic features and agricultural resources represent a significant potential for the development of agriculture and industry in the region and beyond. The aim of the study was to realize the internal strengths and weaknesses, as well as the external opportunities and threats for the agricultural development of this region and also to include critical analysis of the most important aspects of the system of existing institutions as well as performing of its business. Conducted analysis can be used for making of major strategic decisions in order to improve agricultural production in the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Mersida Jandric & Zoran Rajic & Sreten Jelic & Dragic Tivkovic, 2014. "Socio-economic characteristics and resource of agriculture of the region," International Conference on Competitiveness of Agro-food and Environmental Economy Proceedings, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 3, pages 170-178.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:icafee:v:3:y:2014:p:170-178
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cafee.ase.ro/wp-content/upload/2014edition/file2014(19).pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dyson, Robert G., 2004. "Strategic development and SWOT analysis at the University of Warwick," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(3), pages 631-640, February.
    2. Arnold, J. E. Michael & Perez, M. Ruiz, 2001. "Can non-timber forest products match tropical forest conservation and development objectives?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 437-447, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Chengjiang & Negnevitsky, Michael & Wang, Xiaolin, 2020. "Prospective assessment of methanol vehicles in China using FANP-SWOT analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 60-75.
    2. Claudio O. Delang, 2006. "The role of wild food plants in poverty alleviation and biodiversity conservation in tropical countries," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 6(4), pages 275-286, October.
    3. Ishtiyak Ahmad Peerzada & Mohammad A. Islam & James Chamberlain & Shalini Dhyani & Mohan Reddy & Somidh Saha, 2022. "Potential of NTFP Based Bioeconomy in Livelihood Security and Income Inequality Mitigation in Kashmir Himalayas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, February.
    4. Jitendar Kumar Khatri & Bhimaraya Metri, 2016. "SWOT-AHP Approach for Sustainable Manufacturing Strategy Selection: A Case of Indian SME," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(5), pages 1211-1226, October.
    5. Mingers, John, 2015. "Helping business schools engage with real problems: The contribution of critical realism and systems thinking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 316-331.
    6. Dimitris Terzakis & Pandelis Zisis & Alexandros Garefalakis & Stavros Arvanitis, 2012. "Translating the Service Quality Gaps into Strategy Formulation. An Experimental Case Study of a Greek Academic Department," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 99-126.
    7. Claudio Baudino & Nicole Roberta Giuggioli & Rossella Briano & Stefano Massaglia & Cristiana Peano, 2017. "Integrated Methodologies (SWOT, TOWS, LCA) for Improving Production Chains and Environmental Sustainability of Kiwifruit and Baby Kiwi in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Fernando Morante-Carballo & Bethy Merchán-Sanmartín & Allen Cárdenas-Cruz & Maria Jaya-Montalvo & Josep Mata-Perelló & Gricelda Herrera-Franco & Paúl Carrión-Mero, 2022. "Sites of Geological Interest Assessment for Geoeducation Strategies, ESPOL University Campus, Guayaquil, Ecuador," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, May.
    9. R Ormerod, 2006. "The OR/MS contribution to strategy development and policy-making," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(1), pages 117-120, January.
    10. Brobbey, Lawrence Kwabena & Hansen, Christian Pilegaard & Kyereh, Boateng & Pouliot, Mariéve, 2019. "The economic importance of charcoal to rural livelihoods: Evidence from a key charcoal-producing area in Ghana," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 19-31.
    11. Heubach, Katja & Wittig, Rüdiger & Nuppenau, Ernst-August & Hahn, Karen, 2011. "The economic importance of non-timber forest products (NTFPs) for livelihood maintenance of rural west African communities: A case study from northern Benin," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(11), pages 1991-2001, September.
    12. Mwazvita T. B. Dalu & Ashley W. Gunter & Mulweli Makatu & Gregory M. Dowo & Farai Dondofema & Tatenda Dalu, 2021. "Contribution of Natural Forest Products to Rural Livelihoods at Mavunde and Sambandou Villages, Vhembe Biosphere Reserve, South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-11, April.
    13. Shreya Bhattacharya & Basanta Kumar Das & Aparna Roy & Prateep Kumar Nayak & Avishek Saha & Pranaya Kumar Parida & Lianthuamluaia Lianthuamluaia & Kausik Mondal & Sangeeta Chakraborty, 2024. "Socio-Economic Profile and Vulnerabilities Assessment in Small-Scale Fisheries of Lower Gangetic Flood Plain Wetland: An Initiative Towards Achieving Wetland Ecosystem Sustainability and Community Wel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-22, November.
    14. Barak, Sasan & Javanmard, Shima, 2020. "Outsourcing modelling using a novel interval-valued fuzzy quantitative strategic planning matrix (QSPM) and multiple criteria decision-making (MCDMs)," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    15. Massimo Giovanardi & Maria Giulia Silvagni & Francesco Maria Barbini, 2023. "The SWOT of Damocles: challenges in shaping inclusive place marketing audits," Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 294-304, September.
    16. Wu, Jie & Zhao, Narisa & Yang, Tong, 2024. "Wisdom of crowds: SWOT analysis based on hybrid text mining methods using online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    17. Simen Pedersen & Kristin E. Gangås & Madhu Chetri & Harry P. Andreassen, 2020. "Economic Gain vs. Ecological Pain—Environmental Sustainability in Economies Based on Renewable Biological Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, April.
    18. Lopez-Feldman, Alejandro, 2005. "Panel Data Evidence on the Determinants of Non-Timber Forest Products Extraction: The Case of Xate in Mexico," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19410, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Matias, Denise Margaret S. & Tambo, Justice A. & Stellmacher, Till & Borgemeister, Christian & von Wehrden, Henrik, 2018. "Commercializing traditional non-timber forest products: An integrated value chain analysis of honey from giant honey bees in Palawan, Philippines," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 223-231.
    20. Baumgartner, Philipp & von Braun, Joachim & Abebaw, Degnet & Müller, Marc, 2015. "Impacts of Large-scale Land Investments on Income, Prices, and Employment: Empirical Analyses in Ethiopia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 175-190.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:icafee:v:3:y:2014:p:170-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Elena Preda (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.