IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v29y2022i6p1796-1814.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An ecofeminist position in critical practice: Challenging corporate truth in the Anthropocene

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Barthold
  • David Bevan
  • Hervé Corvellec

Abstract

Drawing on selected discourses of non‐essentialist ecofeminism, this article proposes and substantiates an ecofeminist position. This distinct position is shown to bring with it a capacity to challenge widely uncontested, corporate‐produced truths regarding the benefits and the legitimacy of certain commercial activities. Three historical cases inform the discussion: the fights led by Rachel Carson against dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane, by Erin Brockovich against hexavalent chromium, and by Vandana Shiva against genetically modified organisms. Distinguishing characteristics of this emblematically individual and critical activist practice include that it is aimed at fighting environmental degradations; it originates from outrage; it is sustained by dedication and courage; and it combines pedagogy, politics, and ethics. We show how this practice may be understood by reference to acknowledged ecofeminist tenets and in particular with the advocating of a holistic, respectful association with all forms of life on Earth. This is in stark contradistinction to dualist, corporate positions of self‐interested detachment from the environment, and a corresponding denial of the entanglement of the social and physical worlds. We show how such an ecofeminist position has been capable of disrupting both established corporate truths and the discursive power relationships attached to them; and how it engenders an imperative that corporations must confront and engage with the deliberate, anthropogenic consequences of their activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Barthold & David Bevan & Hervé Corvellec, 2022. "An ecofeminist position in critical practice: Challenging corporate truth in the Anthropocene," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 1796-1814, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:29:y:2022:i:6:p:1796-1814
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12878
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12878
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12878?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seray Ergene & Marta B. Calás & Linda Smircich, 2018. "Ecologies of Sustainable Concerns: Organization Theorizing for the Anthropocene," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 222-245, May.
    2. Wright,Christopher & Nyberg,Daniel, 2015. "Climate Change, Capitalism, and Corporations," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107435131, September.
    3. Wright,Christopher & Nyberg,Daniel, 2015. "Climate Change, Capitalism, and Corporations," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107078222, September.
    4. Olivia Davies & Kathleen Riach, 2019. "From manstream measuring to multispecies sustainability? A gendered reading of bee‐ing sustainable," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 246-266, April.
    5. Sonja Gallhofer, 2018. "Going beyond western dualism: towards corporate nature responsibility reporting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(8), pages 2110-2134, July.
    6. Mary Phillips, 2019. "“Daring to Care”: Challenging Corporate Environmentalism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(4), pages 1151-1164, June.
    7. Charles Barthold & Peter Bloom, 2020. "Denaturalizing the Environment: Dissensus and the Possibility of Radically Democratizing Discourses of Environmental Sustainability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(4), pages 671-681, July.
    8. Mary Phillips & Alice Willatt, 2020. "Embodiment, care and practice in a community kitchen," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(2), pages 198-217, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Teea Kortetmäki & Anna Heikkinen & Ari Jokinen, 2023. "Particularizing Nonhuman Nature in Stakeholder Theory: The Recognition Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(1), pages 17-31, June.
    2. Matthijs Bal & Andy Brookes, 2022. "How Sustainable Is Human Resource Management Really? An Argument for Radical Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Rajat Panwar & Jonatan Pinkse & Benjamin Cashore & Bryan W. Husted, 2023. "Why corporate sustainability initiatives fail to reduce deforestation and what to do about it," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5121-5127, December.
    4. Charlotte Demonsant & Kevin Levillain & Blanche Segrestin, 2022. "Questioning the logic of collective climate action: framing the climate action situation and the model of "Common rescue"," Post-Print hal-03722106, HAL.
    5. Michael Quinlan, 2020. "Five challenges to humanity: Learning from pattern/repeat failures in past disasters?," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 31(3), pages 444-466, September.
    6. David Krogmann, 2024. "Here to stay? Challenges to liberal environmentalism in regional climate governance," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(2), pages 288-300, May.
    7. Glover, Jane & Touboulic, Anne, 2020. "Tales from the countryside: Unpacking “passing the environmental buck” as hypocritical practice in the food supply chain," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 33-46.
    8. Ryan Gunderson & Brian Petersen & Diana Stuart, 2018. "A Critical Examination of Geoengineering: Economic and Technological Rationality in Social Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, January.
    9. David Coen & Kyle Herman & Tom Pegram, 2022. "Are corporate climate efforts genuine? An empirical analysis of the climate ‘talk–walk’ hypothesis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3040-3059, November.
    10. Katherine Ravenswood, 2022. "Greening work–life balance: Connecting work, caring and the environment," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 3-18, January.
    11. Anahid Roux-Rosier & Ricardo Azambuja & Gazi Islam, 2018. "Alternative visions : permaculture as imaginaries of the anthropocene," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) halshs-01958956, HAL.
    12. Belinda Wade & Andrew Griffiths, 2022. "Exploring the Cognitive Foundations of Managerial (Climate) Change Decisions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 15-40, November.
    13. Michal Carrington & Detlev Zwick & Benjamin Neville, 2019. "Activism and Abdication on the Inside: The Effect of Everyday Practice on Corporate Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 973-999, December.
    14. Ellie Norris & Shawgat Kutubi & Steven Greenland, 2022. "Accounting and First Nations: A Systematic Literature Review and Directions for Future Research," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(2), pages 156-180, June.
    15. Anahid Roux-Rosier & Ricardo Azambuja & Gazi Islam, 2018. "Alternative visions : permaculture as imaginaries of the anthropocene," Post-Print halshs-01958956, HAL.
    16. Patrick Elf & Andrea Werner & Sandy Black, 2022. "Advancing the circular economy through dynamic capabilities and extended customer engagement: Insights from small sustainable fashion enterprises in the UK," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(6), pages 2682-2699, September.
    17. Barbara Kump, 2021. "When do threats mobilize managers for organizational change toward sustainability? An environmental belief model," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2713-2726, July.
    18. Carlos R. S. Milani & Leonildes Nazar Chaves, 2022. "How and why European and Chinese pro-climate leadership may be challenged by their strategic economic interests in Brazil," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 403-422, December.
    19. Nyberg, Daniel & Murray, John, 2023. "Corporate populism: How corporations construct and represent ‘the people’ in political contestations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    20. Kay Junge & Kirill Postoutenko, 2021. "Redundancy, Noisy Signaling, and Semantic inflation: Studying the Patterns of Self‐Destruction in Complex Systems," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 902-910, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:29:y:2022:i:6:p:1796-1814. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.