IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/iamodp/180.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ableitung optimaler Preisrelationen in einer geschlossenen und offenen Volkswirtschaft: Der neoklassische Ansatz

Author

Listed:
  • Koester, Ulrich
  • von Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan

Abstract

[Einleitung] In diesem Kapitel soll gezeigt werden, wie sich unter neoklassischen Bedingungen Gleichgewichtspreise einstellen und damit die Effizienz des Faktoreinsatzes und die Wohlfahrt in der Gesellschaft maximiert werden kann. Dieses Kapitel ist vornehmlich für Studierende gedacht, die bisher mit dem Instrumentarium der Neoklassik, wie es in Standardlehrbüchern dargestellt wird, nicht vertraut sind. Es wird daher auf eine Ergänzung der Analyse mit dem Instrumentarium der Institutionenökonomie verzichtet. Das Kapitel hat drei in sich geschlossene Teile. Im ersten Teil wird die Preisbildung für Konsumgüter in einer geschlossenen Volkswirtschaft behandelt. Im zweiten Teil wird auf die Preisbildung auf den Faktormärkten bei gleichgewichtigen Konsumgüterpreisen eingegangen und im dritten Teil werden die Besonderheiten der Preisbildung einer offenen Volkswirtschaft dargestellt.

Suggested Citation

  • Koester, Ulrich & von Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan, 2018. "Ableitung optimaler Preisrelationen in einer geschlossenen und offenen Volkswirtschaft: Der neoklassische Ansatz," IAMO Discussion Papers 180, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:iamodp:180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/191452/1/1046121553.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Corden, W. Max., 1997. "Trade Policy and Economic Welfare," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780198775348.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Athukorala, Prema-chandra & Narayanan, Suresh, 2018. "Economic corridors and regional development: The Malaysian experience," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-14.
    2. Lucy Rees & Rod Tyers, 2004. "On the Robustness of Short Run Gains from Trade Reform," CEPR Discussion Papers 474, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Economics, Australian National University.
    3. Andre Nassif & Carmem Aparecida Feijo & Eliane Araújo, 2016. "Structural change, catching up and falling behind in the BRICS: A comparative analysis based on trade pattern and Thirlwall’s Law," PSL Quarterly Review, Economia civile, vol. 69(279), pages 373-421.
    4. Andrew Seltzer & Martin Shanahan & Claire Wright, 2022. "The Rise and Fall and Rise (?) of Economic History in Australia," CEH Discussion Papers 05, Centre for Economic History, Research School of Economics, Australian National University.
    5. Anderson, Kym, 2020. "Consumer Taxes on Alcohol: An International Comparison over Time," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(1), pages 42-70, February.
    6. Melitz, Marc J., 2005. "When and how should infant industries be protected?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 177-196, May.
    7. Wilfred J. Ethier, 2004. "Political Externalities, Nondiscrimination, and a Multilateral World," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(3), pages 303-320, August.
    8. Kym Anderson & Will Martin, 2009. "Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in Asia," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2611.
    9. Luka, Oksana & Levkovych, Inna, 2004. "Intra-industry trade in agricultural and food products: the case of Ukraine," IAMO Discussion Papers 78, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    10. IAN COXHEAD & Sisira Jayasuriya, "undated". "Economic Growth, Development Policy and the Environment in the Philippines," Wisconsin-Madison Agricultural and Applied Economics Staff Papers 430, Wisconsin-Madison Agricultural and Applied Economics Department.
    11. Bernard Hoekman & Douglas Nelson, 2020. "Rethinking international subsidy rules," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(12), pages 3104-3132, December.
    12. Kym Anderson, 2003. "Measuring Effects of Trade Policy Distortions: How Far Have We Come?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 413-440, April.
    13. Tavernier, Edmund M., 2001. "Challenges to Economic Growth in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Preliminary Exploration," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 31(3), pages 277-291, Winter.
    14. P. Sai-Wing Ho, 2013. "Does Mill's case for infant industry protection capture Hamilton's and List's arguments for promoting industrial development?," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 546-571, October.
    15. Wilfred J. Ethier, 2002. "Unilateralism in a Multilateral World," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 112(479), pages 266-292, April.
    16. Dluhosch Barbara, 2010. "The Second-Mover Advantage in International Trade Negotiations," Global Economy Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-37, February.
    17. Anderson, Kym & Nelgen, Signe, 2012. "Trade Barrier Volatility and Agricultural Price Stabilization," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 36-48.
    18. Anderson, Kym & Yao, Shunli, 2001. "China, GMOs and World Trade in Agricultural and Textile Products," Conference papers 330922, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    19. McCalla, Alex F. & Valdes, Alberto, 1997. "Diversification and International Trade," 1997 Conference, August 10-16, 1997, Sacramento, California 197032, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Pflüger, Michael & Suedekum, Jens, 2013. "Subsidizing firm entry in open economies," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 258-271.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:iamodp:180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iamoode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.