IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/amerec/v47y2003i2p69-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Which Students Benefit from Graphs in a Principles of Economics Class?

Author

Listed:
  • Cynthia D. Hill
  • Tesa Stegner

Abstract

Graphical analysis is a key tool used by economics professors, yet some students may not be at a cognitive level to benefit from a lecture replete with graphs. This paper addresses this issue by examining whether students with similar backgrounds, goals and/or characteristics have difficulty using graphs. Using survey data of principles of economics students, this paper finds that student grade point average and preference toward math and logic puzzles have a positive and significant relationship with answering a graphical question correctly. There are two other findings of particular interest. Contrary to other studies regarding the success in an economics class, this study finds no gender differences across students. Additionally, this paper finds that a student with a mother who has obtained a bachelor degree is more likely to answer a graphical question correctly than a student whose mother has not earned a degree.

Suggested Citation

  • Cynthia D. Hill & Tesa Stegner, 2003. "Which Students Benefit from Graphs in a Principles of Economics Class?," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 47(2), pages 69-77, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:amerec:v:47:y:2003:i:2:p:69-77
    DOI: 10.1177/056943450304700206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/056943450304700206
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/056943450304700206?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elchanan Cohn & Sharon Cohn & Donald C. Balch & James Bradley, 2001. "Do Graphs Promote Learning in Principles of Economics?," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 299-310, January.
    2. Ann L. Owen & Elizabeth J. Jensen, 2000. "Why Are Women Such Reluctant Economists? Evidence from Liberal Arts Colleges," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 90(2), pages 466-470, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mary Ellen Benedict & John Hoag, 2011. "Factors Influencing Performance in Economics: Graphs and Quantitative Usage," Chapters, in: Gail M. Hoyt & KimMarie McGoldrick (ed.), International Handbook on Teaching and Learning Economics, chapter 31, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew Worthington & Helen Higgs, 2003. "Factors explaining the choice of a finance major: the role of students' characteristics, personality and perceptions of the profession," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21.
    2. Hadsell, Lester, 2020. "Not for want of trying: Effort and Success of women in principles of microeconomics," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    3. Ann L. Owen, 2010. "Grades, Gender, and Encouragement: A Regression Discontinuity Analysis," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(3), pages 217-234, June.
    4. Gourley, Patrick, 2021. "Back to basics: How reading the text and taking notes improves learning," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    5. David Zetland & Carlo Russo & Navin Yavapolkul, 2010. "Teaching Economic Principles: Algebra, Graph or Both?," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 55(1), pages 123-131, May.
    6. Patricia M. Flynn & Michael A. Quinn, 2010. "Economics: Good Choice of Major for Future Ceos," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 55(1), pages 58-72, May.
    7. Ring, Malte & Oberrauch, Luis, 2024. "Measuring Economic Graph Competence," EconStor Preprints 300727, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    8. Ray Bachan & Michael Barrow, 2006. "Modelling Curriculum Choice at A-level: Why is Business Studies More Popular than Economics?," International Review of Economic Education, Economics Network, University of Bristol, vol. 5(2), pages 58-80.
    9. Belayet Hossain & Panagiotis Tsigaris, 2015. "Are grade expectations rational? A classroom experiment," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 199-212, April.
    10. Joseph G. Eisenhauer, 2018. "Algebraic Optimization: Marginal Analysis without Calculus," Journal for Economic Educators, Middle Tennessee State University, Business and Economic Research Center, vol. 18(1), pages 16-27, Spring.
    11. David Sabiston & Ambrose Leung & Gianfranco Terrazzano, 2017. "Learning styles and performance in principles of economics: does the gender gap exist?," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(4), pages 2935-2944.
    12. Ann Davis, 2001. "Book Review: Valuing Us All," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 33(4), pages 505-508, December.
    13. Owen, Stephanie, 2023. "College major choice and beliefs about relative performance: An experimental intervention to understand gender gaps in STEM," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    14. Coates, Dennis & Humphreys, Brad R. & Kane, John & Vachris, Michelle A., 2004. ""No significant distance" between face-to-face and online instruction: evidence from principles of economics," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 533-546, October.
    15. Cynthia Harter & Diego Mendez-Carbajo, 2024. "Diving into the Gap: Recognizing Gender Differences in an Online Learning Activity," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 50(1), pages 79-102, January.
    16. Ibrahim Demir & Robert D. Tollison, 2015. "Graphs in Economics," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 35(3), pages 1834-1847.
    17. Andrew C. Worthington & Helen Higgs, 2000. "Student Perceptions of the Profession and the Decision to Major in Economics," School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series 085, School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology.
    18. Mario Arturo Ruiz Estrada & Su-Fei Yap & Noor Azina Binti Ismail, 2017. "Revisiting the Phillips Curve: Visualization from a Multidimensional Graphical Perspective," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 11(1), March.
    19. Rask, Kevin, 2010. "Attrition in STEM fields at a liberal arts college: The importance of grades and pre-collegiate preferences," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(6), pages 892-900, December.
    20. Cohn, Elchanan & Cohn, Sharon & Balch, Donald C. & Bradley, James Jr., 2004. "Determinants of undergraduate GPAs: SAT scores, high-school GPA and high-school rank," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 577-586, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:amerec:v:47:y:2003:i:2:p:69-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://journals.sagepub.com/home/aex .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.