IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/kdifoc/v54y2015ip1-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Resetting Education Policy to Restore Social Mobility

Author

Listed:
  • Kim, Hisam

Abstract

Korean society, once characterized by a high degree of intergenerational social mobility, faces increasing pessimism over the significance of one's efforts in moving up the social ladder. Rising skepticism is being cast on the role of education as a pathway to social ascent, given how intergenerational transfer of social status is increasing and the education gap between social classes is widening. Accordingly, the time has come to intervene in the early stages of personal development to prevent wasting talent; to take aggressive measures against inequality; to pursue educational reforms in order to help the younger generations develop competencies and explore diverse paths to success; and to make policy efforts to prevent the social exclusion of the underprivileged. - Low social mobility undermines equality, prohibits an effective distribution of resources, and harms economic growth. - Pessimism has been rising over intergenerational upward mobility, and belief in the significance of an individual's effort has been weakening. - The development of innate cognitive ability varies depending on the environment in which a person is raised. - A gap between social classes and regional representation in admissions has begun to widen at top-tier universities. - The correlation between parental income and children's earnings is marginal for the current middle-aged generation. However, the growing income inequality and race for private education have prompted concerns over intergenerational social mobility. - Intergenerational persistence of income declined during the period of fast economic growth only to increase later. - Belief in the role of education as a ladder of social ascent increased, but has declined in recent years. - To fully realize the potential of underprivileged students, it is necessary to intervene in the early stages of student development and expand affirmative action policies and follow-up support. - The education system should evolve in a way that fosters openness to exploring multiple paths to success. In particular, it is important to diversify the school curriculum and innovate pedagogical paradigms. - Policies should aim at equipping students with basic academic skills, developing useful, relevant skill sets, and expanding public employment services to prevent exclusion of the underprivileged young and maximizing the use of human resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Kim, Hisam, 2015. "Resetting Education Policy to Restore Social Mobility," KDI Focus 54, Korea Development Institute (KDI).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:kdifoc:v:54:y:2015:i::p:1-15
    DOI: 10.22740/kdi.focus.e.2015.54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/200855/1/kdi-focus-54.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22740/kdi.focus.e.2015.54?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miles Corak, 2013. "Income Inequality, Equality of Opportunity, and Intergenerational Mobility," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 27(3), pages 79-102, Summer.
    2. Linda Datcher Loury, 2006. "Some Contacts Are More Equal than Others: Informal Networks, Job Tenure, and Wages," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 24(2), pages 299-318, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gorji, Yasaman & Carney, Michael & Prakash, Rajshree, 2020. "Indirect nepotism: Network sponsorship, social capital and career performance in show business families," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 11(3).
    2. Takeda, Kohei, 2022. "The geography of structural transformation: effects on inequality and mobility," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118050, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Patrizio Piraino, 2020. "Drivers of mobility," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2020-6, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. Joshi, Sumit & Mahmud, Ahmed Saber & Sarangi, Sudipta, 2020. "Network formation with multigraphs and strategic complementarities," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    5. Piraino Patrizio, 2020. "Drivers of mobility," WIDER Working Paper Series wp2020-6, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    6. Sven Resnjanskij & Jens Ruhose & Simon Wiederhold & Ludger Wößmann, 2021. "Mentoring verbessert die Arbeitsmarktchancen von stark benachteiligten Jugendlichen," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 74(02), pages 31-38, February.
    7. Fields, Gary S. & Meng, Xin & Song, Yang, 2022. "Earnings mobility during labor market reforms in urban China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    8. Jo Blanden, 2019. "Intergenerational income persistence," IZA World of Labor, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), pages 176-176, January.
    9. Michele Raitano & Francesco Vona & Claudia Vittori, 2015. "The effect of parental background along the son's earnings distribution : does one model fit for all?," Working Papers hal-03459749, HAL.
    10. Veenstra, Gerry & Vanzella-Yang, Adam, 2022. "Interactions between parental and personal socioeconomic resources and self-rated health: Adjudicating between the resource substitution and resource multiplication theories," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    11. Francesco Andreoli & Eugenio Peluso, 2016. "So close yet so unequal: Reconsidering spatial inequality in U.S. cities," Working Papers 21/2016, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    12. Bramoullé, Yann & Goyal, Sanjeev, 2016. "Favoritism," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 16-27.
    13. Paul Anand & Jere R. Behrman & Hai-Anh H. Dang & Sam Jones, 2018. "Inequality of opportunity in education: Accounting for the contributions of Sibs, schools and sorting across East Africa," Working Papers 480, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
    14. Robert Rogers & Doan Hai Ma & Tra Nguyen & Ngoc Anh Nguyen, 2019. "Early childhood education and cognitive outcomes in adolescence: a longitudinal study from Vietnam," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(6), pages 658-669, November.
    15. French, Eric Baird & O’Dea, Cormac & MacCuish, Jamie, 2021. "The Intergenerational Elasticity of Earnings: Exploring the Mechanisms," CEPR Discussion Papers 15975, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Naguib, Costanza, 2019. "Estimating the Heterogeneous Impact of the Free Movement of Persons on Relative Wage Mobility," Economics Working Paper Series 1903, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    17. Razafindrakoto, Mireille & Roubaud, François & Rua, Linda, 2021. "Hyper-elites and network: Capturing the powerful upper tail in Madagascar," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    18. Chong Lu, 2022. "The effect of migration on rural residents’ intergenerational subjective social status mobility in China," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3279-3308, October.
    19. Jolakoski, Petar & Pal, Arnab & Sandev, Trifce & Kocarev, Ljupco & Metzler, Ralf & Stojkoski, Viktor, 2023. "A first passage under resetting approach to income dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P1).
    20. Jeremy Greenwood & Nezih Guner & Guillaume Vandenbroucke, 2017. "Family Economics Writ Large," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 55(4), pages 1346-1434, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:kdifoc:v:54:y:2015:i::p:1-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/kdiiikr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.