IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/esprep/268301.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Aktuelle Entwicklungen in der europäischen Fusionskontrolle - Beitrag zum Doktoranden-Seminar am 10./11.4.2003, Marburg -

Author

Listed:
  • Christiansen, Arndt

Abstract

In der europäischen Fusionskontrolle sind in den letzten Jahren bedeutende Entwicklungen zu verzeichnen gewesen. Wegen der Rekordzahl von fünf Verbotsentscheidungen wurde 2001 als das "year of the controversal decisions by the European Commission" bezeichnet (Weitbrecht 2002a, S. 412). In diesem Sinne wäre 2002 mit drei Aufhebungsurteilen dann als das "Jahr des Europäischen Gerichts Erster Instanz" zu bezeichnen. Hinzu kommt die von der EU-Kommission mit ihrem Grünbuch vom Dezember 2001 (EK 2001b) angestossene Debatte über eine Revision der Fusionskontrollverordnung (FKVO), die Ende 2002 ihren vorläufigen Abschluss mit der gleichzeitigen Veröffentlichung der Entwürfe für eine novellierte FKVO und für eine Mitteilung über die Kontrolle horizontaler Zusammenschlüsse gefunden hat (EK 2002d,e). Diese Entwicklungen und ihre Beziehungen untereinander werden im folgenden betrachtet. Im 2. Kapitel werden zunächst die drei Gerichtsurteile des Jahres 2002 ausführlich dargestellt. In 3. Kapitel werden dann deren Auswirkungen auf die laufende Revision der Fusionskontrolle und die Entscheidungspraxis der Kommission analysiert. Dabei sollen insbesondere einige grundsätzliche Fragen im Zusammenhang mit der europäischen Fusionskontrolle aufgeworfen werden, die sich aus den aktuellen Entwicklungen ergeben.

Suggested Citation

  • Christiansen, Arndt, 2003. "Aktuelle Entwicklungen in der europäischen Fusionskontrolle - Beitrag zum Doktoranden-Seminar am 10./11.4.2003, Marburg -," EconStor Preprints 268301, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:268301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/268301/1/Aktuelle%20Entwicklungen%20in%20der%20europ%c3%a4ischen%20Fusionskontrolle.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baumol, William J & Ordover, Janusz A, 1985. "Use of Antitrust to Subvert Competition," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 28(2), pages 247-265, May.
    2. Randzio-Plath, Christa & Rapkay, Bernhard, 2003. "Neue Herausforderungen für die Fusionskontrolle," Wirtschaftsdienst – Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik (1949 - 2007), ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 83(2), pages 116-121.
    3. William E. Kovacic & Carl Shapiro, 2000. "Antitrust Policy: A Century of Economic and Legal Thinking," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 14(1), pages 43-60, Winter.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hüschelrath, Kai, 2008. "Is it Worth all the Trouble? The Costs and Benefits of Antitrust Enforcement," ZEW Discussion Papers 08-107, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    2. Andrey V. Makarov, 2014. "Comparative Analusis Of Antitrust Policy Against Collusion In Some Transition Economies: Challenges For Effectiveness," HSE Working papers WP BRP 20/PA/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    3. Joshua D. Wright, 2010. "The Chicago School, Transaction Cost Economics, and Antitrust," Chapters, in: Peter G. Klein & Michael E. Sykuta (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics, chapter 23, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Adrien de Hauteclocque & Jean-Michel Glachant, 2011. "Long-term Contracts and Competition Policy in European Energy Markets," Chapters, in: Jean-Michel Glachant & Dominique Finon & Adrien de Hauteclocque (ed.), Competition, Contracts and Electricity Markets, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. William Shughart & Fred McChesney, 2010. "Public choice theory and antitrust policy," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 385-406, March.
    6. Stefania-Cristina Curea & Eduard Dinu & Paul Prisecaru, 2017. "The Analysis of the Correlation between the Degree of Market Concentration and the Level of Consumer Protection," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(45), pages 339-339, May.
    7. Ohanian, Lee E., 2009. "What - or who - started the great depression?," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 144(6), pages 2310-2335, November.
    8. Litan, Robert E. & Shapiro, Carl, 2001. "Antitrust Policy During the Clinton Administration," Competition Policy Center, Working Paper Series qt45r5r72p, Competition Policy Center, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    9. Goodwin, Neva, 2005. "The limitations of markets: Background essay," MPRA Paper 27940, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Richard B. Baker & Carola Frydman & Eric Hilt, 2023. "Political Discretion and Antitrust Policy: Evidence from the Assassination of President McKinley," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 66(4), pages 837-873.
    11. Elizabeth Bailey, 2015. "Behavioral Economics and U.S. Antitrust Policy," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 47(3), pages 355-366, November.
    12. Büthe, Tim & Morgan, Stephen, 2015. "Antitrust Enforcement and Foreign Competition: Special Interest Theory Reconsidered," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205607, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Marc Deschamps, 2013. "Pourquoi des politiques de concurrence ?," GREDEG Working Papers 2013-23, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    14. Bougette, Patrice & Deschamps, Marc & Marty, Frédéric, 2015. "When Economics Met Antitrust: The Second Chicago School and the Economization of Antitrust Law," Enterprise & Society, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 313-353, June.
    15. James Dalton & Louis Esposito, 2011. "Standard Oil and Predatory Pricing: Myth Paralleling Fact," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 38(3), pages 245-266, May.
    16. Luke Garrod & Bruce Lyons, 2011. "Early Settlement and Errors in Merger Control," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Competition Policy (CCP) 2011-05, Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    17. Valentiny, Pál & Antal-Pomázi, Krisztina, 2023. "Versenyközgazdászok [Competition economists]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 647-671.
    18. Hugues Bouthinon-Dumas & Frédéric Marty, 2012. "Cartel and Monopoly Policy," Chapters, in: Michael Dietrich & Jackie Krafft (ed.), Handbook on the Economics and Theory of the Firm, chapter 34, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Roger Sherman, 2001. "The Future of Market Regulation," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(4), pages 782-800, April.
    20. Bonardi, Jean-Philippe, 2008. "The internal limits to firms' nonmarket activities," MPRA Paper 14500, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fusionskontrolle;

    JEL classification:

    • K21 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Antitrust Law
    • L41 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - Monopolization; Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:esprep:268301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.