Utilitarianism, Egalitarianism, and the Timing Effect in Social Choice Problems

Citations

Cited by:

1. McCarthy, David & Mikkola, Kalle & Thomas, Teruji, 2020. "Utilitarianism with and without expected utility," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 77-113.
   • McCarthy, David & Mikkola, Kalle & Thomas, Teruji, 2016. "Utilitarianism with and without expected utility," MPRA Paper 72578, University Library of Munich, Germany.
2. Wan, Long & Ding, Zhihao & Li, Yunpeng & Chen, Qianqian & Tan, Zhiyi, 2015. "Scheduling to minimize the maximum total completion time per machine," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(1), pages 45-50.
3. Ok, Efe A. & Zhou, Lin, 2000. "The Choquet Bargaining Solutions," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 249-264, November.
   • Ok, Efe A. & Zhou, Lin, 1997. "The Choquet Bargaining Solutions," Working Papers 97-36, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University.
4. Gajdos, Thibault & Maurin, Eric, 2004. "Unequal uncertainties and uncertain inequalities: an axiomatic approach," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 93-118, May.
   • Thibault Gajdos & Eric Maurin, 2002. "Unequal uncertainties and uncertain inequalities: an axiomatic approach," ICER Working Papers - Applied Mathematics Series 15-2003, ICER - International Centre for Economic Research, revised Mar 2003.
   • Thibault Gajdos & Eric Maurin, 2004. "Unequal Uncertainties and Uncertain Inequalities: An Axiomatic Approach," Post-Print halshs-00085940, HAL.
   • Thibault Gajdos & Eric Maurin, 2004. "Unequal Uncertainties and Uncertain Inequalities: An Axiomatic Approach," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00085940, HAL.
   • Thibault Gadjos & Eric Maurin, 2002. "Unequal Uncertainties and Uncertain Inequalities : An Axiomatic Approach," Working Papers 2002-32, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
5. Ismail Saglam, 2014. "A Simple Axiomatization Of The Egalitarian Solution," International Game Theory Review (IGTR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(04), pages 1-7.
   • Ismail Saglam, 2012. "A Simple Axiomatization of the Egalitarian Solution," Working Papers 1201, TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Department of Economics.
   • Saglam, Ismail, 2012. "A simple axiomatization of the egalitarian solution," MPRA Paper 36773, University Library of Munich, Germany.
6. Jerry Green, 2005. "Compensatory transfers in two-player decision problems," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 33(2), pages 159-180, June.
   • Green, Jerry, 2005. "Compensatory Transfers in Two-Player Decision Problems," Scholarly Articles 3204680, Harvard University Department of Economics.
7. Zuber, Stéphane, 2016. "Harsanyi’s theorem without the sure-thing principle: On the consistent aggregation of Monotonic Bernoullian and Archimedean preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 78-83.
   • Stéphane Zuber, 2015. "Harsanyi's theorem without the sure-thing principle: On the consistent aggregation of Monotonic Bernoullian and Archimedean preferences," Post-Print halshs-01224145, HAL.
   • Stéphane Zuber, 2015. "Harsanyi's theorem without the sure-thing principle: On the consistent aggregation of Monotonic Bernoullian and Archimedean preferences," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-01224145, HAL.
   • Stéphane Zuber, 2016. "Harsanyi’s theorem without the sure-thing principle: On the consistent aggregation of Monotonic Bernoullian and Archimedean preferences," Post-Print hal-01300587, HAL.
   • Stéphane Zuber, 2016. "Harsanyi’s theorem without the sure-thing principle: On the consistent aggregation of Monotonic Bernoullian and Archimedean preferences," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) hal-01300587, HAL.
   • Stéphane Zuber, 2015. "Harsanyi's theorem without the sure-thing principle: On the consistent aggregation of Monotonic Bernoullian and Archimedean preferences," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 15069, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
   • Stéphane Zuber, 2016. "Harsanyi’s theorem without the sure-thing principle: On the consistent aggregation of Monotonic Bernoullian and Archimedean preferences," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-01300587, HAL.
8. de Clippel, Geoffroy & Bejan, Camelia, 2011. "No profitable decompositions in quasi-linear allocation problems," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 146(5), pages 1995-2012, September.
