IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v24y2020i51399.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Anthropocene and “Development”: Intertwined Trajectories Since the Beginning of The Great Acceleration

Author

Listed:
  • Marina Dantas de Figueiredo
  • Fábio Freitas Schilling Marquesan
  • José Miguel Imas

Abstract

Objectives: We aim to propose the thesis that the trajectories of the Anthropocene and the current mainstream understandings of development are intertwined from the beginning. It means that the Anthropocene and the “development” are coetaneous: the implementation of development policies for the so-considered underdeveloped regions started to happen at the same time of what is known as The Great Acceleration of production, consumption and environmental degradation in a global level. Method: In this conceptual paper, we adopt a decolonial critique as an analytical lens and argue that different geopolitical positions may be necessary for approaching the issue of the Anthropocene from epistemological reflections that can include the cultural and political context of the production and reproduction of local knowledge. Results: Our theoretical argumentation sheds light on the role of Global North and South relations in shaping the environmental crisis. Latin America (LA) exemplifies the modus operandi of the intertwinement of the practical effects of development policies and the environmental consequences underlying the Anthropocene, in which natural resources are over-explored to satisfy export-oriented trade, from the South toward the North. LA is not only a propitious context to show the validity of our thesis, but also the source of alternatives to such developmental model. Conclusion: The emphasis on development as a cause of the Anthropocene supports The Great Acceleration thesis. The proposition of the name Developmentocene comes from the thesis that development and Anthropocene are coetaneous, the intertwinement of both resulting in the very definition of the new epoch.

Suggested Citation

  • Marina Dantas de Figueiredo & Fábio Freitas Schilling Marquesan & José Miguel Imas, 2020. "Anthropocene and “Development”: Intertwined Trajectories Since the Beginning of The Great Acceleration," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 24(5), pages 400-413.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:24:y:2020:i:5:1399
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1399
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/1399
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seray Ergene & Marta B. Calás & Linda Smircich, 2018. "Ecologies of Sustainable Concerns: Organization Theorizing for the Anthropocene," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 222-245, May.
    2. Rist, Gilbert, 2019. "The History of Development," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 5, number 9781786997555, Febrero.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wendelin M. Küpers, 2020. "From the Anthropocene to an ‘Ecocene’ ―Eco-Phenomenological Perspectives on Embodied, Anthrodecentric Transformations towards Enlivening Practices of Organising Sustainably," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Katherine Ravenswood, 2022. "Greening work–life balance: Connecting work, caring and the environment," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 3-18, January.
    3. Teea Kortetmäki & Anna Heikkinen & Ari Jokinen, 2023. "Particularizing Nonhuman Nature in Stakeholder Theory: The Recognition Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(1), pages 17-31, June.
    4. Kirsten Locke & Rebecca W. B. Lund & Susan Wright, 2021. "Rethinking gender equity in the contaminated university: A methodology for listening for music in the ruins," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 1079-1097, May.
    5. Charles Barthold & Peter Bloom, 2020. "Denaturalizing the Environment: Dissensus and the Possibility of Radically Democratizing Discourses of Environmental Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(4), pages 671-681, July.
    6. Cheng Jin & Asif Razzaq & Faiza Saleem & Avik Sinha, 2022. "Asymmetric effects of eco-innovation and human capital development in realizing environmental sustainability in China: evidence from quantile ARDL framework," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 4947-4970, December.
    7. Seray Ergene & Subhabrata Bobby Banerjee & Erim Ergene, 2024. "Environmental Racism and Climate (In)Justice in the Anthropocene: Addressing the Silences and Erasures in Management and Organization Studies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 193(4), pages 785-800, September.
    8. Christian Garmann Johnsen, 2021. "Sustainability Beyond Instrumentality: Towards an Immanent Ethics of Organizational Environmentalism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 1-14, August.
    9. Julia Eder, 2021. "Decreasing Dependency through Self-Reliance: Strengthening Local Economies through Community Wealth Building," ICAE Working Papers 124, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.
    10. Jonathan R. Barton & Felipe Gutiérrez-Antinopai & Miguel Escalona Ulloa, 2021. "Adaptive Capacity as Local Sustainable Development: Contextualizing and Comparing Risks and Resilience in Two Chilean Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-32, April.
    11. Amélie Gabriagues & Séverine Besson & Lionel Garreau, 2024. "Reimagining the Learning Organization: Unveiling the Untapped Potential of a Fundamentally Systemic Approach," Post-Print hal-04654112, HAL.
    12. Charles Barthold & David Bevan & Hervé Corvellec, 2022. "An ecofeminist position in critical practice: Challenging corporate truth in the Anthropocene," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 1796-1814, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:24:y:2020:i:5:1399. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.