IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/esprep/300727.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measuring Economic Graph Competence

Author

Listed:
  • Ring, Malte
  • Oberrauch, Luis

Abstract

The ability to work with graphs is at the core of the economic domain and is also one of the central challenges for novices in the field. To accurately assess the graph competence of higher education students, we developed and tested an 18-item graph competence instrument with different economics graphs. The sample consisted of 579 students from multiple higher education institutions in southwestern Germany. Item analysis based on item response theory revealed that the instrument addresses a wide range of ability levels and discriminates sufficiently between low- and high-ability learners. Concerning content validity, we find meaningful correlations between test scores and domain-specific knowledge and generic understanding of numerical quantities. Item difficulties indicate that questions that go beyond simple graph operations are challenging for learners.

Suggested Citation

  • Ring, Malte & Oberrauch, Luis, 2024. "Measuring Economic Graph Competence," EconStor Preprints 300727, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:300727
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/300727/1/Measuring-Economic-Graph-Competence.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tim Kaiser & Luis Oberrauch & Günther Seeber, 2020. "Measuring economic competence of secondary school students in Germany," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(3-4), pages 227-242, August.
    2. Elchanan Cohn & Sharon Cohn & Donald C. Balch & James Bradley, 2001. "Do Graphs Promote Learning in Principles of Economics?," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 299-310, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gourley, Patrick, 2021. "Back to basics: How reading the text and taking notes improves learning," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    2. David Zetland & Carlo Russo & Navin Yavapolkul, 2010. "Teaching Economic Principles: Algebra, Graph or Both?," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 55(1), pages 123-131, May.
    3. Joseph G. Eisenhauer, 2018. "Algebraic Optimization: Marginal Analysis without Calculus," Journal for Economic Educators, Middle Tennessee State University, Business and Economic Research Center, vol. 18(1), pages 16-27, Spring.
    4. Eberle, Mira & Oberrauch, Luis, 2023. "What a difference three years of economics education make: Evidence from lower stream schools in Germany," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    5. Coates, Dennis & Humphreys, Brad R. & Kane, John & Vachris, Michelle A., 2004. ""No significant distance" between face-to-face and online instruction: evidence from principles of economics," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 533-546, October.
    6. Süssmuth, Bernd & Gawellek, Bastian & Koenings, Fabian, 2021. "Economics education, childhood socialization, and the transmission of allocation preferences," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    7. Ibrahim Demir & Robert D. Tollison, 2015. "Graphs in Economics," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(3), pages 1834-1847.
    8. Kaiser, Tim & Oberrauch, Luis, 2021. "Economic education at the expense of indoctrination? Evidence from Germany," EconStor Preprints 245801, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    9. Mario Arturo Ruiz Estrada & Su-Fei Yap & Noor Azina Binti Ismail, 2017. "Revisiting the Phillips Curve: Visualization from a Multidimensional Graphical Perspective," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 11(1), March.
    10. Cohn, Elchanan & Cohn, Sharon & Balch, Donald C. & Bradley, James Jr., 2004. "Determinants of undergraduate GPAs: SAT scores, high-school GPA and high-school rank," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 577-586, December.
    11. Elchanan Cohn & Sharon Cohn & Donald C. Balch & James Bradley Jr., 2004. "The Relation between Student Attitudes toward Graphs and Performance in Economics," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 48(2), pages 41-52, October.
    12. Cynthia D. Hill & Tesa Stegner, 2003. "Which Students Benefit from Graphs in a Principles of Economics Class?," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 47(2), pages 69-77, October.
    13. W. Lee Hansen & Michael K. Salemi & John J. Siegfried, 2002. "Use It or Lose It: Teaching Literacy in the Economics Principles Course," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(2), pages 463-472, May.
    14. Oberrauch, Luis & Kaiser, Tim & Seeber, Günther, 2023. "Measuring economic competence of youth with a short scale," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    15. Peter W. Schuhmann & KimMarie McGoldrick & Robert T. Burrus, 2005. "Student Quantitative Literacy: Importance, Measurement, and Correlation with Economic Literacy," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 49(1), pages 49-65, March.
    16. Kaiser, Tim & Oberrauch, Luis & Pang, Ming Fai & Seeber, Günther, 2021. "Using the ‘Test of Economic Competence’ with secondary school students in Hong Kong: Results and psychometric properties," EconStor Preprints 236205, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    17. Mary Ellen Benedict & John Hoag, 2011. "Factors Influencing Performance in Economics: Graphs and Quantitative Usage," Chapters, in: Gail M. Hoyt & KimMarie McGoldrick (ed.), International Handbook on Teaching and Learning Economics, chapter 31, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    18. Warburton, C.E.S., 2020. "Pedagogical Ethics And Economic Growth," Regional and Sectoral Economic Studies, Euro-American Association of Economic Development, vol. 20(2), pages 19-34.
    19. Dennis L. Weisman, 2012. "An Essay on the Art and Science of Teaching," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 57(1), pages 111-125, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    graph competence; graph comprehension; economic competence; item response theory; measurement instrument;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A22 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Undergraduate

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:300727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.