   • Geoffroy de Clippel & Camelia Bejan, 2009. "No Profitable Decomposition in Quasi-Linear Allocation Problems," Working Papers 2009-6, Brown University, Department of Economics.
9. Omer F. Baris, 2018. "Timing effect in bargaining and ex ante efficiency of the relative utilitarian solution," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 84(4), pages 547-556, June.
10. Youngsub Chun, 2021. "Axioms concerning uncertain disagreement points in 2-person bargaining problems," The Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design, Society for the Promotion of Mechanism and Institution Design, University of York, vol. 6(1), pages 37-58, December.
11. Adler, Matthew D. & Treich, Nicolas, 2017. "Utilitarianism, prioritarianism, and intergenerational equity: A cake eating model," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 94-102.
12. Jaume Jordán & Alejandro Torreño & Mathijs Weerdt & Eva Onaindia, 2021. "A Non-cooperative Game-Theoretic Approach for Conflict Resolution in Multi-agent Planning," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 7-41, February.
13. Antoine Bommier & Stéphane Zuber, 2012. "The Pareto Principle Of Optimal Inequality," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 53(2), pages 593-608, May.
    • Bommier, Antoine & Zuber, Stéphane, 2009. "The Pareto Principle of Optimal Inequality," TSE Working Papers 09-132, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    • BOMMIER, Antoine & ZUBER, Stéphane, 2009. "The Pareto principle of optimal inequality," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2009009, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
14. Luciano Andreozzi & Matteo Ploner & Ivan Soraperra, 2013. "Justice among strangers. On altruism, inequality aversion and fairness," CEEL Working Papers 1304, Cognitive and Experimental Economics Laboratory, Department of Economics, University of Trento, Italia.
15. Chambers, Christopher P., 2005. "Allocation rules for land division," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 121(2), pages 236-258, April.
16. Anna Bogomolnaia & Hervé Moulin & Fedor Sandomirskiy, 2022. "On the Fair Division of a Random Object," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(2), pages 1174-1194, February.
    • Anna Bogomolnaia & Herve Moulin & Fedor Sandomirskiy, 2019. "On the fair division of a random object," Papers 1903.10361, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2021.
    • Anna Bogomolnaia & Hervé Moulin & Fedor Sandomirskiy, 2021. "On the Fair Division of a Random Object," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-03507995, HAL.
    • Anna Bogomolnaia & Hervé Moulin & Fedor Sandomirskiy, 2020. "On the fair division of a random object," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) hal-03047435, HAL.
    • Anna Bogomolnaia & Hervé Moulin & Fedor Sandomirskiy, 2021. "On the Fair Division of a Random Object," Post-Print halshs-03507995, HAL.
    • Anna Bogomolnaia & Hervé Moulin & Fedor Sandomirskiy, 2020. "On the fair division of a random object," Working Papers hal-03047435, HAL.
17. Pita, Cristina & Torregrosa, Ramon J., 2003. "The concavity axiom in bilateral monopoly," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 211-217, August.
18. Mariotti, Marco & Veneziani, Roberto, 2012. "Allocating chances of success in finite and infinite societies: The utilitarian criterion," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 226-236.
19. Shiran Rachmilevitch, 2014. "Randomized dictatorship and the Kalai–Smorodinsky bargaining solution," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 76(2), pages 173-177, February.
20. Ben-Porath, Elchanan & Gilboa, Itzhak & Schmeidler, David, 1997. "On the Measurement of Inequality under Uncertainty," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 194-204, July.
    • Itzhak Gilboa & Elchanan Ben-Porath & David Schmeidler, 1997. "On the Measurement of Inequality under Uncertainty," Post-Print hal-00481334, HAL.
21. Marc Fleurbaey, 2010. "Assessing Risky Social Situations," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 118(4), pages 649-680, August.
    • Marc Fleurbaey, 2007. "Assessing Risky Social Situations," IDEP Working Papers 0703, Institut d'economie publique (IDEP), Marseille, France, revised Jan 2007.
    • Fleurbaey, Marc, 2009. "Assessing risky social situations," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 27006, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    • FLEURBAEY, Marc, 2010. "Assessing risky social situations," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2289, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
22. Gutjahr, Walter J., 2021. "Inequity-averse stochastic decision processes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(1), pages 258-270.
