IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/r/wbk/wbrwps/3819.html
   My bibliography  Save this item

Lobbying and agricultural trade policy in the United States

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as


Cited by:

  1. John Gilbert & Reza Oladi, 2012. "Net campaign contributions, agricultural interests, and votes on liberalizing trade with China," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 745-769, March.
  2. Lyu, Jianxing & Prehn, Soren & Zhang, Yanjie & Glauben, Thomas & Zeng, Yinchu, 2021. "Trade creation, political sensitivity and product exclusions: the political economy of agriculture protection in China’s FTAs," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(03), January.
  3. Bellemare, Marc F. & Carnes, Nicholas, 2015. "Why do members of congress support agricultural protection?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 20-34.
  4. Kristy Buzard, 2017. "Trade Agreements in the Shadow of Lobbying," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 21-43, February.
  5. Kym Anderson & Gordon Rausser & Johan Swinnen, 2013. "Political Economy of Public Policies: Insights from Distortions to Agricultural and Food Markets," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 51(2), pages 423-477, June.
  6. Dutt, Pushan & Mitra, Devashish, 2009. "Explaining Agricultural Distortion Patterns : The Roles of Ideology, Inequality, Lobbying and Public Finance," Agricultural Distortions Working Paper Series 50299, World Bank.
  7. Craig VanGrasstek VanGrasstek, 2017. "Washington Slept Here: How Donald Trump Caught the Politicians Napping on Trade," RSCAS Working Papers 2017/02, European University Institute.
  8. Russell, Levi, 2018. "Ideology, Electoral Incentives, PAC Contributions, and the Agricultural Act of 2014," Working Papers 06978, George Mason University, Mercatus Center.
  9. Clas Eriksson, 2011. "Home bias in preferences and the political economics of agricultural protection," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 92(1), pages 5-23.
  10. Tyutin, Anton & Zaporozhets, Vera, 2017. "On Legislative Lobbying under Political Uncertainty," TSE Working Papers 17-807, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
  11. Olper, Alessandro, 2017. "The political economy of trade-related regulatory policy: environment and global value chain," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 5(3), February.
  12. Ingo Rohlfing & Tobias Schafföner, 2019. "The time-varying relationship between economic globalization and the ideological center of gravity of party systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(2), pages 1-26, February.
  13. Freshwater, David & Leising, Jordan D., 2015. "Why Farm Support Persists: An Explanation Grounded in Congressional Political Economy," Staff Papers 198782, University of Kentucky, Department of Agricultural Economics.
  14. Eriksson, Clas, 2011. "Home bias in preferences and the political economics of agricultural protection," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement (RAEStud), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), vol. 92(1).
  15. repec:hal:wpspec:info:hdl:2441/7o52iohb7k6srk09n20k7c4r6 is not listed on IDEAS
  16. Zahrnt, Valentin, 2008. "Domestic constituents and the formulation of WTO negotiating positions: what the delegates say," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 393-421, April.
  17. Moon, Wanki & Sakuyama, Takumi, 2021. "The Political Economy of Agricultural Trade Policy in Northeast Asia: Comparisons with the West and between Japan and Korea," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315192, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
  18. Olivier Bos & Béatrice Roussillon & Paul Schweinzer, 2016. "Agreeing on Efficient Emissions Reduction," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 118(4), pages 785-815, October.
  19. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/7o52iohb7k6srk09n20k7c4r6 is not listed on IDEAS
  20. Freshwater, David & Leising, Jordan, 2015. "Why farm support Persists: An Explanation Grounded in Congressional political Economy," 2015 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2015, Atlanta, Georgia 196794, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
  21. Kym Anderson, 2016. "Agricultural Trade, Policy Reforms, and Global Food Security," Palgrave Studies in Agricultural Economics and Food Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-137-46925-0, November.
  22. Doron Nisani, 2018. "Efficient indirect regulation under Protection for Sale," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 54(1), pages 41-52, August.
  23. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/7o52iohb7k6srk09n20k7c4r6 is not listed on IDEAS
  24. Marie-Agnès Jouanjean, 2012. "Market access & food standards insights from the implementation of US sanitary and phytosanitary regulation [Accès au marché et standards alimentaires : enseignements de la mise en œuvre de la régl," SciencePo Working papers Main tel-03676119, HAL.
  25. Alexander Brumm & Kensuke Fukushi, 2024. "Introducing the Food Value Framework (FVF) to empower transdisciplinary research and unite stakeholders in their efforts of building a sustainable global food system," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 25921-25943, October.
  26. Wenshou Yan & Kaixing Huang, 2018. "Determinants of agricultural protection in China and the rest of the world," Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, The Crawford School, The Australian National University, vol. 32(2), pages 64-75, November.
  27. Lopez, Rigoberto A. & He, Xi & De Falcis, Eleonora, 2017. "What Drives China’s New Agricultural Subsidies?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 279-292.
  28. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/7o52iohb7k6srk09n20k7c4r6 is not listed on IDEAS
IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.