IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/ifsoex/8.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How to boost the European Green Deal's scale and ambition

Author

Listed:
  • Wildauer, Rafael
  • Leitch, Stuart
  • Kapeller, Jakob

Abstract

The European Green Deal (EGD) is the European Union's flagship strategy to tackle climate change. This policy study compares the ambition and scale of the EGD with the current relevant scientific literature. The goal is to assess whether the current proposals are capable of fulfilling the EU's commitment to limit global warming to 1.5°C in line with the Paris Agreement. (...) Taken together, this suggests that annual investment requirements of up to € 855 billion (excluding transport) in the EU27 would be required for a successful transition. Setting and delivering on more ambitious GHG emission reduction targets requires the use of all possible policy tools. The EGD is a promising start in this context as it relies on a broad set of instruments from regulations, carbon markets, taxes and public investment. Given the limited time available however the EGD should go a step further and upgrade the Sustainable Europe Investment Plan into a comprehensive climate master plan which determines clear targets and timelines for renewable energy capacity, building renovations, transport infrastructure, R&D targets etc. This would not only provide the private sector with clear long-term signals but also allow for timely monitoring of the EU's progress.

Suggested Citation

  • Wildauer, Rafael & Leitch, Stuart & Kapeller, Jakob, 2020. "How to boost the European Green Deal's scale and ambition," ifso expertise 8, University of Duisburg-Essen, Institute for Socioeconomics (ifso).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:ifsoex:8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/271590/1/ifso-expertise08.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jakob Kapeller & Bernhard Schütz & Dennis Tamesberger, 2016. "From free to civilized trade: a European perspective," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(3), pages 320-328, September.
    2. Fabra, Natalia, 2018. "A primer on capacity mechanisms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 323-335.
    3. Kevin Anderson, 2012. "The inconvenient truth of carbon offsets," Nature, Nature, vol. 484(7392), pages 7-7, April.
    4. Alice Larkin & Jaise Kuriakose & Maria Sharmina & Kevin Anderson, 2018. "What if negative emission technologies fail at scale? Implications of the Paris Agreement for big emitting nations," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 690-714, July.
    5. Kelly, J. Andrew & Fu, Miao & Clinch, J. Peter, 2016. "Residential home heating: The potential for air source heat pump technologies as an alternative to solid and liquid fuels," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 431-442.
    6. Capros, Pantelis & Zazias, Georgios & Evangelopoulou, Stavroula & Kannavou, Maria & Fotiou, Theofano & Siskos, Pelopidas & De Vita, Alessia & Sakellaris, Konstantinos, 2019. "Energy-system modelling of the EU strategy towards climate-neutrality," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Claudius Gräbner & Philipp Heimberger & Jakob Kapeller, 2020. "Pandemic pushes polarisation: the Corona crisis and macroeconomic divergence in the Eurozone," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 47(3), pages 425-438, September.
    2. Jamie Morgan, 2021. "Learning to Treat Our Natural World Realistically Through Unlearning Mainstream Economics? A Commentary on the Recent Work of Peter Söderbaum," Economic Thought, World Economics Association, vol. 10(1), pages 14-31, July.
    3. Stephan Schulmeister, 2020. "Fixing long-term price paths for fossil energy: the optimal incentive for limiting global warming," ICAE Working Papers 112, Johannes Kepler University, Institute for Comprehensive Analysis of the Economy.
    4. Yurchenko, Yuliya, 2020. "The energy sector and socio-ecological transformation: Europe in the global context," Greenwich Papers in Political Economy 30519, University of Greenwich, Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre.