23. Thibault Gajdos & Jean-Marc Tallon, 2002. "Fairness under Uncertainty," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(18), pages 1-7.
    • Thibault Gajdos & Jean-Marc Tallon, 2002. "Fairness under Uncertainty," Université Paris1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (Post-Print and Working Papers) halshs-00086032, HAL.
    • Thibault Gajdos & Jean-Marc Tallon, 2002. "Fairness under Uncertainty," Post-Print halshs-00086032, HAL.
24. Laruelle, Annick & Valenciano, Federico, 2009. "Cooperative bargaining foundations of the Shapley-Shubik index," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 242-255, January.
25. Antoine Bommier & Stéphane Zuber, 2008. "Can preferences for catastrophe avoidance reconcile social discounting with intergenerational equity?," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 31(3), pages 415-434, October.
26. S Mansoob Murshed, 2021. "Reformulating Jan Tinbergen’s normative vision on welfare and security," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(5), pages 962-972, September.
27. Hayashi, Takashi, 2008. "Regret aversion and opportunity dependence," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 242-268, March.
28. Chun, Youngsub, 2004. "On weighted Kalai-Samet solutions for non-transferable utility coalitional form games," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 257-267, May.
29. Lang, Fabian & Fink, Andreas & Brandt, Tobias, 2016. "Design of automated negotiation mechanisms for decentralized heterogeneous machine scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(1), pages 192-203.
30. Martinet, Vincent & Del Campo, Stellio & Cairns, Robert D., 2022. "Intragenerational inequality aversion and intergenerational equity," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    • Martinet, Vincent & Del Campo, Stellio & Cairns, Robert D., 2022. "Intragenerational inequality aversion and intergenerational equity," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue forthcomi.
    • Robert Cairns & Stellio Del Campo & Vincent Martinet, 2021. "Intragenerational inequality aversion and intergenerational equity," Working Papers 2021.04, FAERE - French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
    • Robert D. Cairns & Stellio del Campo & Vincent Martinet, 2024. "Intragenerational inequality aversion and intergenerational equity [Aversion à l'inégalité intragénérationnelle et équité intergénérationnelle]," Working Papers hal-03163144, HAL.
    • Vincent Martinet & Stellio del Campo & Robert Cairns, 2022. "Intragenerational inequality aversion and intergenerational equity [Aversion à l'inégalité intragénérationnelle et équité intergénérationnelle]," Post-Print hal-04133550, HAL.
    • Robert D. Cairns & Stellio Del Campo & Vincent Martinet, 2021. "Intragenerational Inequality Aversion and Intergenerational Equity," CESifo Working Paper Series 8941, CESifo.
31. Simon Grant & Atsushi Kajii & Ben Polak & Zvi Safra, 2010. "Generalized Utilitarianism and Harsanyi's Impartial Observer Theorem," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 78(6), pages 1939-1971, November.
    • Simon Grant & Atsushi Kajii & Ben Polak & Zvi Safra, 2006. "Generalized Utilitarianism and Harsanyi's Partial Observer Theorem," Levine's Bibliography 321307000000000419, UCLA Department of Economics.
    • Simon Grant & Atsushi Kajii & Ben Polak & Zvi Safra, 2006. "Generalized Utilitarianism and Harsanyi’s Partial Observer Theorem," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1578, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
32. Govindan, Kannan & Kadziński, Miłosz & Sivakumar, R., 2017. "Application of a novel PROMETHEE-based method for construction of a group compromise ranking to prioritization of green suppliers in food supply chain," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 129-145.
33. Raith, Matthias G., 2000. "Fair-negotiation procedures," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 303-322, May.
34. Claus-Jochen Haake & Cheng-Zhong Qin, 2018. "On unification of solutions to the bargaining problem," Working Papers CIE 113, Paderborn University, CIE Center for International Economics.
35. Raith, Matthias G., 2017. "Fair negotiation procedures," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 300, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
36. Gagnon, Nickolas & Bosmans, Kristof & Riedl, Arno, 2020. "The Effect of Unfair Chances and Gender Discrimination on Labor Supply," Research Memorandum 005, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    • Gagnon, Nickolas & Bosmans, Kristof & Riedl, Arno, 2020. "The Effect of Unfair Chances and Gender Discrimination on Labor Supply," IZA Discussion Papers 12912, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    • Nickolas Gagnon & Kristof Bosmans & Arno Riedl, 2020. "The Effect of Unfair Chances and Gender Discrimination on Labor Supply," CESifo Working Paper Series 8058, CESifo.
