IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aag/wpaper/v25y2021i3p26-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Moderating Role of Gender in the Relationship between Ethics and Negotiation Style

Author

Listed:
  • Massoud Moslehpour

    (Department of Business Administration, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan)

  • Mein-Woei Suen

    (Department of Psychology, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan)

  • Yu-Te Tu

    (Department of Business Administration, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan)

  • Ranfeng Qiu

    (Department of Management California State University, San Bernardino, California, USA)

Abstract

"Purpose: This study explores three dimensions of how gender and ethics may affect negotiation styles and measures the relationship between gender and ethics. Design/methodology/approach: This study applied Structural Equations Modelling that focused on the GreTai Security Market to test the effects and differences of gender on negotiation styles. Findings: The results revealed that gender and ethics significantly affect negotiation styles, and gender significantly affects ethical behaviors. Originality/value: Current transactions are more complex than they were ever before. Information is asymmetric, and expectations differ between the sides. Therefore, an effective negotiation becomes quite crucial to reaching a win-win result. Different countries have different cultural environments; hence numerous different negotiations styles which merit further studies. However, most prior studies in the field are focused on a single factor used to measure another variable that may not consistently capture how gender and ethics affect negotiation styles and the relationships between gender and ethics Implications: This study helps multicultural negotiators and companies find the most competent design for improving the efficiency of negotiations in business and other endeavors. Educators and curriculum designers should consider cultural issues as an integral part of their curriculum in their future designs."

Suggested Citation

  • Massoud Moslehpour & Mein-Woei Suen & Yu-Te Tu & Ranfeng Qiu, 2021. "The Moderating Role of Gender in the Relationship between Ethics and Negotiation Style," Advances in Decision Sciences, Asia University, Taiwan, vol. 25(3), pages 26-45, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:aag:wpaper:v:25:y:2021:i:3:p:26-45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iads.site/The-Moderating-Role-of-Gender-in-the-Relationship-between-Ethics-and-Negotiation-Style
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steffen Andersen & Julie Marx & Kasper Meisner Nielsen & Lise Vesterlund, 2021. "Gender Differences in Negotiation: Evidence from Real Estate Transactions," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 131(638), pages 2304-2332.
    2. Cramton, Peter C. & Dees, J. Gregory, 1993. "Promoting Honesty in Negotiation: An Exercise in Practical Ethics," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(4), pages 359-394, October.
    3. Alsaad, Abdallah Khalaf, 2021. "Ethical judgment, subjective norms, and ethical consumption: The moderating role of moral certainty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William N Goetzmann & Christophe Spaenjers & Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh, 2021. "Real and Private-Value Assets [Gendered prices]," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 34(8), pages 3497-3526.
    2. Kiessling, Lukas & Pinger, Pia & Seegers, Philipp & Bergerhoff, Jan, 2024. "Gender differences in wage expectations and negotiation," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    3. Carlsson, Fredrik & Kataria, Mitesh & Lampi, Elina, 2024. "Sexual objectification of women in media and the gender wage gap: Does exposure to objectifying pictures lower the reservation wage?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    4. Paul Goldsmith‐Pinkham & Kelly Shue, 2023. "The Gender Gap in Housing Returns," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 78(2), pages 1097-1145, April.
    5. Mainardes, Emerson Wagner & Coutinho, Ananda Raquel Silva & Alves, Helena Maria Batista, 2023. "The influence of the ethics of E-retailers on online customer experience and customer satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    6. Khan, Sarah & Abbas, Muhammad, 2023. "Interactive effects of consumers’ ethical beliefs and authenticity on ethical consumption and pro-environmental behaviors," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    7. Daniela Šálková & Inna Čábelková & Dita Hommerová, 2024. "Ethical Consumption: What Makes People Buy "Ethical" Products," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2024(2), pages 27-52.
    8. SimanTov-Nachlieli, Ilanit & Har-Vardi, Liron & Moran, Simone, 2020. "When negotiators with honest reputations are less (and more) likely to be deceived," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 68-84.
    9. Shelly Lundberg, 2023. "Gender Economics: Dead-Ends and New Opportunities," Research in Labor Economics, in: 50th Celebratory Volume, volume 50, pages 151-189, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    10. Dragana Cvijanović & Christophe Spaenjers, 2021. "“We’ll Always Have Paris”: Out-of-Country Buyers in the Housing Market," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(7), pages 4120-4138, July.
    11. Saleh Md Arman & Cecilia Mark-Herbert, 2022. "Ethical Pro-Environmental Self-Identity Practice: The Case of Second-Hand Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    12. Popov, Alexander, 2022. "The division of spoils in a booming industry," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 341-369.
    13. Md. Moddassir Alam & Abdalwali Lutfi & Abdallah Alsaad, 2023. "Antecedents and Consequences of Customers’ Engagement with Pro-Environmental Consumption-Related Content on Social Media," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Chae, Myoung-Jin & Kim, Yanghee & Roh, Taewoo, 2024. "Consumers’ attention, experience, and action to organic consumption: The moderating role of anticipated pride and moral obligation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    15. Shang, Dawei & Wu, Weiwei, 2022. "Does green morality lead to collaborative consumption behavior toward online collaborative redistribution platforms? Evidence from emerging markets shows the asymmetric roles of pro-environmental self," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    16. Al-Khatib, Jamal A. & Malshe, Avinash & AbdulKader, Mazen, 2008. "Perception of unethical negotiation tactics: A comparative study of US and Saudi managers," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 78-102, February.
    17. Shi Ruo-Fei & Jing-Yun Zeng & Chang-Hyun Jin, 2022. "The Role of Consumer’ Social Capital on Ethical Consumption and Consumer Happiness," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    18. Mario Arias-Oliva & Jorge Pelegrín-Borondo & Ala Ali Almahameed & Jorge de Andrés-Sánchez, 2021. "Ethical Attitudes toward COVID-19 Passports: Evidences from Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-18, December.
    19. Jason R. Pierce & Leigh Thompson, 2022. "Feeling Competitiveness or Empathy Towards Negotiation Counterparts Mitigates Sex Differences in Lying," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(1), pages 71-87, June.
    20. Takumi Kato & Katsuya Hayami & Kenta Kasahara & Minami Morino & Yui Ikuma & Ryosuke Ikeda & Masaki Koizumi, 2023. "Environmental vs. labor issues: evidence of influence on intention to purchase ethical coffee in Japan," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ethics; gender; negotiation; NSP-12;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F22 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Migration
    • F23 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - Multinational Firms; International Business
    • F51 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Conflicts; Negotiations; Sanctions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aag:wpaper:v:25:y:2021:i:3:p:26-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vincent Pan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dfasitw.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.