IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aem/wpaper/y2019i11p6-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact Of Hedonic And Utilitarian Shopping Motive On Online Purchase Decision

Author

Listed:
  • DR.A.VARADARAJ
  • Mrs.D.CHARUMATHI

Abstract

The change in technological area all over the world has changed the concept of information and communication. The use of internet for commercial purposes gave rise to the existence of the electronic commerce (e-commerce) phenomenon. Online shopping or e-shopping is a form of electronic commerce which allows consumers to directly buy goods or services from a seller over the Internet using a web browser. The study focuses on the impact of hedonic and utilitarian motives on the consumers buying behaviour towards online shopping. Questionnaire was used to collect the primary data. The sample size of the study was 125 and the sample design adopted was convenience sampling. This paper tried to find out the impact of hedonic and utilitarian motive on the consumer buying behaviour towards online shopping and gives suggestions to improve the same.

Suggested Citation

  • DR.A.VARADARAJ & Mrs.D.CHARUMATHI, 2019. "Impact Of Hedonic And Utilitarian Shopping Motive On Online Purchase Decision," CSIE Working Papers, Center for Studies in European Integration (CSEI), Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova (ASEM), issue 11, pages 6-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:aem:wpaper:y:2019:i:11:p:6-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://csei.ase.md/wp/files/issue11/WP_ISSUE_11_VAR.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rajagopal, 2015. "Consumer Value Management," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: The Butterfly Effect in Competitive Markets, chapter 5, pages 119-143, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Nicky J. Welton & Howard H. Z. Thom, 2015. "Value of Information," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 35(5), pages 564-566, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leila Meratian Esfahani & Lester W. Johnson, 2018. "Stakeholders’ Engagement and Strategic Management of Social Media," Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 3(6), pages 47-56, September.
    2. Wen-Chin Tsao & Yuan-Wei Shao, 2018. "How Is Flow Induced? From the Perspective of Online and Offline Channels," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1), pages 11-28, March.
    3. Raluca Daniela RIZEA, 2015. "Growth Strategies Of Multinational Companies Study Case: Precious Metals Jewelry Retail Industry," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 7, pages 497-502, April.
    4. Sarasvuo, Sonja & Rindell, Anne & Kovalchuk, Marina, 2022. "Toward a conceptual understanding of co-creation in branding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 543-563.
    5. Zhou, Xiongyong & Xu, Zhiduan, 2022. "Traceability in food supply chains: a systematic literature review and future research directions," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 25(2), March.
    6. Lama Zalloum & Hamad Alghadeer & Nawras Nusairat, 2019. "The Effect of Using Mobile Banking Services Applications on Electronic Word of Mouth: The Mediating Role of Perceived Trust," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(9), pages 62-80, September.
    7. Vincenzo Varriale & Antonello Cammarano & Francesca Michelino & Mauro Caputo, 2021. "Sustainable Supply Chains with Blockchain, IoT and RFID: A Simulation on Order Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, June.
    8. Christoph Engel, 2016. "Experimental Criminal Law. A Survey of Contributions from Law, Economics and Criminology," Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2016_07, Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    9. Valeria Costantini & Francesco Crespi & Giovanni Marin & Elena Paglialunga, 2016. "Eco-innovation, sustainable supply chains and environmental performance in European industries," LEM Papers Series 2016/19, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    10. Lee, Alice J. & Ames, Daniel R., 2017. "“I can’t pay more” versus “It’s not worth more”: Divergent effects of constraint and disparagement rationales in negotiations," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 16-28.
    11. Hussain, Hadia & Murtaza, Murtaza & Ajmal, Areeb & Ahmed, Afreen & Khan, Muhammad Ovais Khalid, 2020. "A study on the effects of social media advertisement on consumer’s attitude and customer response," MPRA Paper 104675, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Jacopo Bizzotto & Alessandro De Chiara, 2022. "Frequent audits and honest audits," Working Papers 202202, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo Business School.
    13. A. G. Fatullayev & Nizami A. Gasilov & Şahin Emrah Amrahov, 2019. "Numerical solution of linear inhomogeneous fuzzy delay differential equations," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 315-326, September.
    14. Majumdar, Adrija & Bose, Indranil, 2019. "Do tweets create value? A multi-period analysis of Twitter use and content of tweets for manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 1-11.
    15. Cyril Chalendard, 2015. "Use of internal information, external information acquisition and customs underreporting," Working Papers halshs-01179445, HAL.
    16. Arun Advani & William Elming & Jonathan Shaw, 2023. "The Dynamic Effects of Tax Audits," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 105(3), pages 545-561, May.
    17. Burke, Qing L. & Wieland, Matthew M., 2017. "Value relevance of banks' cash flows from operations," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 60-78.
    18. Philippe Aghion & Ufuk Akcigit & Matthieu Lequien & Stefanie Stantcheva, 2017. "Tax simplicity and heterogeneous learning," CEP Discussion Papers dp1516, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    19. Steiner, B.E. & Peschel, A.O. & Grebitus, C., 2017. "Multi-Product Category Choices Labeled for Ecological Footprints: Exploring Psychographics and Evolved Psychological Biases for Characterizing Latent Consumer Classes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 251-264.
    20. Peter Easton & Xiao-Jun Zhang, 2017. "Mixing fair-value and historical-cost accounting: predictable other-comprehensive-income and mispricing of bank stocks," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1732-1760, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aem:wpaper:y:2019:i:11:p:6-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Rodica CRUDU (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/acecsmd.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.