IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/glodps/1520.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Out-of-field teaching and instructional practices in Years 7-10 mathematics classes in Australia: evidence from TALIS 2018

Author

Listed:
  • Shah, Chandra
  • Watt, Helen M. G.
  • Richardson, Paul W.

Abstract

To compare 'in-field' versus 'out-of-field' teachers of Years 7-10 mathematics in Australia on key demographic and instructional dimensions, we analysed nationally representative system data collected by the OECD Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS), one of the world's largest survey of teachers and school leaders. Latest available TALIS 2018 data from teachers teaching Years 7-10 mathematics (N = 1,120; 284 of whom taught mathematics out-of-field) showed out-of-field teachers were mostly from a STEM background qualified to teach science and/or technology, and were less commonly older or more experienced. Out-of-field teachers were more concentrated in public schools, having less principal autonomy, lower academic pressure, with greater school delinquency and violence. There were no statistically significant differences between in-field and out-of-field teachers on their non-mathematics specific motivations, values, self-efficacy, professional development needs and barriers, professional engagement or wellbeing. Specific to mathematics teaching, we compared 'in-field' versus 'out-of-field' Years 7-10 mathematics teacher reports of key instructional practices specific to a 'target' mathematics class (N = 472; 65 of whom taught mathematics out-of-field), which revealed likely negative consequences for student engagement and learning. Out-of-field teachers spent more time than in-field teachers on classroom management and disciplining students, lost more time due to student interruption, reported much disruptive noise in class, only occasionally presented tasks for which there was no obvious solution, and spent less time teaching, although they did not differ on time spent in practices related to instructional clarity. Out-of-field teachers also reported more time setting students extended projects to complete, letting students evaluate their own progress, and providing immediate feedback when observing students working on particular tasks. Targeted mathematics classes taught by out-of-field teachers had higher concentrations of low-achievers, indicating a bias in which students are assigned teachers not specialised to teach mathematics. Recommendations are advanced regarding professional development priorities for teachers teaching mathematics out-of-field.

