IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/cauman/384.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Distribution Requirements and Compactness Constraints in School Timetabling. Part II: Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Drexl, Andreas
  • Salewski, Frank

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Drexl, Andreas & Salewski, Frank, 1996. "Distribution Requirements and Compactness Constraints in School Timetabling. Part II: Methods," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 384, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:cauman:384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/181063/1/manuskript_384.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward W. Davis & James H. Patterson, 1975. "A Comparison of Heuristic and Optimum Solutions in Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(8), pages 944-955, April.
    2. Costa, Daniel, 1994. "A tabu search algorithm for computing an operational timetable," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 98-110, July.
    3. Robert H. Storer & S. David Wu & Renzo Vaccari, 1992. "New Search Spaces for Sequencing Problems with Application to Job Shop Scheduling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(10), pages 1495-1509, October.
    4. Manuel Laguna & Thomas A. Feo & Hal C. Elrod, 1994. "A Greedy Randomized Adaptive Search Procedure for the Two-Partition Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 677-687, August.
    5. Rainer Kolisch & Arno Sprecher & Andreas Drexl, 1995. "Characterization and Generation of a General Class of Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(10), pages 1693-1703, October.
    6. Kolisch, Rainer, 1996. "Serial and parallel resource-constrained project scheduling methods revisited: Theory and computation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 320-333, April.
    7. Fred Glover, 1990. "Tabu Search—Part II," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 4-32, February.
    8. Fred Glover, 1989. "Tabu Search---Part I," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 1(3), pages 190-206, August.
    9. Thomas A. Feo & Mauricio G. C. Resende & Stuart H. Smith, 1994. "A Greedy Randomized Adaptive Search Procedure for Maximum Independent Set," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 42(5), pages 860-878, October.
    10. S. S. Panwalkar & Wafik Iskander, 1977. "A Survey of Scheduling Rules," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 45-61, February.
    11. James C. Bean, 1994. "Genetic Algorithms and Random Keys for Sequencing and Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 154-160, May.
    12. Andreas Drexl, 1991. "Scheduling of Project Networks by Job Assignment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(12), pages 1590-1602, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schirmer, Andreas & Riesenberg, Sven, 1997. "Parameterized heuristics for project scheduling: Biased random sampling methods," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 456, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    2. Andreas Schirmer, 2000. "Case‐based reasoning and improved adaptive search for project scheduling," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 47(3), pages 201-222, April.
    3. Schirmer, Andreas, 1998. "Case-based reasoning and improved adaptive search for project scheduling," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 472, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    4. Salewski, Frank & Bartsch, Thomas, 1994. "A comparison of genetic and greedy randomized algorithms for medium-to-short-term audit-staff scheduling," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 356, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    5. Böttcher, Jan & Drexl, Andreas & Kolisch, Rainer & Salewski, Frank, 1996. "Project scheduling under partially renewable resource constraints," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 398, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    6. Kolisch, R. & Padman, R., 2001. "An integrated survey of deterministic project scheduling," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 249-272, June.
    7. Drexl, Andreas & Salewski, Frank, 1997. "Distribution requirements and compactness constraints in school timetabling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 193-214, October.
    8. Drexl, Andreas & Juretzka, Jan & Salewski, Frank, 1993. "Academic course scheduling under workload and changeover constraints," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 337, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    9. Schirmer, Andreas & Riesenberg, Sven, 1998. "Class-based control schemes for parameterized project scheduling heuristics," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 471, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    10. A. D. López-Sánchez & J. Sánchez-Oro & M. Laguna, 2021. "A New Scatter Search Design for Multiobjective Combinatorial Optimization with an Application to Facility Location," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 629-642, May.
    11. Bryan A. Norman & James C. Bean, 1999. "A genetic algorithm methodology for complex scheduling problems," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(2), pages 199-211, March.
    12. C N Potts & V A Strusevich, 2009. "Fifty years of scheduling: a survey of milestones," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 41-68, May.
    13. Buddhakulsomsiri, Jirachai & Kim, David S., 2007. "Priority rule-based heuristic for multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problems with resource vacations and activity splitting," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(2), pages 374-390, April.
    14. Drexl, Andreas & Kolisch, Rainer & Sprecher, Arno, 1995. "Neuere Entwicklungen in der computergestützten Projektplanung," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 379, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    15. Fernando Stefanello & Vaneet Aggarwal & Luciana S. Buriol & Mauricio G. C. Resende, 2019. "Hybrid algorithms for placement of virtual machines across geo-separated data centers," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 748-793, October.
    16. Luise-Sophie Hoffmann & Carolin Kellenbrink & Stefan Helber, 2020. "Simultaneous structuring and scheduling of multiple projects with flexible project structures," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(5), pages 679-711, June.
    17. Kolisch, Rainer & Hempel, Kai, 1996. "Finite scheduling capabilities of commercial project management systems," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 397, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    18. Drexl, Andreas & Haase, Knut, 1993. "Sequential-analysis-based randomized-regret-methods for lotsizing and scheduling," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 323, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    19. Kolisch, Rainer, 1996. "Serial and parallel resource-constrained project scheduling methods revisited: Theory and computation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 320-333, April.
    20. Osman Hürol Türkakın & David Arditi & Ekrem Manisalı, 2021. "Comparison of Heuristic Priority Rules in the Solution of the Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling Problem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:cauman:384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibkiede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.