    5. Philipp Heimberger & Andreas Lichtenberger, 2022. "RRF 2.0: Ein permanenter EU-Investitionsfonds im Kontext von Energiekrise, Klimawandel und EU-Fiskalregeln," wiiw Research Reports in German language 23, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keppler, Jan Horst & Quemin, Simon & Saguan, Marcelo, 2022. "Why the sustainable provision of low-carbon electricity needs hybrid markets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    2. Piotr Gradziuk & Aleksandra Siudek & Anna M. Klepacka & Wojciech J. Florkowski & Anna Trocewicz & Iryna Skorokhod, 2022. "Heat Pump Installation in Public Buildings: Savings and Environmental Benefits in Underserved Rural Areas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Stergios Statharas & Yannis Moysoglou & Pelopidas Siskos & Pantelis Capros, 2021. "Simulating the Evolution of Business Models for Electricity Recharging Infrastructure Development by 2030: A Case Study for Greece," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-24, April.
    4. Meles, Tensay Hadush & Ryan, Lisa & Mukherjee, Sanghamitra C., 2022. "Heterogeneity in preferences for renewable home heating systems among Irish households," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    5. Mier, Mathias, 2021. "Efficient pricing of electricity revisited," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    6. Xu, Guangyue & Dong, Haoyun & Xu, Zhenci & Bhattarai, Nishan, 2022. "China can reach carbon neutrality before 2050 by improving economic development quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    7. Natalia Fabra & Massimo Motta & Martin Peitz, 2021. "Versorgungsengpässe während einer Pandemie und was dagegen getan werden kann," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 101(8), pages 600-603, August.
    8. Adeline Montlaur & Luis Delgado & César Trapote-Barreira, 2021. "Analytical Models for CO 2 Emissions and Travel Time for Short-to-Medium-Haul Flights Considering Available Seats," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-23, September.
    9. Salimi, Mohammad & Faramarzi, Davoud & Hosseinian, Seyed Hossein & Gharehpetian, Gevork B., 2020. "Replacement of natural gas with electricity to improve seismic service resilience: An application to domestic energy utilities in Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    10. Li, Sihui & Gong, Guangcai & Peng, Jinqing, 2019. "Dynamic coupling method between air-source heat pumps and buildings in China’s hot-summer/cold-winter zone," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    11. Raghavan, Shuba V. & Wei, Max & Kammen, Daniel M., 2017. "use natural gas consumption in 201Scenarios to decarbonize residential water heating in California," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 441-451.
    12. Villalobos, Cristian & Negrete-Pincetic, Matías & Figueroa, Nicolás & Lorca, Álvaro & Olivares, Daniel, 2021. "The impact of short-term pricing on flexible generation investments in electricity markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    13. Gräbner-Radkowitsch, Claudius & Strunk, Birte, 2023. "Degrowth and the Global South: The twin problem of global dependencies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    14. Michele Fioretti & Jorge Tamayo, 2021. "Saving for a Dry Day: Coal, Dams, and the Energy Transition," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03389152, HAL.
    15. Baranzini, Andrea & Borzykowski, Nicolas & Carattini, Stefano, 2018. "Carbon offsets out of the woods? Acceptability of domestic vs. international reforestation programmes in the lab," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-12.
    16. repec:spo:wpecon:info:hdl:2441/1qif9fqehq930ovnr511k1el4f is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Stefano Carattini & Andrea Baranzini & Philippe Thalmann & Frédéric Varone & Frank Vöhringer, 2017. "Green Taxes in a Post-Paris World: Are Millions of Nays Inevitable?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(1), pages 97-128, September.
    18. Liang Shen & Fei Lin & T. C. E. Cheng, 2022. "Low-Carbon Transition Models of High Carbon Supply Chains under the Mixed Carbon Cap-and-Trade and Carbon Tax Policy in the Carbon Neutrality Era," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-21, September.
    19. Klaus Eisenack & Mathias Mier, 2019. "Peak-load pricing with different types of dispatchability," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 105-124, December.
    20. Johan Warburg & Britta Frommeyer & Julia Koch & Sven‐Olaf Gerdt & Gerhard Schewe, 2021. "Voluntary carbon offsetting and consumer choices for environmentally critical products—An experimental study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 3009-3024, November.
    21. Rocio Gonzalez Sanchez & Anatoli Chatzipanagi & Georgia Kakoulaki & Marco Buffi & Sandor Szabo, 2023. "The Role of Direct Air Capture in EU’s Decarbonisation and Associated Carbon Intensity for Synthetic Fuels Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-28, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:ifsoex:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isduede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.