Suggested Citation

  • Shah, Chandra & Watt, Helen M. G. & Richardson, Paul W., 2024. "Out-of-field teaching and instructional practices in Years 7-10 mathematics classes in Australia: evidence from TALIS 2018," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1520, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:glodps:1520
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/306474/1/GLO-DP-1520.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. Kirabo Jackson & Jonah E. Rockoff & Douglas O. Staiger, 2014. "Teacher Effects and Teacher-Related Policies," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 6(1), pages 801-825, August.
    2. Charles T. Clotfelter & Helen F. Ladd & Jacob L. Vigdor, 2010. "Teacher Credentials and Student Achievement in High School: A Cross-Subject Analysis with Student Fixed Effects," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 45(3).
    3. Fabiola Sáez-Delgado & Yaranay López-Angulo & Javier Mella-Norambuena & Catherine Baeza-Sepúlveda & Carolina Contreras-Saavedra & Gisela Lozano-Peña, 2022. "Teacher Self-Regulation and Its Relationship with Student Self-Regulation in Secondary Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    4. C. Kirabo Jackson, 2018. "What Do Test Scores Miss? The Importance of Teacher Effects on Non–Test Score Outcomes," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 126(5), pages 2072-2107.
    5. Alfonso Echazarra & Daniel Salinas & Ildefonso Méndez & Vanessa Denis & Giannina Rech, 2016. "How teachers teach and students learn: Successful strategies for school," OECD Education Working Papers 130, OECD Publishing.
    6. Lisa Shah & Cooper Jannuzzo & Taufiq Hassan & Bogdan Gadidov & Herman E Ray & Gregory T Rushton, 2019. "Diagnosing the current state of out-of-field teaching in high school science and mathematics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-12, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthew A. Kraft & John P. Papay & Olivia L. Chi, 2020. "Teacher Skill Development: Evidence from Performance Ratings by Principals," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 315-347, March.
    2. Busso, Matias & Montaño, Sebastián & Muñoz-Morales, Juan & Pope, Nolan G., 2024. "The unintended consequences of merit-based teacher selection: Evidence from a large-scale reform in Colombia," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    3. Matteo Bobba & Tim Ederer & Gianmarco León-Ciliotta & Christopher A. Neilson & Marco Nieddu, 2021. "Teacher compensation and structural inequality: Evidence from centralized teacher school choice in Perú," Economics Working Papers 1788, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
    4. Drouet Arias, Marcelo & Elacqua, Gregory & Marotta, Luana & Rosa, Leonardo, 2022. "Does an Education Major Matter for Teaching?: The Relationship between Teachers Degree and Student Achievement," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 12638, Inter-American Development Bank.
    5. Huang, Wei & Li, Teng & Pan, Yinghao & Ren, Jinyang, 2023. "Teacher characteristics and student performance: Evidence from random teacher-student assignments in China," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 747-781.
    6. Serena Canaan & Antoine Deeb & Pierre Mouganie, 2022. "Adviser Value Added and Student Outcomes: Evidence from Randomly Assigned College Advisers," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 14(4), pages 151-191, November.
    7. Hayes, Michael S. & Liu, Jing & Gershenson, Seth, 2023. "Who refers whom? The effects of teacher characteristics on disciplinary office referrals," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    8. Hinrichs, Peter, 2021. "What kind of teachers are schools looking for? Evidence from a randomized field experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 395-411.
    9. Grönqvist, Erik & Vlachos, Jonas, 2016. "One size fits all? The effects of teachers' cognitive and social abilities on student achievement," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 138-150.
    10. Kirabo Jackson & Alexey Makarin, 2018. "Can Online Off-the-Shelf Lessons Improve Student Outcomes? Evidence from a Field Experiment," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 10(3), pages 226-254, August.
    11. Andrew Agopsowicz & Chris Robinson & Ralph Stinebrickner & Todd Stinebrickner, 2020. "Careers and Mismatch for College Graduates: College and Noncollege Jobs," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 55(4), pages 1194-1221.
    12. Jose Maria Cabrera & Dinand Webbink, 2020. "Do Higher Salaries Yield Better Teachers and Better Student Outcomes?," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 55(4), pages 1222-1257.
    13. Gershenson, Seth, 2021. "Identifying and Producing Effective Teachers," IZA Discussion Papers 14096, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Jacob, Brian A. & Rockoff, Jonah E. & Taylor, Eric S. & Lindy, Benjamin & Rosen, Rachel, 2018. "Teacher applicant hiring and teacher performance: Evidence from DC public schools," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 81-97.
    15. Cordero, Jose M. & Gil-Izquierdo, María, 2018. "The effect of teaching strategies on student achievement: An analysis using TALIS-PISA-link," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 1313-1331.
    16. Dinand Webbink & José María Cabrera, 2016. "Do higher salaries yield better teachers and better student outcomes?," Documentos de Trabajo/Working Papers 1604, Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales y Economia. Universidad de Montevideo..
    17. Backes, Ben & Cowan, James & Goldhaber, Dan & Theobald, Roddy, 2024. "Four years of pandemic-era emergency licenses: retention and effectiveness of emergency-licensed Massachusetts teachers over time," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    18. Evan Riehl & Meredith Welch, 2023. "Accountability, Test Prep Incentives, and the Design of Math and English Exams," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(1), pages 60-96, January.
    19. Sancassani, Pietro, 2023. "The effect of teacher subject-specific qualifications on student science achievement," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    20. Cowan, James & Goldhaber, Dan, 2018. "Do bonuses affect teacher staffing and student achievement in high poverty schools? Evidence from an incentive for national board certified teachers in Washington State," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 138-152.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    out-of-field teaching in mathematics; teacher efficacy; instructional practice;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I22 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Educational Finance; Financial Aid
    • I24 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Inequality
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy
    • I29 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Other
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:glodps:1520. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/glabode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.