IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/gluwps/96402.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Inequality and the Financial System - The Case of Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Detzer, Daniel

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between changes in the financial sector and the increasing inequality in Germany. For this, first an overview about the development of the main inequality indicators for Germany is given, which show inequality has been rising since the 1980s. Thereafter, the main features of the German financial system and its main changes in the last decades are reviewed. It is also looked at employment and incomes in the financial sector to determine, whether exorbitant growth of the financial sector, as observed in other countries, could be responsible for the increasing inequality. Thereafter, the relation of the financial sector with the non-financial sector is examined. First, a look at the financing structure of non-financial firms is taken. Subsequently, it is studied how changed behaviour in the financial sector may have led to increased inequality. It is argued that a multitude of factors including the retreat of the big banks from the German Inc., the changes in securities market regulation, the occurrence of new types of financial investors have all changed the corporate governance system in a way that made it more conducive to inequality. Then, the most important regulatory reforms and reform proposals for the financial sector are outlined. In the last section of the paper the main results are summarised and some general conclusions are drawn.

Suggested Citation

  • Detzer, Daniel, 2014. "Inequality and the Financial System - The Case of Germany," GLU Working Papers 23, Global Labour University (GLU).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:gluwps:96402
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/96402/1/glu-wp_no-23.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henk De Jong, 1997. "The Governance Structure and Performance of Large European Corporations," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 1(1), pages 5-27, March.
    2. Sebastian Dullien, 2013. "Umbau der Finanzmärkte: Übermäßiges Vertrauen in Marktrationalität hält an," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 93(1), pages 23-29, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel Detzer, 2015. "Inequality and the Financial System— The Case of Germany," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 54(4), pages 585-608.
    2. Sara Saggese & Fabrizia Sarto & Riccardo Viganò, 2021. "Do women directors contribute to R&D? The role of critical mass and expert power," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(2), pages 593-623, June.
    3. Hassel, Anke & Höpner, Martin & Kurdelbusch, Antje & Rehder, Britta & Zugehör, Rainer, 2001. "Two dimensions of the internationalization of firms," MPIfG Working Paper 01/3, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    4. A. Hassel & M. Höpner & A. Kurdelbusch & B. Rehder & R. Zugehör, 2003. "Two Dimensions of the Internationalization of Firms," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 705-723, May.
    5. Alessandro Zattoni & Emmanouil Dedoulis & Stergios Leventis & Hans Van Ees, 2020. "Corporate governance and institutions—A review and research agenda," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 465-487, November.
    6. Gerhard Schnyder, 2008. "Revisiting the Party Paradox of Finance Capitalism: Evidence from Switzerland, Sweden and the Netherlands," Working Papers wp372, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    7. Höpner, Martin, 2001. "Corporate governance in transition: Ten empirical findings on shareholder value and industrial relations in Germany," MPIfG Discussion Paper 01/5, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    8. Antonio Majocchi & Roger Strange, 2012. "International Diversification," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 52(6), pages 879-900, December.
    9. Detzer, Daniel, 2019. "Financialization made in Germany: A review," IPE Working Papers 122/2019, Berlin School of Economics and Law, Institute for International Political Economy (IPE).
    10. Braun, Benjamin & Deeg, Richard, 2019. "Strong firms, weak banks: The financial consequences of Germany's export-led growth model," MPIfG Discussion Paper 19/5, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    11. Belaounia, Samia & Tao, Ran & Zhao, Hong, 2020. "Gender equality's impact on female directors’ efficacy: A multi-country study," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(5).
    12. Colwyn Jones, T. & Dugdale, David, 2002. "The ABC bandwagon and the juggernaut of modernity," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 27(1-2), pages 121-163.
    13. Streeck, Wolfgang, 2001. "The transformation of corporate organization in Europe: An overview," MPIfG Working Paper 01/8, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    14. repec:ilo:ilowps:485244 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Vitols, Sigurt, 2003. "Negotiated shareholder value: The German version of an Anglo-American practice," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Institutions, States, Markets SP II 2003-25, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    16. Fabio Zona, 2015. "Board ownership and processes in family firms," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 105-122, January.
    17. Höpner, Martin, 2003. "European corporate governance reform and the German party paradox," MPIfG Discussion Paper 03/4, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    18. Kliewe, Martina, 2007. "Die Entwicklung der Corporate Finance Strukturen deutscher Unternehmen und deren Auswirkungen auf die Arbeitsbeziehungen," Working Papers on Economic Governance 26, University of Hamburg, Department of Socioeconomics.
    19. John W. Cioffi & Martin Höpner, 2006. "The Political Paradox of Finance Capitalism: Interests, Preferences, and Center-Left Party Politics in Corporate Governance Reform," Politics & Society, , vol. 34(4), pages 463-502, December.
    20. Philipp Kern & Howard Gospel, 2023. "The effects of strategy and institutions on value creation and appropriation in firms: A longitudinal study of three telecom companies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 343-366, January.
    21. Zona, Fabio, 2014. "Board leadership structure and diversity over CEO time in office: A test of the evolutionary perspective on Italian firms," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 672-681.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:gluwps:96402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://global-labour-university.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.