IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/eiswps/3.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Zur Evaluation wissenschaftlicher Publikationsleistungen in der Sportwissenschaft

Author

Listed:
  • Dessauer, Benedict
  • Emrich, Eike
  • Klein, Markus
  • Pierdzioch, Christian

Abstract

Forschungsrankings beruhen teilweise auf bibliometrischen Daten. Die dabei zur Bewertung der Publikationsbeiträge herangezogenen Indikatoren führen häufig zu Diskussionen. Der Beitrag untersucht Probleme und Folgen der Erfassung von Publikationsleistungen in der Sportwissenschaft. Nach einer Charakterisierung des Wissenschaftsmarktes und der Genese des aktuellen CHE-Rankings in der Sportwissenschaft werden auf empirischer Basis die Wirkung veränderter Transformationsregeln bei der Bewertung von Publikationsleistungen, mögliche Skaleneffekte in der Publikationstätigkeit, der Einfluss der Publikationsform auf die Rankingplatzierung, der Zusammenhang des Alters mit den präferierten Publikationsformen und der Alterseinfluss auf den Publikationsoutput untersucht. Deutlich wird u.a., dass die vom Publikationsranking ausgehenden Effekte insbesondere bei jüngeren Wissenschaftlern ebenso risikoaverse wie rankingbeeinflusste Strategien bei der Wahl ihres Forschungsthemas oder ihrer Forschungsmethode begünstigen, in deren Folge es zu einer unerwünschten, innovationsfeindlichen Homogenisierungstendenz unter wettbewerblichen Bedingungen kommt.

Suggested Citation

  • Dessauer, Benedict & Emrich, Eike & Klein, Markus & Pierdzioch, Christian, 2013. "Zur Evaluation wissenschaftlicher Publikationsleistungen in der Sportwissenschaft," Working Papers of the European Institute for Socioeconomics 3, European Institute for Socioeconomics (EIS), Saarbrücken.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:eiswps:3
    DOI: 10.22028/D291-23370
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/230853/1/EIS-Workingpaper-03-2013.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22028/D291-23370?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Rauber & Heinrich W. Ursprung, 2008. "Life Cycle and Cohort Productivity in Economic Research: The Case of Germany," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 9(4), pages 431-456, November.
    2. Heinrich W. Ursprung, 2003. "Schneewittchen im Land der Klapperschlangen: Evaluation eines Evaluators," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 4(2), pages 177-190, May.
    3. John Hudson, 2007. "Be known by the company you keep: Citations — quality or chance?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 71(2), pages 231-238, May.
    4. repec:bla:germec:v:9:y:2008:i::p:431-456 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Anthony F. J. van Raan, 2005. "Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 62(1), pages 133-143, January.
    6. Emrich, Eike & Pierdzioch, Christian, 2011. "Im Biotop der Wissenschaft: Das PARK-Modell der Makroökonomie," Schriften des Europäischen Instituts für Sozioökonomie e.V., European Institute for Socioeconomics (EIS), Saarbrücken, volume 1, number 1, June.
    7. George Akerlof, 1976. "The Economics of Caste and of the Rat Race and Other Woeful Tales," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 90(4), pages 599-617.
    8. Emrich, Eike & Pierdzioch, Christian, 2012. "Vademecum der Evalualogie: Neue Arten im Biotop der Wissenschaft," Schriften des Europäischen Instituts für Sozioökonomie e.V., European Institute for Socioeconomics (EIS), Saarbrücken, volume 2, number 2, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Florian Bischoff & Freya Gassmann & E. Emrich, 2017. "Demand for and Satisfaction with Places at University – An Empirical Comparative Study," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 6(2), pages 1-59, April.
    2. Hefeker Carsten & Potrafke Niklas, 2021. "Heinrich W. Ursprung – Herausragender Ökonom, Mentor und Ratgeber," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 22(4), pages 370-374, November.
    3. Emrich, Eike & Pitsch, Werner, 2014. "Sportwissenschaft als Kirche der Vernunft und ihre Gläubigen: Die normativen Grundlagen wissenschaftlicher Rationalität," Working Papers of the European Institute for Socioeconomics 10, European Institute for Socioeconomics (EIS), Saarbrücken.
    4. Emrich, Eike, 2014. "Evaluation zwischen Angebot und Nachfrage - Vom Ethos der Forschung und dessen Wirkung auf die Wissensmärkte," Working Papers of the European Institute for Socioeconomics 9, European Institute for Socioeconomics (EIS), Saarbrücken.
    5. Rabishankar Giri & Sabuj Kumar Chaudhuri, 2021. "Ranking journals through the lens of active visibility," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(3), pages 2189-2208, March.
    6. Domingo Docampo & Lawrence Cram, 2019. "Highly cited researchers: a moving target," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(3), pages 1011-1025, March.
    7. Yann Kossi & Jean-Yves Lesueur & Mareva Sabatier, 2016. "Publish or teach? The role of the scientific environment on academics’ multitasking," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 25(3), pages 487-506.
    8. Klaus Wohlrabe, 2014. "Eine Kritik des FAZ-Ökonomenrankings 2013," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 67(13), pages 63-67, July.
    9. Männasoo, Kadri, 2022. "Working hours and gender wage differentials: Evidence from the American Working Conditions Survey," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    10. Josh Lerner, 2002. "150 Years of Patent Protection," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(2), pages 221-225, May.
    11. Garey Ramey & Valerie A. Ramey, 2010. "The Rug Rat Race," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 41(1 (Spring), pages 129-199.
    12. Mehdi Rhaiem & Nabil Amara, 2020. "Determinants of research efficiency in Canadian business schools: evidence from scholar-level data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(1), pages 53-99, October.
    13. Daraio, Cinzia & Bonaccorsi, Andrea & Simar, Léopold, 2015. "Rankings and university performance: A conditional multidimensional approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(3), pages 918-930.
    14. Emeric Henry, 2009. "Strategic Disclosure of Research Results: The Cost of Proving Your Honesty," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(539), pages 1036-1064, July.
    15. Becker, Sascha O. & Rubin, Jared & Woessmann, Ludger, 2020. "Religion in Economic History: A Survey," CEPR Discussion Papers 14894, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    16. Magnus Hatlebakk, 2014. "Poverty Dynamics in Rural Orissa: Transitions in Assets and Occupations over Generations," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(6), pages 877-893, June.
    17. Pieter Serneels, 2004. "The Nature of Unemployment in Urban Ethiopia," CSAE Working Paper Series 2004-01, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
    18. Ingrid Bauer & Liudmila Zavolokina & Gerhard Schwabe, 2020. "Is there a market for trusted car data?," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(2), pages 211-225, June.
    19. Jinyoung Kim & Kanghyock Koh, 2014. "Incentives for Journal Editors," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(1), pages 348-371, February.
    20. Kjetil Haugen, 2023. "The doping dilemma is not the only dilemma in sport," Economics and Business Letters, Oviedo University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 40-48.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:eiswps:3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eis-online.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.