37. McCarthy, David & Mikkola, Kalle & Thomas, Teruji, 2016. "Utilitarianism with and without expected utility," MPRA Paper 72578, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • McCarthy, David & Mikkola, Kalle & Thomas, Teruji, 2016. "Utilitarianism with and without expected utility," MPRA Paper 90125, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 09 Aug 2016.
38. William Thomson, 2022. "On the axiomatic theory of bargaining: a survey of recent results," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(4), pages 491-542, December.
39. Alon Harel & Zvi Safra & Uzi Segal, 2003. "Ex-Post Egalitarianism," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 563, Boston College Department of Economics.
40. Louta, Malamati & Roussaki, Ioanna & Pechlivanos, Lambros, 2008. "An intelligent agent negotiation strategy in the electronic marketplace environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 1327-1345, June.
41. Simon Grant & Atsushi Kajii & Ben Polak, 2003. "Accidents of Birth, Life Chances and the Impartial Observer," ISER Discussion Paper 0582, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
42. Thomas Baudin, 2012. "The Optimal Trade-Off Between Quality and Quantity with Unknown Number of Survivors," Mathematical Population Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 94-113, April.
43. Jaume García Segarra & Miguel Ginés Vilar, 2011. "Weighted Proportional Losses Solution," ThE Papers 10/21, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
44. Geoffroy de Clippel, 2010. "Copmment on "The Veil of Public Ignorance"," Working Papers 2010-3, Brown University, Department of Economics.
45. Xue, Licun, 2008. "The bargaining within," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 145-147, November.
46. Salonen, Hannu, 1998. "Egalitarian solutions for n-person bargaining games," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 291-306, May.
47. Yukinori Iwata, 2022. "Ranking nomination rules on the basis of nominating power distributions," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 18(3), pages 382-401, September.
48. Shiran Rachmilevitch, 2017. "Axiomatizations of the equal-loss and weighted equal-loss bargaining solutions," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 49(1), pages 1-9, June.
49. Amparo M. Mármol Conde & Clara Ponsatí Obiols, 2006. "Bargaining Multiple Issues with Leximin Preferences," Economic Working Papers at Centro de Estudios Andaluces E2006/05, Centro de Estudios Andaluces.
50. Christoph M. Rheinberger & Nicolas Treich, 2017. "Attitudes Toward Catastrophe," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 67(3), pages 609-636, July.
    • Rheinberger, Christoph & Treich, Nicolas, 2016. "Attitudes Toward Catastrophe," TSE Working Papers 16-635, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
51. Schumacher, Johannes M., 2021. "Ex-ante estate division under strong Pareto efficiency," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 10-24.
52. Marco Mariotii, 1996. "Fair bargains: distributive justice and Nash Bargaining Theory," Game Theory and Information 9611003, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 06 Dec 1996.
53. Alós-Ferrer, Carlos & García-Segarra, Jaume & Ginés-Vilar, Miguel, 2017. "Super-additivity and concavity are equivalent for Pareto optimal n-agent bargaining solutions," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 50-52.
54. Shiran Rachmilevitch, 2021. "Step-by-step negotiations and utilitarianism," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 50(2), pages 433-445, June.
55. Louis Kaplow, 2022. "Optimal Income Taxation," NBER Working Papers 30199, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
56. Forgo, F. & Szidarovszky, F., 2003. "On the relation between the Nash bargaining solution and the weighting method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 108-116, May.
57. Chwolka, Anne & Raith, Matthias G., 2001. "Group preference aggregation with the AHP - implications for multiple-issue agendas," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 176-186, July.
58. Balakrishnan, P.V. (Sundar) & Gómez, Juan Camilo & Vohra, Rakesh V., 2011. "The Tempered Aspirations solution for bargaining problems with a reference point," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 144-150.
59. Grant, Simon & Kajii, A. & Polak, B., 2002. "Accident of Birth, Life Chances adn the Impartial Observer," Working Papers 2002-08, Rice University, Department of Economics.